Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Fitt bringing Sexy back..


WOW!!
 Share

Recommended Posts

We have to come away with MINIMUM a vertical threat TE, WR and RB on the offensive side.  Not sexy but, DE, ILB and FS on the defensive side.  That's about the entire draft.  The very reason I want to TRADE BACK a time or two to pick up 2-3 more picks.  We simply do not have enough to fill what we need.  Still should get another LB (super thin now), slot WR, IOL and possibly a nickle corner. 

Can't get all that in 7 picks.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

We have to come away with MINIMUM a vertical threat TE, WR and RB on the offensive side.  Not sexy but, DE, ILB and FS on the defensive side.  That's about the entire draft.  The very reason I want to TRADE BACK a time or two to pick up 2-3 more picks.  We simply do not have enough to fill what we need.  Still should get another LB (super thin now), slot WR, IOL and possibly a nickle corner. 

Can't get all that in 7 picks.

There's free agency too.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

There's free agency too.

Yeah, about that.  I know they will toy with the numbers some, but re-signing Bozeman, probably Sam, Eddy, Foreman and a few other role players to keep in house is going to leave us with very little for outside FAs.  Remember we have only about $1M in cap and (-$14M) in effective cap. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Yeah, about that.  I know they will toy with the numbers some, but re-signing Bozeman, probably Sam, Eddy, Foreman and a few other role players to keep in house is going to leave us with very little for outside FAs.  Remember we have only about $1M in cap and (-$14M) in effective cap. 

This is the modern NFL era where the cap isn't real. We can restructure basically forever and kick the can basically forever. 

This is quite literally the new way to handle that. Especially with the cap expected to skyrocket in the next few seasons. 

It isn't just the Saints that do this. It's the norm.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

Yeah, about that.  I know they will toy with the numbers some, but re-signing Bozeman, probably Sam, Eddy, Foreman and a few other role players to keep in house is going to leave us with very little for outside FAs.  Remember we have only about $1M in cap and (-$14M) in effective cap. 

The Saints have been over the cap every year and still make splash signings. If you want to sign people you can make it work.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

The Saints have been over the cap every year and still make splash signings. If you want to sign people you can make it work.

And eventually you have to clear the books.  The Saints have to do monetary gymnastics every offseason to get a few good FAs.  Once their GM/ financial guys are eventually let go, the people replacing them will have a hell of a time getting their cap back into order. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

And eventually you have to clear the books.  The Saints have to do monetary gymnastics every offseason to get a few good FAs.  Once their GM/ financial guys are eventually let go, the people replacing them will have a hell of a time getting their cap back into order. 

I've been hearing how the Saints' cap issues are coming home to roost now for over a decade. It might be time to just admit that they're better at the accounting fugery than we are.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, kungfoodude said:

This is the modern NFL era where the cap isn't real. We can restructure basically forever and kick the can basically forever. 

This is quite literally the new way to handle that. Especially with the cap expected to skyrocket in the next few seasons. 

It isn't just the Saints that do this. It's the norm.

Well Payton jumped ship because of the quagmire the Saints are in and McVay is getting ready to bounce because of the same.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He had games where he was a top 10 QB that week, vs Saints, Falcons, Eagles, Chiefs, Bucs.  Amazing performances that I think show what he can do consistently.  
    • We both know there's more that goes into batted passes than just the height of the QB. Most people here have readily acknowledged this and there were numerous discussions about it before we drafted Young. But if you are presenting a POV that Bryce's height hasn't tied to issues with his footwork then there's nothing anyone is going to be able to say to sway you and you know this. Even beyond the footwork I recall a redzone play where Bryce couldn't see around his right tackle at all where a receiver was waiting practically alone in the end zone for a touchdown. There are real world circumstances that are going to show up over the course of the upcoming season and it's up to Bryce and Dave Canales to make adjustments and do anything they can to mitigate negative instances and yes that begins with Bryce's footwork again. Thanks for your time. Have a nice weekend.
    • I'm arguing that should those supposed deficiencies, like height or pocket footwork, be as consequential as you and others have claimed, then there would be a clear, observable impact in the data. That's not unreasonable. For example, batted passes are often used as a size-related concern (see: Baker Mayfield), yet Bryce ranked among the lowest in deflections at the line. If his stature is such a limitation, why isn't it showing up there? Or are you suggesting that's why his passing yards fall short of your expectations? If the latter, I would hope that you're not discounting yards left on the field due to drops (of which he led the league in).  Also, asking for specific, measurable benchmarks isn't aggression... it's accountability. If that feels uncomfortable, it might be worth reflecting on how much of your anti-Bryce argument is grounded in subjective perception rather than objective metrics. So, again: do you have any specific KPIs beyond total passing yardage, height, and weight that you consider relevant to evaluating whether a QB is top-10? If you want to add YPA and passing yards per game to those metrics, that's fair, just be clear about it. But let's not pretend that asking for clarity is some kind of provocation. I'm simply trying to understand the actual criteria... not just the vibes.
×
×
  • Create New...