Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

If Wilks weren't from Charlotte and a former member of the staff, would you still want him as HC next year?


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

23 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Were you happy with Rhule?

I didn't want him initially given he had no head coach experience and worse brought his college folks along. But I had no idea what was discussed or what he could do so I supported him until I didn't.  Now though I want a guy with experience as a head coach whether he is an offensive or defensive guy. I am tired of developing coordinators hoping they work out long-term.  It usually takes years for them to figure out how to be a head coach.

Edited by panthers55
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, electro's horse said:

Honestly Wilks being a member of the Rivera staff is hurting him on this board. 
 

fans are projecting grievances from that era on to him. 

are they still projections tho if they manifest themselves on the field?

I’ve also always found it ridiculously odd where someone was from mattered or was a factor in any sense when choosing the best candidate, particularly during the Hurney area, he’d legit trade draft picks just to draft a loser from the area

who the fug cares about all that anyway? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Remember that time the Hornets drafted JR Reid? Remember that time the Panthers drafted Armanti Edwards?

You HAVE to take feel good emotions out of hirings/picks.

Wtf… Dumb analogy that has nothing to do with this situation..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Wtf… Dumb analogy that has nothing to do with this situation..

It's a perfect analogy. My mother visited me recently and said she likes Wilks because of his Charlotte roots. That's what science calls a "result". Both JR and Armanti were chosen because of their roots. Wilks being local should mean absolutely nothing.

Edited by Brooklyn 3.0
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

It's a perfect analogy. My mother visited me recently and said she likes Wilks because of his Charlotte roots. That's what science calls a "result". Both JR and Armanti were chosen because of their roots. Wilks being local should mean absolutely nothing.

So the fug what?? Reid and Edwards were draft picks who hadn’t proved anything in the pros.. Atleast Wilkes has proven to be a competent coach and could be better if given a full season to implement his philosophy into a team.. Instead of cleaning up somebody else’s mess.. Bad analogy all around..

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

So the fug what?? Reid and Edwards were draft picks who hadn’t proved anything in the pros.. Atleast Wilkes has proven to be a competent coach and could be better if given a full season to implement his philosophy into a team.. Instead of cleaning up somebody else’s mess.. Bad analogy all around..

Wilks has also proven nothing. Was a failure at Arizona and then got us a handful of wins. Big whoop. I'd expect most NFL coaches could string together a handful of wins. In fact, most do.

Tell the room why you like him so much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Wilks has also proven nothing. Was a failure at Arizona and then got us a handful of wins. Big whoop. I'd expect most NFL coaches could string together a handful of wins. In fact, most do.

Tell the room why you like him so much.

We really going to do this Bullshit??

If we go by 1 year to start a HC career then

Belicheck

Zac Taylor

Ron Rivera

Sean Payton 

Andy Reid

would have never been HC they are now..

Espcially when having a rookie QB they didn’t want..

plain and simple if Wilkes prove 1 thing this season is he is competent and can win with his Philosophy no matter what he has to work with..

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

We really going to do this Bullshit??

If we go by 1 year to start a HC career then

Belicheck

Zac Taylor

Ron Rivera

Sean Payton 

Andy Reid

would have never been HC they are now..

Espcially when having a rookie QB they didn’t want..

plain and simple if Wilkes prove 1 thing this season is he is competent and can win with his Philosophy no matter what he has to work with..

Wilks, not Wilkes.

But you do you, man. If he stays, you can support him through thick and thin. No bashing allowed! If he goes somewhere else, you can follow his career.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

Wilks, not Wilkes.

But you do you, man. If he stays, you can support him through thick and thin. No bashing allowed! If he goes somewhere else, you can follow his career.

You can leave now.. Go support another team and post BS on their board.. I was here before Capers clown.. I’ll be here regardless what they do..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, OceanPanther said:

LOL,,  fans minds, change by the hour lol.  I was reading the in game post on here yesterday,,  and I was SHOCKED ,,  after the first drive , we scored,,  at the number of fans posting ,  Give Darnald and extension,  lock Wilks up now.   And I mean LOTS OF comments.  You can go back and read them .   Just like the GET RID OF WILKS group were no where commenting after that first TD ..  Then we were up 14-0  ..  and WOW, I just knew  the hire Wilks group were  putting a Go Fund Me  page on facebook to raise money to help Tepper hire him ..    

Mine has never changed. I want an offensive minded head coach that is in tune with the way the NFL is headed. Nothing Wilks has done has changed that. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 1/2/2023 at 4:26 PM, SmokinwithWilly said:

Mine has never changed. I want an offensive minded head coach that is in tune with the way the NFL is headed. Nothing Wilks has done has changed that. 

I don't think we've ever had an offensive minded coach.   George Siefert probably was, but when he came here our team was pretty much a wreck.  I'm not defending him at all,,  he was worse than Rhule probably, but he didn't keep pee'ing on our leg and tell us it was raining like Rhule.  Siefert had Rice, Montana , Steve Young etc.  When he got here he was left with Jeff Lewis at QB .  Wesley Walls flourished under Siefert , he drafted Steve Smith ,  Dan Morgan, Kris Jenkins but never coached them. 

We've seen some defensive minded coaches have some superior teams and win super bowls.   Who are the great offensive minded coaches that won super bowls ?  That's not a smart @ass question, I'm curious as what others think .   "Greatest Show on Turf" , or Air Coryell   "  vs the Bear down Bears ( Monsters of the Midway)  or Ravens., or the Steel Curtain , or The Doomsday Defense.,  or  The Orange Crush,  The Purple People Eaters  ..  The No Name Defense ( the only undefeated team )

Yes, you have to have both.  Yes after the last 3 years I want to see some offense.  But you better be able to play defense first.

Edited by OceanPanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Give Wilks a two year prove it coaching contract with the right to assemble his own staff and input on drafting, team building.

We handed him a sunken ship in week six and somehow he was able to bring it home and keep it in contention until the end of week 17. AFTER trading CMC and releasing Baker Mayfield. And he was man enough to send Sideshow Bob Anderson packing after he showed out on the sidelines.

And somehow, he made Sam Darnold at least intriguing if not relevant again.

The man should get the opportunity. If we don't do it, someone else is going to and he's going to beat the snot out of us every time he gets the chance. And if you want to entertain dreams of Luke coming back to coach, it's not going to happen without Wilks in charge.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Keep away from North Winston,  you should be fine. West Winston towards Clemmins is cool. If you're ever at the Peterscreek Walmart, the Pepsi guy is 😎. 
    • Game-winning drives have been credited to QBs since the beginning of time
    • A lot of people have been slobbing all over this last draft but I hate the way that Fitterer/Morgan have built this offense since drafting Bryce. Anyone with eyes knew our IOL was crap but we didn't invest there and instead took project receivers and an injured RB. If you want a lesson in how build for your QB wrong, IMO, this was it. Draft him, protect him, THEN get him weapons. Its pretty much a rule, draft interior linemen, pay tackles. We're paying everyone. We had the opportunity to draft a center instead of Brooks, or perhaps instead of trading up for XL, trade back and take 2 guards/center. We could have paid Lewis and still drafted 2, but Hunt at 100m was just an overpay. And it's not like the guys many of us were begging us to draft were long shots. They're solid starters from day 1. Injuries happen. That's why all your starters can't be high value players. You need rookie contracts mixed in to be able to absorb those inevitable losses on the line. An offensive line playing an entire season together is an abnormality.  Factor into that also paying Moton 44m this offseason with a huge signing bonus when we didnt need to do right now to do him a "solid".  Now we have to sign Icky and possibly Bryce and it's a mess with more money tied up in the offense, inevitable cuts and dead cap coming. That's not even factoring in shifting Corbett to C last year after major injury to start at a position he's never played for an NFL season. It's all stuff that was foreseeable and pretty easily avoided.  The $$ and picks we've spent trying to surround Bryce outside of Tmac (Mitchell and Horn are TBD) have been used inefficiently IMO. Smarter drafting and FA with the line could have let us get more reliable weapons than XL and Sanders in FA. It might not be popular opinion, but I'll take a Bersin with hands that can get 6-8 85% of the time vs a big play XL with greasy fingers.  The part about hitting guys in stride was more about placement, which Bryce has struggled with. Obviously not every route is run to be hit in stride, but they do need to have the ball placed well to give the receivers a chance to do something after the catch. I just used Hill as an example because he's the biggest YAC threat I could think of over the past 5 years.   Receivers can feast on dink and dunk if it's schemed right. But to make it work, that vertical threat has to be there, if not the deep pass then the high speed routes that can spring someone for the huge YAC to keep the safeties from cheating into that 20 yard box all game.  I hope DC and Bryce can keep up what they did in the last game and it isnt just an Atlanta thing. But no matter what, I really want to see some better long term strategy coming from the FO. 
×
×
  • Create New...