Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

“I don’t think they draft a QB”


ncfan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, ncfan said:

Will Kunkle who covers the Panthers just said on WFNZ 

“I don’t think the Panthers draft a QB”  

“They don’t like any of the QBs that are expected to be available.  And do not want to move up for one of these guys.”

 

Can't say this until you AT LEAST have a coach, and OC on the staff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, pantherj said:

An anonymous source told me that we're interested in taking a WR at the 9th pick. "We just don't like the value for a QB at 9." said my anonymous source. No I won't name the source, not even after the draft is over. You'll never know my source.

My anonymous source specifically named your anonymous source and said he was a liar. 

Also said that your breath smelled like stale Cheetos. 

I'll never give up my source. I will never give up @Jeremy Igo

  • Pie 2
  • The D 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, mrcompletely11 said:

He doesnt, he just said as much in his last presser, he however forgot he traded up for him and supposedly had a first ground grade on him

 

fug fitterer

Yea maybe he wasnt thinking about it but when he said last year was a "nuts and bolts offensive draft" and this draft was going to be more sexy, that doesn't sound like he has a lot of faith in Corral doing much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Lobo said:

Jury is still out on Watson due to small sample size, Wilson is a different story. Il take my chances with an mvp who had no WRs and now (if they get him) would have WRs. 

I'm just not a big fan of the whole "doing what failed for others but this time it'll work" scenario.

Even less so when you consider that it would take a massive haul to get Jackson and he'd want a fully guaranteed contract despite his style of play being possibly more prone to injuries.

That's a little too much of a potential disaster for me.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Remember when this was supposed to be a really rich QB draft? Well maybe next year or next year or next year or next year?

We know what is gonna happen next year, a supposedly rich QB draft again, then college season will begin and the all of a sudden we will go from a QB rich draft to no one is worth a 1st round pick except  maybe that one guy. Every single year it is the exact same thing. 

We are never gonna solve our QB problem are we? Main reason I can never be excited for us to possibly make the playoffs. Because the person behind center is a continued liability. 

QB purgatory. I hate it.                         

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I'm just not a big fan of the whole "doing what failed for others but this time it'll work" scenario.

Even less so when you consider that it would take a massive haul to get Jackson and he'd want a fully guaranteed contract despite his style of play being possibly more prone to injuries.

That's a little too much of a potential disaster for me.

So what do you have in mind then, if they don’t draft a qb? 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • if  ANYONE actually goes & looks at the FACTS on rookie Qb's after 2 full seasons as a starter in the NFL & they are still well below average do they rarely ever actually become top tier Qb's & instead most likely either do not recieve a second contract & or become life long backups...just saying 
    • So he became GM and decided not to address the weakness in the QB room following one of the worst rookie QB performances in NFL history?  There were options last season other than signing Dalton to a 2 year deal. Brissett and Jones by a wide margin, both of whom outplayed Bryce, Wilson, Winston, hell even Rivers off the couch was more exciting at the QB position. The time to address the failure in the QB room was last year but instead people on the Huddle cheered when we brought Dalton back then cheered when we were able to get anything for him after they finally realized he was washed up like a few of had been saying all along and got poo'd for even mentioning.  This year, the options were more limited obviously, especially since we lost Icky. It changed the dynamic of our draft. I think we were stuck this year keeping Bryce, but i still think giving him a 5th year option for what has amounted to replacement worthy performance was the wrong move. Why guarantee 25m if you're planning to replace him? You think he's going to want to be a bridge QB? Hell no. He's going to want out and we'll end up cutting him if he has another lackluster season because no one is trading for him with that price tag.  Were there better options as far as production available. A couple. Were there guys available with more physical tools than Bryce, Pickett or Grier, you damn well better believe there were. I've been saying all along, you always keep looking for your 1b. Bryce has yet to prove he can be a starter. Keep looking for someone who may. Put competition in camp. Let the best QB lead the team. Stop settling for less than mediocre. 
×
×
  • Create New...