Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

When will the Panthers hire a new HC?


kungfoodude
 Share

Guess away.  

56 members have voted

  1. 1. What day with the Panthers new HC be hired?



Recommended Posts

I think they will do a second round of interviews this week and make the decision early next week.  Tuesday's seems to be the day for big news in the Panthers organization (1/31).

I doubt the decision is made (public-- the organization may know by then) any earlier than this coming weekend. On the other hand, I don't think it comes any later than Super Bowl week--so no later than 2/6.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, 45catfan said:

I think they will do a second round of interviews this week and make the decision early next week.  Tuesday's seems to be the day for big news in the Panthers organization (1/31).

I doubt the decision is made (public-- the organization may know by then) any earlier than this coming weekend. On the other hand, I don't think it comes any later than Super Bowl week--so no later than 2/6.

I am curious to see who makes the cut if second round interviews are in order.

Also curious to see if any of our interviewees get poached by the time we make our decision. Whether they were in serious consideration here or not.

That is another interesting question that could be asked. Where in the order of available open positions will we fill our coaching vacancy?

 

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, t96 said:

SP on Friday. We sell him on coming here today but it takes some time to hammer out the trade negotiations with the Aints

As leaky as our organization is, I would expect that to be in the press quickly. One would wonder if that would lead to the cancelation of the Denver interview, as well. That would be a dead giveaway. 

I think the Payton process is going to be dragged out. There is no real rush on his part because he also has the option to spurn all the suitors and wait for a better deal next cycle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

54 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

I am curious to see who makes the cut if second round interviews are in order.

Also curious to see if any of our interviewees get poached by the time we make our decision. Whether they were in serious consideration here or not.

That is another interesting question that could be asked. Where in the order of available open positions will we fill our coaching vacancy?

 

You're on top of this.  Inside info?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...