Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers land Evero as DC


UNCrules2187
 Share

Recommended Posts

19 hours ago, tukafan21 said:

Ugh, was just looking at that new rule, he might be TOO good of a hire for us to take advantage of it lol.

The coach needs to be a DC/OC for you for 2 years before getting a HC job for you to get the draft picks, so if he gets an HC job next year, we get nothing unfortunately.

Can't we sign him for a 2 year deal and not give him permission to interview?  Though it would probably cause a riff. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, DaveThePanther2008 said:

Can't we sign him for a 2 year deal and not give him permission to interview?  Though it would probably cause a riff. 

No way you can prevent a coach from being able to interview for a "better" position, and even if you could you would never even bring it up when you are trying to land the best DC available in Evero.

This is a GREAT get for the Panthers!

Hope springs eternal!

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, UNCrules2187 said:

One of the big positives that led Evero to taking this job was apparently the ability to build his own staff on the defensive side of the ball. I wouldn't be surprised to see some folks from Denver join him. Also given Capers was a senior defensive assistant on Denver's staff last season and his ties to the franchise, wouldn't be surprised to see him come back here in that same role.

We have alot of exciting young talent on this team, defensively.  I would assume he is going to have alot of fun utilizing them.  

If we somehow get the QB position straight we might actually be a team to talk about next season.  Pull a 2021 Cincinnati.  Worst to First. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

57 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

No more getting carved up by the Trubisky's of the world. Those guys are supposed to be folding under pressure, not dinking and dunking on a prevent defense in the 1st quarter

Still can’t believe we lost to a Trubisky-led Steelers at home. But I digress - happier times ahead!

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

43 minutes ago, Prowler2k18 said:

Still can’t believe we lost to a Trubisky-led Steelers at home. But I digress - happier times ahead!

Not to be a Debbie downer but the Broncos did get beat by a Mayfield led offense badly . 2 passing TD’s, 3 more rushing and 3 FG’s. 44 total offensive points.

We also beat them with Darnold at the helm last year too!

I have read multiple articles and seen just about every interview and press conference featuring Evero. There’s certainly reasons to be excited and the fact that he was interviewed for every H.C opening counts for something.

I’m very hopeful that games like that were more of a reflection of the broncos lack of talent on defense, more so than on his coaching or play calling.

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, Mr. Scot said:

Or offensive schemes, or...well, anything 😕

Tepper hires the coaches, does he not? Tepper owns the team, right? Yes and yes? Then yeah, he does have some input in the schemes being run. If the team feels like it can work, great. I just don't see how you plug the holes you've now created on defense and reserve the possibility to trade up and get a QB, as has been suspected here. 

You're likely going to have to go with Richardson, which I'm cool with. But then you're taking a 0 tech, a 3 tech 3-4 type end, and probably another edge rusher who can set the edge on the first two downs. Whereas if you stuck with a 4-3 you're taking BPA.

So this is a lot bigger deal than people here are understanding. Perhaps the blinders will come off in September. Or maybe you guys don't remember 2019 when we were changing back to a 3-4 scheme.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, panther4life said:

Not to be a Debbie downer but the Broncos did get beat by a Mayfield led offense badly . 2 passing TD’s, 3 more rushing and 3 FG’s. 44 total offensive points.

We also beat them with Darnold at the helm last year too!

I have read multiple articles and seen just about every interview and press conference featuring Evero. There’s certainly reasons to be excited and the fact that he was interviewed for every H.C opening counts for something.

I’m very hopeful that games like that were more of a reflection of the broncos lack of talent on defense, more so than on his coaching or play calling.

 

 

I see you didn’t watch Denver and Russell W this year he was he threw three picks that game and the backup qb played threw another pick. You want your defense to pitch a shut out with four different change of possession plays. That’s just one game Russell did that all year to his team and the D held it down.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, CPcavedweller said:

Tepper hires the coaches, does he not? Tepper owns the team, right? Yes and yes? Then yeah, he does have some input in the schemes being run. If the team feels like it can work, great. I just don't see how you plug the holes you've now created on defense and reserve the possibility to trade up and get a QB, as has been suspected here. 

You're likely going to have to go with Richardson, which I'm cool with. But then you're taking a 0 tech, a 3 tech 3-4 type end, and probably another edge rusher who can set the edge on the first two downs. Whereas if you stuck with a 4-3 you're taking BPA.

So this is a lot bigger deal than people here are understanding. Perhaps the blinders will come off in September. Or maybe you guys don't remember 2019 when we were changing back to a 3-4 scheme.

Per Albert Breer, when the time came to take a poll among the search committee on who was the preferred head coach candidate, Tepper abstained; specifically because he didn't want to influence anybody else's vote.

So no, It's not...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, trucpfan said:

I see you didn’t watch Denver and Russell W this year he was he threw three picks that game and the backup qb played threw another pick. You want your defense to pitch a shut out with four different change of possession plays. That’s just one game Russell did that all year to his team and the D held it down.

I didn’t watch it. I’m just stating facts.

The Rams offense put 44 points, 388 yard of offense, 14 passing 1st downs. Over 9 total drives.

They also had drives that included going ,60,75 and 90 yards for TD’s

Plus 60 and 68 yard drives for FG’s.

Thats still 27 points where they earned all of it.  

1 of those 4 picks you mentioned was returned for a TD, so did nothing for field position to help the rams, another was a touchback.

The other 17 of the 44 points that offense put up on them were still earned and saw next to 0 resistance by the broncos Defense.

 

Edited by panther4life
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I see they blamed Slavin for the goal like I did. 
    • See this is the problem, you say "can't get off the line quick" and "can't separate quick" but in reality it's "he can get off the line better and create more separation" which are two completely different things. If he couldn't get off the line or separate, he wouldn't have put up the numbers he did and end up a Top 10 pick. But he can get better, and maybe more accurately, consistent with them both, and that will take his game to the next level.  These are things that are also much easier to improve once you get to the NFL than things like being a poor route runner or having bad hands, two of his strengths. Thinking he can't get open in the short passing game also shows you haven't watched enough tape on him, as he was used in that role so much in college with little issue getting open and making plays. And him not using his physicality as much isn't even something that hurts his game because he's so much more agile than a player of his size should be, which he used to his advantage.  Instead of throwing passes where he'd go up and box out a player like a TE or Mike Evans does, they use his athleticism and put the ball in places that only he can get to it, and he usually does (and yes, he'll still be able to do that against NFL DB's with his catch radius). But now that he's in the NFL, I'd like to see him get stronger and add that to his game because it also will help him take his game to another level. As I've said before, if he doesn't improve on those things at all, I think he's a Top 25 WR in this league, he's already that good.  But I think he'll improve on those things and be a perennial Top 10 WR and in his prime is considered and perform like Top 5 guy in some years. My expectations for him this year at 800 yards and 8 TDs (although I do think he'll get to 10 TDs) with a real chance at getting to 1,000.  But those expectations are because I think Thielen will lead the team in yards with close to 1k and XL/Coker each end up in the 500-600 range themselves, just too many mouths to feed this year for a rookie to dominate yardage, especially if we're running the ball well again. But if Thielen can't stay healthy or puts up sub 750 yards, then yea, my expectations for T-Mac likely shift to getting to 1k as a rookie.
    • Svech only 1 goal behind the guy they've pretty much already given the Conn Smythe to...
×
×
  • Create New...