Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Who do you want? (Public Poll)


Brooklyn 3.0
 Share

Who do you want? (Public Poll)  

163 members have voted

  1. 1. Who do you want the Panthers to draft in the 2023 NFL Draft?



Recommended Posts

At what draft pick?  1, 5  or stay at 9. And at what price? This year's 1 and next year's 1 to move up or the ridiculous talk about 3  1s and maybe more.  How did that work for SF with Lance. I would rather give up a 2nd for Fields and give him a proper offense that mortgage  a bunch of 1sts for Stroud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

At what draft pick?  1, 5  or stay at 9. And at what price? This year's 1 and next year's 1 to move up or the ridiculous talk about 3  1s and maybe more.  How did that work for SF with Lance. I would rather give up a 2nd for Fields and give him a proper offense that mortgage  a bunch of 1sts for Stroud.

Lance was the ultimate high risk/high reward pick.  He had 1 year of good play at a nobody school in Division 1AA. His athletic tools were there, which is why he went so high.  All the QBs, minus AR, at least have a large body of work against high level college talent.  Even AR did it in the SEC this year.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, joemac said:

Lance was the ultimate high risk/high reward pick.  He had 1 year of good play at a nobody school in Division 1AA. His athletic tools were there, which is why he went so high.  All the QBs, minus AR, at least have a large body of work against high level college talent.  Even AR did it in the SEC this year.  

Truth is that there are lots of quarterbacks who can be developed who aren't high picks. We have seen a number of guys who were forced into action like Purdy for SF. To the point that spending a ton on any college player has to be weighed against finding someone you can develop with similar athletic tools.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't want to give up too much for a QB.  That results in not being able to get the pieces around him that will help him be successful. How many high draft pick QBs have gone to bad teams and then struggled?  I am going to trust our new staff to evaluate and find good talent at the QB position, as well as other positions and ..then develop them. We might have to be patient.  As good as he is, Andy sat Mahomes for a year. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, panthers55 said:

Truth is that there are lots of quarterbacks who can be developed who aren't high picks. We have seen a number of guys who were forced into action like Purdy for SF. To the point that spending a ton on any college player has to be weighed against finding someone you can develop with similar athletic tools.

Very true.  Just so happened in Big Cock Brocks case, that he stepped into a very complete team, with a great, QB friendly system, and an innovative head coach.  SF is proof that coaching and scheme are HUGE factors in the success of a young QB. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Kyler Murray is 5'8 

His height is not that big of a concern it's his weight and frame.

Batted balls are not a concern?  Height, weight and frame are all concerns. Like I said earlier, if Young and AR-15 could magically switch bodies, I'd be all in on trading up for Young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Fan Nation is a site that produces NFL content from current and former players, coaches, and executives. They too, are getting in the mock draft game, because why not?

In their latest mock draft, they project the Carolina Panthers to make a trade with the Seattle Seahawks to move up to the fifth overall pick to select Ohio State quarterback C.J. Stroud.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • When I arrived at college, I was 18, not too much younger than some of these draft picks.  It was not a huge school, but there were guys on the team who were 21, 22, 23....playing ahead of me.  I was seventh on the depth chart.  Those guys have been through a few seasons, were stronger, more knowledgeable.  I was a better raw player than some of them, but those other factors matter.  As I grew stronger, more familiar with the playbook, and learned what it was like to play in college, I gradually improved and with that, I rose up the depth chart.  It took most of my freshman year for the light to come on.  Had the coach thrown me into the starting lineup day 1, I would have probably failed.    And that was college.  So I agree with you based on my experience on a much lower level.  Frankly, I think that is why so many kids drafted to fill huge gaps bust.  The teams are desperate.  Anyone who looks to fill vacancies in the starting lineup through the draft is desperate.  You draft depth to develop.  For this reason, I say, "Let Walker start for a while."  Maybe Brazzell can be our WR 4.  Throw Hunter into a rotation and ask him to do one or two things.  Freeling needs some strength and he needs to work on run blocking.
    • I see Bryce's development this way: He improved when his supporting cast improved.  TMac and Dowdle saved his arse last year, but in fairness, most good QBs have good WRs and good RBs--and good OLs.   The 2025 OL underperformed, actually. They were above average, but they should have been elite if you consider the salary cap.   As soon as we signed Lewis and Hunt, I started thinking, "That's not sustainable.  With Ickey about to get paid a LT salary, Moton and Hunt grabbling $50m per season combined, and Lewis around $17m--that would be nearly $100m and the Center just walked.  Yikes.  What does that mean?  Rico walks, Mays walks, and we do not have a top 5 WR on a second contract.  We do not have an elite TE, and only 1 is on a modest second contract. And now Bryce will demand $50m for his incremental rise to mediocrity?   So when we sign Bryce, we will get weaker at other positions.  Hunt, Moton, maybe Ickey and Lewis, will all be casualties--that is the right move regardless (not sure yet about Ickey, but he was not elite) Bryce is one lucky, entitled camper.  No competition since being drafted, and he lost his job for a while to the aging clipboard holder.  Now we are bringing in UDFAs and busts to compete with him.  
    • Probably not.  If we are taking a QB, it would be a prospect to replace Bryce and not a flyer type player.  I can't say for sure, but I doubt he would have cracked the top 3-4 QBs even if he were to play this coming season.  
×
×
  • Create New...