Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Johnson staying in Detroit


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Just now, Panthercougar68 said:

I’m starting to get the feeling that the trade compensation is not near as high as people think the Saints want. If they drag their feet I believe in 2024 there is no compensation what so ever because that’s when the contract expired.

kind of hoping all the Huddle rationalizing of the mccaffrey trade as getting “first round value” proves true

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Panthercougar68 said:

I’m starting to get the feeling that the trade compensation is not near as high as people think the Saints want. If they drag their feet I believe in 2024 there is no compensation what so ever because that’s when the contract expired.

I think it can be done with a 2nd and a 5th. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Pretty sure the compensation has already been agreed to if he already has an interview set up with us.

One thing that does concern me about all of that is, I was listening to local radio here in Ralegih about it and they said Tepper's reputation around the league at this point is essentially a "mark." And I hadn't really thought about it, but I'd agree.  They mentioned how if you become the object of his desire, he will pay/offer whatever it takes for his "shiny new toy."  And that is essentially what he did with Rhule.  It's what he's done with several mediocre QBs since jettisoning Cam at Rhule's dumbass direction...  so, he has definitely earned the reputation.  My concern is, the Payton thing may already be locked up because Payton, although interested in coaching for several teams, also wants to look out for his old friend and otganization, and get them the best compensation in the process...  I wonder if Tepper, once again, like he did imwith Rhule and Darnold, outbid himself in a silent auction for Payton's services and that sealed it.  Smh...

Yeah you’re right about the offer being established. But at least showed restraint during the Watson saga

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Aussie Tank said:

Yeah you’re right about the offer being established. But at least showed restraint during the Watson saga

I don’t think the asking price is going to be what people think. Peyton has the leverage. If he wants to be somewhere and the Saints don’t like the deal, he can just sit out and the Saints get no compensation at all. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Cdparr7 said:

I don’t think the asking price is going to be what people think. Peyton has the leverage. If he wants to be somewhere and the Saints don’t like the deal, he can just sit out and the Saints get no compensation at all. 

Hope so I do want this team to be fleeced before we pay for our QB 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

Your critique of Johnson...

Well for one, unrelated but Gase was also 36 when he got his first HC role.

Both came out of the NFCN. 

Both were various position coaches before becoming OCs.

Johnson was OC for 1 year.

Gase was technically OC for 2 years in Denver (but Manning was there so he was the real OC) then 1 year OC in Chicago. 

Both were/are being talked about as hot-poo OCs that are/were going to innovate the game.

I agree, their offense is different. Johnson’s is much less complex than what Gase ran. 

Also, what team that Johnson has been apart of (ever) had success in the NFL?

So in summary, the similarities to Gase were...

- Same age

- Coached in the same division

- Previously position coaches

- Short term coordinators

- Talked about as hot candidates

Yeah, none of that had any significance whatsoever.

Likewise, their previous teams were pretty meaningless. And as to your suggestion that Gase had a more complex offense, what research did you do that told you that?

(just pulled it out of your ass, I'm guessing)

You wanna dislike Johnson? Fine, but your argument that he's Adam Gase 2.0 is just goofy.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Um, no, just no. Bills, Chiefs, Chargers, Ravens, Bengals, Texans, Eagles, Commanders are 8 teams that it's not even a debate, they aren't trading their QB for Purdy. Patriots, Broncos, Titans, Giants, Bears, Vikings, Falcons are 7 more teams with QBs drafted in the last 2 years that also would rather stick with them than trade for Purdy as they all have more upside than he does. Lions, Packers, Cowboys, Bucs are 4 more that would likely keep their QB's as well, age aside for Goff, Dak, and Baker. Panthers and Colts are two teams in the same situation, QB's who have both struggled and shown flashes to where the teams probably stick with them because they drafted them, but in a re-draft of all QB's, they probably take Purdy over the guy they currently have. Jags, Cardinals, Dolphins, are 3 more with QB's who probably have a higher upside than Purdy but come with their own question marks, so debatable if they'd take Purdy over who they already have. That leaves Jets, Raiders, Steelers, Browns, Saints, Seahawks, and Rams. Rams would take him over Stafford for the future of course, but not for 2025, and I'd think the Seahawks would take him over Darnold, but honestly not sure if they would take him over Milroe at this moment as they really like his potential and have him for 4 years really cheap. That leaves 5 teams that I see who would absolutely take him over their current situation right now, and a handful of others who MIGHT take him over their current guy, a far cry from your 20.  
    • Agreed. Also as soon as they received the top pick in the next draft it was over. Bears won that trade. Gave up a top overall pick got one the next year plus pick 9, a couple 2nds, and DJ Moore a proven young WR. Had their 2024 pick from us be in the late teens or later it would be more debatable IMO. 
    • Option A:  Pay your starting QB starting QB money. Option B:  Look for a starting QB for 4-10 years (or longer) while wasting the talent at every other position.    How many of the top 20 QB's do you think are worth what they are being paid?   When you factor in the last year of his present deal his contract is really an average of 45 million per year which in today's QB market is a very, very good deal. I wish we'd had found a Brock Purdy to pay 50+ million a year right after we parted ways with Cam.  Ya'll go ahead and live in fairy tale land where good to great (much less elite) QB's are available to pay. Just the fact that they had the chance to pay Brock after the disaster of trading up for Lance is a testament that when you find a quarter back you can win with, complete in the playoffs and superbowls with, you pay him.  
×
×
  • Create New...