Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

It was fun while it lasted... Love Wilks as a man, but today was the final word on defensive head coaches... In the words of Mike Singletary, "Don't want them. Can't win with them."


Proudiddy
 Share

Recommended Posts

Look at McDermott and the Buffalo situation.  Possibly the exception to the rule?  Don't get me wrong, I want an offensive guru to be our next HC and get away from the stubborn, stodgy, you-can-win-14-to-10, antiquated, conservative, ghost of Jerry Richardson, John Fox/Ron Rivera clone.  But how many Sean McVay's are just sitting around waiting for an HC job?  And would they want to be handcuffed to Darnold, Corral, or who we might be able to get in FA or mid-first round draft?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Chaos said:

Look at McDermott and the Buffalo situation.  Possibly the exception to the rule?  Don't get me wrong, I want an offensive guru to be our next HC and get away from the stubborn, stodgy, you-can-win-14-to-10, antiquated, conservative, ghost of Jerry Richardson, John Fox/Ron Rivera clone.  But how many Sean McVay's are just sitting around waiting for an HC job?  And would they want to be handcuffed to Darnold, Corral, or who we might be able to get in FA or mid-first round draft?

McD, Belichick, and Tomlin are definitely exceptions to the rule.  And look at how the latter two are now faring without HOF QBs and somewhat quality OCs.

Any good OC will believe they can turn chicken poo into chicken salad, no matter what we already have here.  Look at what Sirriani did in Philly when he was hired.  I don't know that their roster was any more appealing than what we have now.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

I get what you're saying, but to be fair the coach on the other sideline is a defensive coach as well.

Yeah, but Leftwich is highly regarded, and is also likely to become HC somewhere in the near future.  That team is going to be going through it when Leftwich and Brady leave.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve stated the entire time that Wilks had to get us to the playoffs in order for me to want us to keep him. We have had seasons like this before and as with this season, fallen short right at the end again. 
 

Wilks needed to Prove he was different imo, and winning the division would have proved that. Most of Wilks’s  success this season came from the Fact that he knew how to coach an NFL team and players vs Matt Rhule who didn’t have a fuging clue as to what he was doing. We could’ve gotten this result with any halfway decent NFL coach. Wilks while doing a good job this season and a huge upgrade over Rhule is easily replaceable imo.

if he does some how end up keeping the job, I won’t be mad. Just disappointed we didn’t try to do better.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, frankw said:

As an interim that inherited a mess he's done a hell of a lot better than Rhule ever did hats off to him there but that isn't the bar. The search continues...

He made the season interesting and brought meaningful football to January for us. Nice.

Now to find a coach that has us playing in February....

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Dante Moore is the top pick in a couple of mock drafts now. 
    • Yeah I am sure you are right. Every week it seems there is something whacky in those numbers they post. I like my simple eyeball test, been watching over 60;years. I know when someone loses or wins a matchup or performs above or sucks.  When WR and QB aren’t in sync, I can’t know who was suppose to do what all the time and don’t try to say. Defensive coverages blown, I don’t always know that either.. so I am imperfect.  I think PFF is too. No big deal. It’s fun looking at the grades anyway. 
    • The secret with PFF is they are specifically opaque because they traded in their once good reputation to poo out next day madden grades for monday morning desk warriors who want something to click on. It takes NFL teams about 36 hours to fully grade every play from their own team, and those are the coaches who know what all of the play calls are, who all of the players are, are professionals at their jobs, and have a staff of interns helping them do it.  I know people that do this for PFF. There are some people that are smart and good and know what they're talking about, but they're rare. And even in the case of people that have football experience, they don't know the plays. They have an idea of the plays. This is to say nothing about the idiots who played one year of JV ball and never saw the field and can't get over it. That's what the most of PFF is.  These grades are completely worthless. 
×
×
  • Create New...