Panthers favoring Levis?

[Mr. Scot]

From an impromptu Q&A session by Mike Kaye...

 

[Tarheel119]

7 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

From an impromptu Q&A session by Mike Kaye...

 

The issue is I don’t think Levis is there at 9. The only one I see there is Richardson.

[Panthers Fan 69]

AR15 is our guy. Big strong mobile.   Can sit a year behind Corral. 

[OldhamA]

2 hours ago, Panthers Fan 69 said:

AR15 is our guy. Big strong mobile.   Can sit a year behind Corral. 

If he's sitting a year behind Corral he's not your guy.

[AU-panther]

8 hours ago, kungfoodude said:

TBH, I would just prefer not to gamble in the top 10. 

But I will trust the new head coach to try and develop whomever we end up with. I just hope we just aren't continuing this very Cleveland Browns-esque QB journey in three years.

Whats the alternative? Sooner or later yiu have to gamble.  Unless you have that #1 pick, and it just happens to be the rare year there is a Luck or Lawrence type of prospect it’s almost always a gamble.

We could  go more tank mode and increase our chance of what is perceived as a better prospect but that doesn’t seem to be the path they want to go.

Last year you kept saying you didn’t want to gamble because this year had better prospects. 
I'm not saying totally waste a pick on a guy you don’t have faith in but for the most part you have to gamble sooner or later.

 

[Panthering]

I’m not a big fan of Levis from what I’ve seen but idk 

[kungfoodude]

6 hours ago, AU-panther said:

Whats the alternative? Sooner or later yiu have to gamble.  Unless you have that #1 pick, and it just happens to be the rare year there is a Luck or Lawrence type of prospect it’s almost always a gamble.

We could  go more tank mode and increase our chance of what is perceived as a better prospect but that doesn’t seem to be the path they want to go.

Last year you kept saying you didn’t want to gamble because this year had better prospects. 
I'm not saying totally waste a pick on a guy you don’t have faith in but for the most part you have to gamble sooner or later.

 

The issue this year is cost. It will cost quite a bit to get one of the top two guys in this draft. It's a better class overall(especially at the top) but the cost will be quite high to get to that point.

[AU-panther]

6 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

The issue this year is cost. It will cost quite a bit to get one of the top two guys in this draft. It's a better class overall(especially at the top) but the cost will be quite high to get to that point.

So pick one of the other guys.  That’s my point, if you are waiting for a sure thing, it might never happen.

[FattyFatFat]

At this point, who gives a poo. Take every QB. fug it. One of ‘em will pan out. 

[Jackie Lee]

I have much to say but I don't want to jinx our team

[kungfoodude]

5 hours ago, AU-panther said:

So pick one of the other guys.  That’s my point, if you are waiting for a sure thing, it might never happen.

Picking a guy with a 2nd round or lower grade in the top ten has a very unsuccessful history. That is how you start fuging up a draft.

[SZ James (banned)]

37 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Picking a guy with a 2nd round or lower grade in the top ten has a very unsuccessful history. That is how you start fuging up a draft.

Good thing that doesn’t apply to anyone being considered 

[kungfoodude]

2 hours ago, SZ James (banned) said:

Good thing that doesn’t apply to anyone being considered 

Not every team will have 1st round grades on these QB's. Positional value moves QB's up substantially, sometimes regardless of the evaluations.

[travisura]

Weren't folks last year saying that there could be 2-3 QBs taken in the top 10? I found a mock draft from last year with 5 QBs going round 1. Fans and pundits overvalue QBs, teams don't.