Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your unpopular opinion?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

Your point “A” and also Steve Wilks is not a good coach. We just had the bar so insanely low from Rhule that we thought he was good but in reality he is average at best and a good coach would’ve gone 8-4 or better with our roster and joke of a schedule. 

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Truly unpopular? Rasul Douglas should have had a 3-4 year extension/new contract.  WIth all the complaining about contracts for our D, he would've solidified the outside and we could've gotten way more aggressive with QB.  Would have been easy to let Jackson go.  Totally change the current build.

  • Pie 5
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

I see the comments daily.

 

Some guys brought up Cam not jumping on the ball in the game thread because Josh Johnson didn't dive on the ball.

We never see Luke Kuechly slander. Never see TD slander. Hell you don't even see Smitty slander and he was a ticking time bomb.

Stop trying to look for any slight to defend.  Why do you care if Cam doesn't? Stop worrying about what others think and grow the hell up.

  • Pie 7
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Teams do some super stupid stuff with mid-fairly good QBs. I think they are just absolutely terrified they will be stuck with a QB that is not the quality of the QB they have now, even if its someone like Daniel Jones. Lots of trash QBs go in the first round. I encourage you to take a look at the sad, sad list of first round QBs in the last 15 years.  
    • No, it will be a raw 6'7" 17-year-old European who just played basketball for the first time in March and who the idiot GM "had first on our board." He'll play the whole G-League season, get in 42 games for the Hornets and average 1.1 ppg on 35% shooting. Been there, seen that.
    • We missed on Burns at his peak value. That’s the problem with trading for picks 2-3 years away (which people were convinced the Rams would suck by now and these would be higher picks btw). Each year away the pick is the further in value it drops. Fitt was clearly hired based on turning us around quickly. It’s one of the many reasons tanking isn’t really a thing as our player JJ is telling you in this original article. It would take the whole organization from the owners down admitting they aren’t winning soon with Burns and picks 2-3 years away having more value because that’s when we are still rebuilding. It would only make sense if Fitt had a longer leash and would more than likely be the ones making these picks anyway which you wouldn’t want. The question is would you rather have those Rams picks with the strong possibility of Fitt still being here or would you rather Fitt try to “win now” like he did and expedite his firing? Altering the timeline would affect more than just the Rams picks. 
×
×
  • Create New...