Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

What is your unpopular opinion?


Cdparr7
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, SOJA said:

That until we find a franchise QB we will be irrelevant. You would think this is actually a popular opinion but there are actually human beings who don't think going after Bridgewager, Darnold and Baker were bad moves even in hindsight. 

 

Matt Rhule set this franchise back YEARS with his terrible management and decision making. Again this should be a popular opinion but it is debated

So the popular opinion is to double down on that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Got a couple..

-Jake Delhomme is still very overrated in our franchise and should have been replaced BEFORE his Tommy John injury

-We fudged over DeAngelo Williams' career (Sat him behind Deshaun Foster for 2 years/wasted his prime behind Tommy Jone Delhomme and Jimmy Clausen)

-Julius Peppers is the best Panthers player 

-Chris Gamble is extremely underappreciated; top 4 Panthers player ever

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, AceMan said:

Got a couple..

-Jake Delhomme is still very overrated in our franchise and should have been replaced BEFORE his Tommy John injury

-We fudged over DeAngelo Williams' career (Sat him behind Deshaun Foster for 2 years/wasted his prime behind Tommy Jone Delhomme and Jimmy Clausen)

-Julius Peppers is the best Panthers player 

-Chris Gamble is extremely underappreciated; top 4 Panthers player ever

I can get behind this. 
 

Delhomme in the 4th quarter was his saving grace though. 

F1588F60-5506-4ACC-8F0A-17EB9530F7AB.jpeg

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, SOJA said:

That until we find a franchise QB we will be irrelevant. You would think this is actually a popular opinion but there are actually human beings who don't think going after Bridgewager, Darnold and Baker were bad moves even in hindsight. 

 

Matt Rhule set this franchise back YEARS with his terrible management and decision making. Again this should be a popular opinion but it is debated

Actually Tepper set this franchise back and not just with Rhule. With Hurney and now with Rhule’s GM. Also with himself. He thinks he can make decisions. He can’t.

This is LITERALLY what the 49ers went through until the owner stepped back and hired help, and took hands off approach.

I mean Tepper literally just had a vote for his HC…including severely under qualified people when considering qualifications for hiring a HC. And that’s being nice.

You would think THIS would be a popular opinion but I’ve learned a majority of this board only watches the Panthers and are in a tunnel, and that change from when they do bad is always a good thing and brings hope. Even when it’s from the same source. 

Hope isn’t a strategy though and general NFL enthusiasts know until Tep takes his hands off, it’s not good. The fact moves like keeping Rhule’s GM are a good idea and Tepper is going to turn around the ship on his own despite solidifying the worst stretch in 30 years  is not even debated but given the benefit of the doubt/accepted as truth absolutely dumbfounds me.

And thus, we need a franchise QB so badly to bail us out. This is why my opinion has changed from not wanting to trade assets to trading the future and move up for one.

Edited by onmyown
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, onmyown said:

Actually Tepper set this franchise back and not just with Rhule. With Hurney and now with Rhule’s GM. Also with himself. He thinks he can make decisions. He can’t.

This is LITERALLY what the 49ers went through until the owner stepped back and hired help, and took hands off approach.

I mean Tepper literally just had a vote for his HC…including severely under qualified people when considering qualifications for hiring a HC. And that’s being nice.

You would think THIS would be a popular opinion but I’ve learned a majority of this board only watches the Panthers and are in a tunnel, and that change from when they do bad is always a good thing and brings hope. Even when it’s from the same source. 

Hope isn’t a strategy though and general NFL enthusiasts know until Tep takes his hands off, it’s not good. The fact moves like keeping Rhule’s GM are a good idea and Tepper is going to turn around the ship on his own despite solidifying the worst stretch in 30 years  is not even debated but given the benefit of the doubt/accepted as truth absolutely dumbfounds me.

I think a lot of Scott’s sins were hidden behind Rhule’s incompetence. Wouldn’t be surprised if they show themselves more this offseason. The question is will Scott get the axe before he takes Reich down with him.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Cdparr7 said:

I think a lot of Scott’s sins were hidden behind Rhule’s incompetence. Wouldn’t be surprised if they show themselves more this offseason. The question is will Scott get the axe before he takes Reich down with him.

Indeed, we will see and it will probably take two seasons, but Fitt is and was hired as a yes man. Clearly. A GM worth his salt isn’t going to say yea I’ll come work for a CEO Baylor coach and just do the paperwork. 

Tepper can bark all day long about how he loves people who argue/disagree with him but he 100% does NOT. That is why Harbaugh and Payton are not his type of coaches. Too vocal. Too knowledgeable.

Nevertheless, I digress, getting the axe before Reich just starts the whole cycle over again. And by cycle I mean Tepper’s embarrassing assbackward dynamic of owner/GM/coach.

Owners hire GMs with help and insight and the GM hires the HC, HC hires staff. That’s normal.

Hurney hires Rhule, Rhule hired Fitt, now we have Fitt hiring Reich (actually I think a bunch of people voted on it really) and if Fit goes what’s next? Lol more shenanigans from path maker Tepper and co.

 

Edited by onmyown
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

This is coming from a MJ fan.

 

I love MJ but Lebron is simply bigger, stronger, faster. MJ is too small to guard him.

 

6'6 215 MJ vs 6'9 250 Lebron it's not a fair matchup.

2 different eras of basketball. 

2 different ways the game was played, different in the way its called, and different in the way teams are built. 

MJ changed the game. LeBron is playing on the foundation MJ built. Not taking anything away from Lebron's skills, but if I had to build a team around 1 or the other, I'd take MJ 10 out of 10. I'd take Kobe over LJ too. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 2/8/2023 at 1:37 PM, CamWhoaaCam said:

Lebron is bigger, faster, stronger than MJ.

If they played one on one in their prime Lebron would bully him.

For about 3 minutes.

Then a champion mentality will overcome a flopping mentality.A lot of people were bigger faster stronger.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • The era that you played in, and, more importantly, who you played with actually matters. Honestly, that's why these issues will be debated forever, as it's just difficult to say that this person or that person is better when you're discussing the passage of time. As for me, after Rice, Moss and maybe Megatron and T.O., there's probably a dozen or so guys that can be argued about to the cows come home. Personally, I'm not putting Fitz, Harrison, Johnson, Evans, or especially D-Hop, Jefferson, Chase or Hill definitely in front of Smitty (and Colston ain't even in the discussion). Context and all that stuff actually matters. Things like the triple crown matter. 
    • Some of those guys? Yeah honestly you can.  I would 100% take Steve Smith over Larry Fitzgerald, Harrison, even Mike Evans. He is 100% a better player than those guys in his prime. If you look at the numbers Smith is historically under targeted in comparison to his contemporaries. He was only targeted 150 times or more only once in his career. Fitzgerald for example was targeted well above that 9 different seasons. Had Smith played with Peyton, Brady, Greatest Show on Turf, or even with Warner in Arizona he would broken records. His 2008 season was ridiculous accumulating 1400 yards in 13 games on less than 80 receptions. All time he also lost a season due to injury in 04, barely played WR as a rookie. Got robbed of 1k season with Clausen. Thats easily another 1800yds minimum that should have been tacked on to his #s. The only guys I’d say for certain are better than Smith are Rice, Moss, TO, Megatron, Julio Jones, Antonio Brown.
    • I parked in this lot a few times. It would take over and hour to get out of that lot after games. Never again
×
×
  • Create New...