Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It's time for the NFLPA to stand up for field conditions


TheCasillas
 Share

Recommended Posts

The Lions reportedely hated our field and the condition of it.. they were quoted saying it felt like landing on concrete. 

In all honesty owners are going to continue to take advantage of the turf field option until its outlawed. Its time for the NFLPA to stand up for their players. This is the game of checks and balances, and the NFLPA needs to put their foot down this offseason. Until they speak up, it's no one person's fault but their own. By no means am I standing up for the owners of the NFL, but I am expecting the NFLPA to do their jobs and fight for the players this offseason. 

https://www.mlive.com/lions/2022/12/lions-trash-field-conditions-in-carolina-i-didnt-think-that-was-actually-legal.html

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I get that the NFLPA is looking out for their members but honestly when you look at the product on the field their efforts have made it objectively worse.

By limiting practices, in particular full contact practices, the NFLPA is directly responsible for the lower quality of play that we see week in and week out.

If they decide to take up the cause of the playing surface I can only assume that they will find a way to fug it up too.

 

And Im a very pro-union guy.  Just in the case of the NFLPA I think they have had a long run of extremely myopic leadership.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, uncfan888 said:

The ground was frozen. My yard isn't turf and it feels like concrete. They need to stop bitching

If the ground underneath turf freezes it feels harder than regular frozen sod.

Basically if water collects under the turf in the layer of soil and freezes. You are basically playing on a thin layer of carpet on an ice rink. 
 

Where as natural grass adds that barrier of water absorption. 
 

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

If the ground underneath turf freezes it feels harder than regular frozen sod.

Basically if water collects under the turf in the layer of soil and freezes. You are basically playing on a thin layer of carpet on an ice rink. 
 

Where as natural grass adds that barrier of water absorption. 
 


image.jpeg.777f4da0f1bda0ac7a77e5eddc7b4fca.jpeg

 

Drainage isn’t the issue. Everything just froze and became very hard. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Harbingers said:

If the ground underneath turf freezes it feels harder than regular frozen sod.

Basically if water collects under the turf in the layer of soil and freezes. You are basically playing on a thin layer of carpet on an ice rink. 
 

Where as natural grass adds that barrier of water absorption. 
 

Yesterday was exceptional though.  At 8 degrees, the ground is rock hard regardless.  The Bears were also complaining about the field conditions in Chicago, and it is grass. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Davidson Deac II said:

Yesterday was exceptional though.  At 8 degrees, the ground is rock hard regardless.  The Bears were also complaining about the field conditions in Chicago, and it is grass. 

Chicago did switch their sod this year. But they also heat their field. I highly doubt we have a heating system currently. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 12/25/2022 at 1:17 PM, Harbingers said:

If the ground underneath turf freezes it feels harder than regular frozen sod.

Basically if water collects under the turf in the layer of soil and freezes. You are basically playing on a thin layer of carpet on an ice rink. 
 

Where as natural grass adds that barrier of water absorption. 
 

Not in 14 degree weather.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...