Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Coaching interview updates


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, PantherMan89 said:

 

Thinking about it, good chance they do have their guy and all this Johnson hype, and requesting to interview Payton is just to throw other teams off from their guy until they interview Evero and get their 2nd miniority interview in.

 

Which would likely mean it’s not Wilks since nobody else has requested to interview him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Mr. Scot said:

Monken was OC for the Browns in 2019 alongside DC Steve Wilks.

Would be nice if Wilks could bring him aboard. For years, GA relied on a run heavy offense but under with Monken they’ve developed a passing game that has made them more potent on offense. That’s what Wilks needs to complement our rushing attack if he has any shot of being retained IMO. And that’s a big IF based on recent developments.

Edited by Prowler2k18
Link to comment
Share on other sites

This all does make me wonder if Steichen impressed and he gave them some of his prospective staff.  

Some of these don't make a ton of sense with Wilks (Like Vic), but maybe I'm wrong.  

Hell, maybe they're trying a bit of a different approach and vetting the HC candidates through referrals, that are in part also "coordinator" interviews.  

I'm probably wrong though ha

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On one hand, it could just be due diligence.  On the other, I just don't think you go to these lengths and this amount of interviews if you felt you already had the right HC in place.  So, I'm assuming they're not gonna retain Wilks.  

Secondly, the magnitude of the interviews they're requesting, and the fact that Payton agreed to interview after Glazer said it wouldn't happen tells me this isn't just a smokescreen.  They are trying to hit a home run.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

On one hand, it could just be due diligence.  On the other, I just don't think you go to these lengths and this amount of interviews if you felt you already had the right HC in place.  So, I'm assuming they're not gonna retain Wilks.  

Secondly, the magnitude of the interviews they're requesting, and the fact that Payton agreed to interview after Glazer said it wouldn't happen tells me this isn't just a smokescreen.  They are trying to hit a home run.

Might not be a smokescreen for us.

  • Beer 1
  • The D 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • By all indications, the surgery was "minor." I know with all surgeries and especially back surgery there can be complications, but I think the whole time Tremble did this with the expectation he would be able to be back for Week 1 It sounds like he will be ready to start back in team drills next week. He's a veteran who knows the system so I'm sure that helps. I still can't imagine he will play a normal workload early on though 
    • Maybe. He was pretty good in college before a bad injury. He had a good preseason last year as a UDFA in Washington and was on their practice squad all year so they obviously saw something worth developing. He signed a futures deal with the Panthers earlier this year, and everything about him has been increasingly positive. Tremayne has gotten a decent amount of time with the ones, and a lot with the twos for someone that doesn't have a chance. He's the only other 6'4" plus WR on the team, plays ST, and is a more natural backup to the X receiver position than David Moore. That was my thinking behind it. But he may well end up as one of the last roster cuts. If so, I do hope they can bring him back to the PS. But I personally think there's a good chance he could be claimed given his ST ability and what hes shown at WR.
    • That was my thought originally, but so many of the beat writers have mentioned keeping 7 WRs in conversations that I went with that, at least for the purposes of this projection. But you're right that historically defensive guys who were standouts at ST have tradionally gotten those last spots  
×
×
  • Create New...