Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates

Mr. Scot

By Mr. Scot,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

travisura Grand Master

travisura

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It does when a guy is demanding full control of your football operations. I think that's precisely why Tepper chatted with him and immediately decided no thanks on that. At least he seems to have learned his lesson from making that mistake previously.

It may be the case that Tepper has learned from his mistake, but I think you're making a rather large assumption that it was due to Harbaugh losing against TCU. And the full ramifications of that loss were not parsed out until last night when TCU sh*t the bed against Georgia, and that's well after Tepper has supposedly decided against Harbaugh.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OceanPanther Mentor

OceanPanther

Posted
Posted
13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Okay. I mean just a couple of years ago Michigan fans were ready to run him out of town because they sucked. 

Dude wants full control like Rhule. How you gonna go demand full control of an NFL team when the college team you couldn't beat just got the doors blown off of them by 8 (EIGHT!) touchdowns? 😂

I think you know that who beat who on different weeks doesn’t relate to the next week or month etc..

Michigan beat Ohio St

TCU beat Michigan. 
 

So that doesn’t mean TCU beats Ohio State.   I’m certainly not saying they couldn’t, but because TCU best Michigan doesn’t mean the best OSU by 20 etc. 

So having their worst game in years against UGA doesn’t mean they are awful. 
 

Harbaugh has had Michigan improve every year.  He seems to do that where ever he goes. . Off year every now and then, but in general he’s a winner at the highest levels.  From what little  we know, he doesn’t beat his wife, hang out in bars ( lap dancing lol ) etc .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
4 minutes ago, travisura said:

It may be the case that Tepper has learned from his mistake, but I think you're making a rather large assumption that it was due to Harbaugh losing against TCU. And the full ramifications of that loss were not parsed out until last night when TCU sh*t the bed against Georgia, and that's well after Tepper has supposedly decided against Harbaugh.

That's not what I said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
travisura Grand Master

travisura

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's not what I said. 

I said "Transitive property does not apply in sports" to which you said "It does when a guy is demanding full control of your football operations". How am I not to read that as you saying that Tepper was affected by the transitive property of Michigan's wins and losses (ie how who they beat did, and how who they lost to did)? Seems like that's exactly what you're saying, but maybe I'm just misunderstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Actionman0z Veteran

Actionman0z

Posted
Posted
11 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

I think you know that who beat who on different weeks doesn’t relate to the next week or month etc..

Michigan beat Ohio St

TCU beat Michigan. 
 

So that doesn’t mean TCU beats Ohio State.   I’m certainly not saying they couldn’t, but because TCU best Michigan doesn’t mean the best OSU by 20 etc. 

So having their worst game in years against UGA doesn’t mean they are awful. 
 

Harbaugh has had Michigan improve every year.  He seems to do that where ever he goes. . Off year every now and then, but in general he’s a winner at the highest levels.  From what little  we know, he doesn’t beat his wife, hang out in bars ( lap dancing lol ) etc .  

They only look at loss record. TCU winning 5 games on miracle plays should have been a sign. The two INT for TDs, mich continuing to run up the middle and call dumbass plays near the goal line. Cost them the game. Game should have been 21 more points for much and 24 less points for tcu. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
37 minutes ago, t96 said:

That would be stupid and a waste of an interview, Leftwich is trash and that was proven this year after Arians left. Ryans, although defensive which is not ideal, is a legit fresh HC candidate who would not be a waste of an interview.

Not even just for the Rooney rule although it would satisfy it, I'd circle back to Eric Bieniemy. Mahomes and Reid are great but his contributions to making the Chiefs the number 1 offense after getting rid of Hill can't be ignored. He should be a sought after legit candidate.

Tepper already interviewed Bieniemy.

So has pretty much everybody else, and this time around nobody's asking.

There's a reason he's not a head coach right now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
4 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

I always confuse Tony pike and Mike Kafka for some reason

Was Kafka ever on the panthers roster? In training camp or anything?

Was ken Dorsey?

Kafka? No.

Dorsey? Don't think so. He spent a year as a scout though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
LinvilleGorge Grand Master

LinvilleGorge

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, travisura said:

I said "Transitive property does not apply in sports" to which you said "It does when a guy is demanding full control of your football operations". How am I not to read that as you saying that Tepper was affected by the transitive property of Michigan's wins and losses (ie how who they beat did, and how who they lost to did)? Seems like that's exactly what you're saying, but maybe I'm just misunderstanding.

I didn't suggest the outcome of last night's game impacted Tepper's decision that was evidently made prior to last night's game. How you came up with that idea is baffling. I wasn't talking about the Panthers specifically but the NFL genetically. I thought that would've been obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
UNCrules2187 Mentor

UNCrules2187

Posted
Posted
19 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

I always confuse Tony pike and Mike Kafka for some reason

Was Kafka ever on the panthers roster? In training camp or anything?

Was ken Dorsey?

Neither Kafka nor Dorsey were on the roster during his playing days. Dorsey spent a year as a scout and 5 years as QB coach in Carolina though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Mr. Scot Grand Master

Mr. Scot

Posted
  • Author
Posted
16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I didn't suggest the outcome of last night's game impacted Tepper's decision that was evidently made prior to last night's game. How you came up with that idea is baffling. I wasn't talking about the Panthers specifically but the NFL genetically. I thought that would've been obvious.

Ironically enough...

🤔

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Chief Keek
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By Chief Keek · Posted

      The only WR that makes sense in the first is KC Concepcion. He fills multiple roles in the offense and is a PR specialist.
    • TD alt
      It is time to Consider the Likelihood of WR at #19

      By TD alt · Posted

      That depends upon what happens with receiver this year and what happens with free agency next year. Hopefully we'll be good by addressing receiver this year (regardless of whether we snag one in the first round or not). If we don't and are unlucky enough for to Coker get hurt (and X solidifies his bust status, and JAGs be JAGing), then we may be fùçked! But I assume that Dan Morgan and company will feel compelled to look for answers in free agency and use that to set up the draft just like this offseason.  Reality is not as simple as we drafted this position X times in a row in the first. If you're suggesting that we could draft a position in the first four times in a row, that's not likely. At some point probability has to be taken into account. I mean, how many years in a row can you be unlucky with one position?  As I've said at times before, you try and plan for the long term personnel-wise and cap-wise of course, but things happen so, in a sense, you still must look at each season--each "team" if you will--unto itself each season. So many things can happen between now and then. A major industry can profoundly impact the bigger picture (like this year), someone could offer you a trade proposal that you can't resist, players might not have progressed to your expectations--you know, things like that. Moreover, you have to be aware of the dynamics of each draft class, including the fact that there could be unexpected draft risers and fallers during the college season. That's a lot. As of today, we expect the 2027 draft to have more exclamations than question marks at OT and the QB class and WR group is expected to be exceptionally strong. We'll have a clearer picture of whatever we'll have to focus on next year at this time.  Lastly, keep in mind that there's always more than one way to get you to where you want to go. The yearly puzzle is not static, it's dynamic and complex.   
    • Chief Keek
      Emanuel McNeil Warren + Jacob Rodriguez

      By Chief Keek · Posted

      I'm fine with Thieneman or McNeil-Warren.. Rodriguez won't last until 51 so they would have to trade up, he may end up being a late first round selection. Anthony Hill Jr. is more likely to be available. I don't expect defense in the first round now after the murmurings of finding another weapon for Bryce.
×
×
  • Create New...