Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Sam Darnold had the 13th worst QB win in NFL history if we measured passer rating


ENC Pantherfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

https://www.statmuse.com/nfl/ask/lowest-passer-rating-in-a-win-in-nfl-history#:~:text=6 teams are tied for,Giants on November 14%2C 1976.

 

Anyone wondering if this is the worse QB win in NFL history it is not. A 0.0 rating in a win has been done 8 times prior, however this is the worst QB win as far as passer since Rex Grossman achieved a 1.3 QB rating on December 3rd 2006 vs the Vikings. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

An ugly win counts just as much as a pretty win. Who cares what it looks like? A WIN is a WIN. 

 

I just don't understand this. Who spends 4 hours watching their favorite team win a football game, then complains about how it was won?

 

We beat a Divisional rival, at their place, and only lost 1 spot in the draft doing so. Triple win.

 

 

Edited by Gerry Green
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

An ugly win counts just as much as a pretty win. Who cares what it looks like? A WIN is a WIN. 

 

I just don't understand this. Who spends 4 hours watching their favorite team win a football game, then complains about how it was won?

 

We beat a Divisional rival, at their place, and only lost 1 spot in the draft doing so. Triple win.

 

 

James Franco Reaction GIFHere?

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

By every conceivable metric Sam Darnold is not an NFL starting quality quarterback. It's plain to see in his career that he doesn't have it. The only people supporting him now are stubborn fans who dug their hole with blind support.

A lot of these same fans for some reason really hated Cam Newton.

 

There is a whole lot of wrong in this post. You'd be hard pressed to find many ppl who want to resign Sam. But it must be fun throwing that out there.

 

As to the Cam thing. Who you fishing for with that bait?

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

There is a whole lot of wrong in this post. You'd be hard pressed to find many ppl who want to resign Sam. But it must be fun throwing that out there.

 

As to the Cam thing. Who you fishing for with that bait?

Looks like my post hit home.

  • Pie 1
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, frankw said:

Remember when we had an MVP and even he couldn't do enough to convince some people he was a franchise quarterback? Standards around here are now below the Earth's crust. We desperately need a real quarterback and an enema for this fanbase.

 

You really do have no compunction at all about insulting, basically, the whole fanbase do you? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

By every conceivable metric Sam Darnold is not an NFL starting quality quarterback. It's plain to see in his career that he doesn't have it. The only people supporting him now are stubborn fans who dug their hole with blind support.

A lot of these same fans for some reason really hated Cam Newton.

"Every conceivable metric" - except the ones from this season.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

And before yesterday he had a string of games that made him one of the best QBs in the league. People have bad games. He should not be our starter ... but damn, some of you just can't let it go. It's like you're trying to prove Sam is bad. We know he is. Or, you want to stand on your soap box and go, SEE I TOLD YOU! But you're speaking to like ... 1-3 guys on here lol.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Hello, soccer fans [crickets, tumbleweed flies by]. The World Cup kicks off in less than 2 weeks and, well, 🇺🇸USA USA USA🇺🇸 and all. We beat Senegal 3-2 yesterday in a tune-up friendly at BoA, with Christian Pulisic finally entering the scoring column.  How will we do in the World Cup once our tournament kicks off on the 12th? Well, there are 48 teams (assuming Iran is there) and it feels like one of two thing happens: we get grouped for the first time since '98, or we make it to the Round of 16 for the third time in the last four World Cups. I tried out the lottery for an Atlanta game and struck out, so yesterday was as World Cup as I'll get for in-person ($285/ticket for like Norway vs $39/ticket for USMNT right beforehand was a layup).  The U.S. has a travel-heavy schedule in group play, playing in LA, Seattle and LA. Real road warrior mentality being built. Glad the east coast gets worse kickoff times for a NA World Cup than a Qatar World Cup.
    • Well, that's the thing. Drafting players only for their physical measurables as you are suggesting only really happened during 2024, and X unfortunately has become the poster child for that. To be clear, it's not necessarily about drafting RAS over skill, but RAS over NFL-readiness and/or a solid body of work. Lots of players show skill in college, but those skills don't necessarily translate to the NFL for a multitude of reasons. But, getting back to the main point, to be clear, I believe that our FO is still enamored with physical gifts (who wouldn't be?), but now they're letting Dr. Eric Eager's proprietary system--his "secret sauce" prioritize the players that the Panthers draft, and it seems like it weighs not only a solid body of work, relative to a college career of course, but consistent gradual improvement as evidenced by production pretty highly. 
    • Its a good article about how pathetically bad our past drafts ('23 and '24) have been. Building the team in '23 since we weren't ready yet and taking your qb in '24 made so much more sense in hindsight. Ladd McConkey over XL is pretty much a given but not sure it does as much to change Bryce's trajectory as the author suggests.  As bad as '23 and '24 drafts were, the '25 and '26 really give me hope.  
×
×
  • Create New...