Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

It does when a guy is demanding full control of your football operations. I think that's precisely why Tepper chatted with him and immediately decided no thanks on that. At least he seems to have learned his lesson from making that mistake previously.

It may be the case that Tepper has learned from his mistake, but I think you're making a rather large assumption that it was due to Harbaugh losing against TCU. And the full ramifications of that loss were not parsed out until last night when TCU sh*t the bed against Georgia, and that's well after Tepper has supposedly decided against Harbaugh.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Okay. I mean just a couple of years ago Michigan fans were ready to run him out of town because they sucked. 

Dude wants full control like Rhule. How you gonna go demand full control of an NFL team when the college team you couldn't beat just got the doors blown off of them by 8 (EIGHT!) touchdowns? 😂

I think you know that who beat who on different weeks doesn’t relate to the next week or month etc..

Michigan beat Ohio St

TCU beat Michigan. 
 

So that doesn’t mean TCU beats Ohio State.   I’m certainly not saying they couldn’t, but because TCU best Michigan doesn’t mean the best OSU by 20 etc. 

So having their worst game in years against UGA doesn’t mean they are awful. 
 

Harbaugh has had Michigan improve every year.  He seems to do that where ever he goes. . Off year every now and then, but in general he’s a winner at the highest levels.  From what little  we know, he doesn’t beat his wife, hang out in bars ( lap dancing lol ) etc .  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, travisura said:

It may be the case that Tepper has learned from his mistake, but I think you're making a rather large assumption that it was due to Harbaugh losing against TCU. And the full ramifications of that loss were not parsed out until last night when TCU sh*t the bed against Georgia, and that's well after Tepper has supposedly decided against Harbaugh.

That's not what I said. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

That's not what I said. 

I said "Transitive property does not apply in sports" to which you said "It does when a guy is demanding full control of your football operations". How am I not to read that as you saying that Tepper was affected by the transitive property of Michigan's wins and losses (ie how who they beat did, and how who they lost to did)? Seems like that's exactly what you're saying, but maybe I'm just misunderstanding.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, OceanPanther said:

I think you know that who beat who on different weeks doesn’t relate to the next week or month etc..

Michigan beat Ohio St

TCU beat Michigan. 
 

So that doesn’t mean TCU beats Ohio State.   I’m certainly not saying they couldn’t, but because TCU best Michigan doesn’t mean the best OSU by 20 etc. 

So having their worst game in years against UGA doesn’t mean they are awful. 
 

Harbaugh has had Michigan improve every year.  He seems to do that where ever he goes. . Off year every now and then, but in general he’s a winner at the highest levels.  From what little  we know, he doesn’t beat his wife, hang out in bars ( lap dancing lol ) etc .  

They only look at loss record. TCU winning 5 games on miracle plays should have been a sign. The two INT for TDs, mich continuing to run up the middle and call dumbass plays near the goal line. Cost them the game. Game should have been 21 more points for much and 24 less points for tcu. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, t96 said:

That would be stupid and a waste of an interview, Leftwich is trash and that was proven this year after Arians left. Ryans, although defensive which is not ideal, is a legit fresh HC candidate who would not be a waste of an interview.

Not even just for the Rooney rule although it would satisfy it, I'd circle back to Eric Bieniemy. Mahomes and Reid are great but his contributions to making the Chiefs the number 1 offense after getting rid of Hill can't be ignored. He should be a sought after legit candidate.

Tepper already interviewed Bieniemy.

So has pretty much everybody else, and this time around nobody's asking.

There's a reason he's not a head coach right now.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

I always confuse Tony pike and Mike Kafka for some reason

Was Kafka ever on the panthers roster? In training camp or anything?

Was ken Dorsey?

Kafka? No.

Dorsey? Don't think so. He spent a year as a scout though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, travisura said:

I said "Transitive property does not apply in sports" to which you said "It does when a guy is demanding full control of your football operations". How am I not to read that as you saying that Tepper was affected by the transitive property of Michigan's wins and losses (ie how who they beat did, and how who they lost to did)? Seems like that's exactly what you're saying, but maybe I'm just misunderstanding.

I didn't suggest the outcome of last night's game impacted Tepper's decision that was evidently made prior to last night's game. How you came up with that idea is baffling. I wasn't talking about the Panthers specifically but the NFL genetically. I thought that would've been obvious.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, electro's horse said:

I always confuse Tony pike and Mike Kafka for some reason

Was Kafka ever on the panthers roster? In training camp or anything?

Was ken Dorsey?

Neither Kafka nor Dorsey were on the roster during his playing days. Dorsey spent a year as a scout and 5 years as QB coach in Carolina though.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

16 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I didn't suggest the outcome of last night's game impacted Tepper's decision that was evidently made prior to last night's game. How you came up with that idea is baffling. I wasn't talking about the Panthers specifically but the NFL genetically. I thought that would've been obvious.

Ironically enough...

🤔

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah and I am doubtful he can offer that consistently. I don’t have many years left at my age and in my view we have wasted two and this whole exercise with him was always a three year minimum.  I am out on that with a guy I don’t believe in, and never believed in, it has sucked. To me it is a costly detour off the right track. Years.    But I am not so rigid that I can’t see excellence. He needs to display it though, consistently before I change my outlook.  
    • No, when I said rage, I meant rage, which only applies to certain fans on this board. Your timeline of trying to assess whether he is the future or not is really tied to the discussions surrounding his second contract. If this team is going to commit to some monster contract while he has shown nothing but glimpses of brilliance would be deservedly worrisome, so the clock is genuinely ticking for him to settle into something resembling his final form. Perhaps a best case scenario is that he plays well, the team succeeds, but he does so with a more limited role that makes the rest of the league view him as a game manager, and his second contract value reflects that. Then he continues to improve and becomes a bargain comparatively while not handicapping the team around him, and we enter an era of consistent championship competitiveness that the fanbase has craved for decades and has never really experienced before. But that requires many, many things to go right and for Bryce himself to facilitate that if he ends up being the quarterback of the future.
    • Exactly. And the flame throwers as well, get location benefits from not going all out. But they have it in reserve.  Not sure how much Greg had but he was an artist.  There was a YouTube I came across last year or maybe even 2023 and I don’t how to even find now but it had two NFL QBs I want say one was Carr from the Raiders but I don’t really remember  The point of it is they stood side by side throwing identical distances to identical targets. Radar gun was used.  They threw the normal effort (not all out) and it was measured etc. Then they were asked to throw their ‘fastball’. They were missing and most often they were missing high. It demonstrated the same principle.    edit: and applying that to arm strength, give me the guy that doesn’t need max effort to have good velocity. The margins are so narrow with less velocity in tne NFL the defenders can Close on it and this is a league where they value down to the 100th of a second level. It is that tight 
×
×
  • Create New...