Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

New Coach Thread 2: Electric Boogaloo


Ricky Spanish
 Share

Recommended Posts

10 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Maybe...

Kaye thinks if Steichen isn't the primary target, the Panthers could wrap things up within the week.

I think unless Steichen pulls out of the search, this thing goes to at least next week because we can't do a second interview with him until next Monday at the earliest.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, UNCrules2187 said:

I think unless Steichen pulls out of the search, this thing goes to at least next week because we can't do a second interview with him until next Monday at the earliest.

That's pretty much what Kaye expects, barring they don't decide they like someone else better.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, Proudiddy said:

Wow this is really taking a long time.

We're able to hire all but 2 right now.  Seems to be we're holding out for someone...my wildcard is Ryans comes back into the equation or we are simply gunning for Shane.

One of the two.  And if they don't work out, I think we're looking at Reich or Wilks.  

Most of this field just isn't smelling passing the smell test

Payton - NOPE

Moore - NOPE

Dorsey - NOPE

Kafka - NOPE

Caldwell - NOPE

Evero - NOPE (longshot?)

 

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, t96 said:

If this happens and we're out on Payton then I say give Wilks 1 year with an extremely short leash. If we don't make the playoffs with at least 10 wins and maybe even with that if we don't win a playoff game, see what options are out there next offseason. Not a fan of the other OCs or Reich. Tepper really should've just taken a shot on Harbaugh. Proven guy like SP but arguably better, without having to give up any draft picks to the Aints. Oh well, it ain't happening.

Wilks will never sign a one-year contract and the Panthers would never foolishly offer him that. It will be Arizona all over again - a PR nightmare a deterrent for any future hires and sends the wrong message to the team and the fans. He’ll get the standard 3-4 years if offered the job and that’s fair. Give the man a chance to succeed. 

And Harbaugh was never coming here. There’s no reason to believe he was ever leaving Michigan. Let’s move on.
 

 

Edited by Prowler2k18
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Bear Hands said:

We're able to hire all but 2 right now.  Seems to be we're holding out for someone...my wildcard is Ryans comes back into the equation or we are simply gunning for Shane.

One of the two.  And if they don't work out, I think we're looking at Reich or Wilks.  

Most of this field just isn't smelling passing the smell test

Payton - NOPE

Moore - NOPE

Dorsey - NOPE

Kafka - NOPE

Caldwell - NOPE

Evero - NOPE (longshot?)

 

 

We're not doing any more initial interviews if you believe the team so Ryans isn't an option:

Quote

 

CHARLOTTE — The Panthers added another name to the interview list Tuesday when Cowboys offensive coordinator Kellen Moore became the ninth to meet with the team about the head coaching job.

That follows a busy few days, as they interviewed former Saints head coach Sean Payton on Monday, Giants offensive coordinator Mike Kafka on Sunday, and Bills offensive coordinator Ken Dorsey on Saturday.

They had previously interviewed Broncos defensive coordinator Ejiro Evero, Eagles offensive coordinator Shane Steichen, former Colts head coach Frank Reich, interim head coach Steve Wilks, and started the process with former Colts and Lions coach Jim Caldwell.

That concludes the first round of interviews, and the team plans to conduct a second round before making a decision.

 

https://www.panthers.com/news/panthers-head-coach-interview-tracker-2023-candidates

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Byrdman4real said:

Two years should be the max for Wilks, until he can prove more. 

Tepper: OK,  Wilks, we could not find anyone we really liked (who would come here) so we  are giving you 1 (or 2 years) because we are hoping that someone we like better will be available later on.

Wilkes: No thank you.

How are you going to attract good assistant coaches or even free agents in a situation like that even if he did accept?

Not a good plan.

  • Pie 6
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

Tepper: OK,  Wilks, we could not find anyone we really liked (who would come here) so we  are giving you 1 (or 2 years) because we are hoping that someone we like better will be available later on.

Wilkes: No thank you.

How are you going to attract good assistant coaches or even free agents in a situation like that even if he did accept?

Not a good plan.

Wilks isn't attracting good assistant coaches in the first place. 

Here's an alternative:

Tepper: Wilks, I don't think we're going to hire you because you punted the ball twice at midfield on 4th and 1 in a must-win game.

Wilks: Ok.

Tepper: Best of luck.

---

A 2 year deal is more than fair for Steve Wilks.

Edited by therealmjl
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, therealmjl said:

Wilks isn't attracting good assistant coaches in the first place. 

Here's an alternative:

Tepper: Wilks, I don't think we're going to hire you.

Wilks: Ok.

Tepper: Best of luck.

---

A 2 year deal is more than fair for Steve Wilks.

Giving a minority candidate less than a standard coaching deal?

I'm guessing the lawyers for Wilks and Brian Flores would probably have something to say about that.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Regardless of how we got here, any rational fan should be excited by how well Bryce played down the stretch. Anyone not happy about that level of play either doesn't know what they're looking at, or they're still trying to drive tired narratives. Obviously, Cam had an all-time rookie season, and I'm not putting the two in the same basket yet, but as someone who has watched every snap of Panthers football since the start of the new millennium (Im old), Bryce was playing at a higher level at the end of 2024 than Cam was at the end of 2012 (his 2nd season). Cam continued to develop into MVP form, something Bryce has to prove, but as someone who watched both (and will stan for Cam always), Bryce was playing at a higher level to end year 2 than Cam did.  Go watch the film if you dont believe me. None of that means anything for the future. But the people who said BY9 couldnt play in this league are wrong.   That being said, the only thing that matters is this year. #20 is perfectly fair IMO going into the season. I mean think about it, how would you rank him??!  His in-season turnaround is one of the wildest things I've ever seen... how do you rank a guy who looked like a massive bust in September and by January was consistently playing at a top 10 level? My excitement level is pretty damn high heading into this season. There were throws from the Chiefs game onward where Bryce had Drew Brees levels of anticipation. Im excited to see what he can do with a full deck on offense, something we really never gave Cam. Really hope and expect Bryce to move up this list this season.  
    • Not really, the only QB's (other than Anthony Richardson) ranked below him are new to their teams as a placeholder starter or drafted in 2024 or 2025, not a lot of gymnastics to get there. It's not about how many that is, if it's 20, 12, or 2... It means there isn't a QB who's team has committed to them for the long term right now that they have ranked below Bryce. That's not a great thing.
    • The changes to onside kicks were ridiculous and ruined a significant part of the game     It was already a high risk low reward play.  Why change it?
×
×
  • Create New...