Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers in violation of NFL rules regarding their search for a permanent head coach, multiple sources tell CBS Sports.


SgtJoo
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, WarHeel said:

You and Aggie big mad

I can’t and won’t speak for esteemed poster @AggieLean, but I ain’t mad. Just shaking my head at the people in here who don’t understand why these programs are in place and are important.
 

@TheCasillasis right that these programs are flawed, but they sure as hell beat where we were many years ago and at least are trying to make difference in the way our work world is shaped now. 
 

As the only minority director within my company, I’ve watched and endured many a shitty video, but I can see in my practices that they actually do make a difference in my every day workflow, and I’m thankful I’m “forced” to take part. 
 

But you do you, WarHeel. I’ll do me and I’ll be proud of the way I interact with my fellow humans. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

If you are going down that road the question is did she actually violate any anti discrimination laws/rules during her interviews without the training. If she did then that’s a completely different scenario. If she didn’t get updated training that started in October 2022 and everyone else did, that just seems more like an oversight to me.

You are also talking about one person who (maybe) didn’t take this training while everyone else from Tepper himself to Fitt did. Tepper (in all his faults) seems like a pretty progressive owner IMO. I already mentioned the Eric Reid signing and there is also this. 

https://www.wsoctv.com/news/local/now-is-not-time-stay-silent-panthers-players-join-uptown-demonstrations/RBL2GCCTVBAEBORIYK6C6X7DLM/?outputType=amp

Not a bad take. But Oct 22 in the business world is a quarter ago and anyone in upper positions should be compliant with these changes, as a quarter is an eternity. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, mc52beast said:

Wondering what “inclusive hiring training” would consist of.

I can guarantee you it's a bunch of woke BS.  But when you buy a house in the subdivision you agree to follow the HOA BS rules.

And really. . . it's just a game.  A ridiculous game mind but still just a game.  Sure, you're going to interview "everyone". . .but you're still gonna hire who you're gonna hire.  Just play the damn game and part of playing the game is sitting through this BS training.

The training is a guilt-shaming tactic used to manipulate something you otherwise wouldn't have any power over.

Funny though that the person accused of not completing the training is as a woman probably otherwise considered a protected class status save for the fact she rich and married to the owner.  Shame on her.

But given they bought a house in the subdivision and didn't follow the HOA's rules, I'll be pissed if it costs us draft picks.

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

These trainings aren’t pointless. I did 20 in the navy and we had 10 or so similar trainings every year across various topics (the same thing every year for 20 years is excessive, but these one time trainings aren’t too much).
 

You never know how some people are raised or the environment they learned from, something that’s common sense to most might not be to someone and you don’t want that someone making decisions that might be lacking in what most would think is obvious, like you can’t exclude someone based on race, gender, etc.  So these trainings are important for establishing a baseline of what’s expected and setting a minimum standard for how things are expected to be done. 
 

What’s stupid is thinking this minor oversight on a brand new requirement is some big deal. It’s a nothing burger, they were informed months ago and subsequently forgot about it among the million other things they have to consider in owning a team among other business responsibilities.  They’ll learn from it and move on. 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, jayflip said:

I can’t and won’t speak for esteemed poster @AggieLean, but I ain’t mad. Just shaking my head at the people in here who don’t understand why these programs are in place and are important.
 

@TheCasillasis right that these programs are flawed, but they sure as hell beat where we were many years ago and at least are trying to make difference in the way our work world is shaped now. 
 

As the only minority director within my company, I’ve watched and endured many a shitty video, but I can see in my practices that they actually do make a difference in my every day workflow, and I’m thankful I’m “forced” to take part. 
 

But you do you, WarHeel. I’ll do me and I’ll be proud of the way I interact with my fellow humans. 

Interaction with other humans starts with training in the home. Grown people shouldn’t have to be taught how to treat others. And companies shouldn’t have to pander to anyone based on the color of their skin. Just my opinion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You guys are just going to have to accept the fact that Dan Morgan is a mid GM best case scenario currently. I used to have people get very belligerent over defending Scott Fitterer too. And that's not hyperbole. People used to go to bat for that guy like he was blood related. We have a truckload invested in the OL and what do we have to show for it? The whole unit is already banged up including one of our big signings. Even without all that the group has largely take a step back from last year in pass protection. Then you get to the QB room and there's only two conclusions you can make about Dan Morgan. Either he deliberately ignored it two years in a row on his own accord or he took orders from Tepper to do so. Either scenario says he's not fit to be an NFL GM.
    • Frank, ceding control of the defense in no way verifies that Tepper told Canales to bench Young.    It certainly buttresses the idea that Canales would need permission to bench him but that is as far as you can take it.    After that it is pure speculation and it doesn’t make sense. 
    • Uhh, okay yes that happened. I didn’t like the pick either I am a 3rd or later RB guy. Always. Actually hated the CMC pick too. Hated the Stewart pick.  No one wants to talk about trading the #39 in that draft and what he did with that.  Got #52, #155, and the Rams 2025 2nd to boot.   The 52 and 155 plus our 142 5th rounder to go up for a Brooks Everyone wants to forget about the 2025 2nd for that Rams trade  which was used to move up for Scourton.  That Rams trade down was a great deal for us.     
×
×
  • Create New...