Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Brian Burns if traded

razorwolf

By razorwolf,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

onmyown Grand Master

onmyown

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, kungfoodude said:

Burns peak value was probably the Rams offer. Sincerely hope I am wrong but that was an insane offer.

Maybe he is worth more as a bargaining chip than picks to trade up and get our QB.

Which would be a better move. Especially if it allows us to keep some first(s). 

It would be a bad move if we still give up ours picks in which case we could’ve salvaged some for the offer.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
kungfoodude Grand Master

kungfoodude

Posted
Posted
16 minutes ago, onmyown said:

Maybe he is worth more as a bargaining chip than picks to trade up and get our QB.

Which would be a better move. Especially if it allows us to keep some first(s). 

It would be a bad move if we still give up ours picks in which case we could’ve salvaged some for the offer.

 

I wish I could believe that but we probably just plain fuged that up. To be clear, I really like Burns but that price was franchise QB level.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WarPanthers89 Grand Master

WarPanthers89

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, pantherj said:

Coaches watched him do nothing in the TB game?

I don’t believe teams look at a player on a one game basis. The guy is 24 years old, improves tackles and sacks every year, and potential to keep getting better and better. He’s already a pro bowl player and had 17 tackles for loss with……..who else to game plan for at the other DE position?

All while switching defensive schemes what seems like year after year. If you are the opposing team do you ever double any other DE on our team? 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
pantherj Grand Master

pantherj

Posted
Posted
Just now, WarPanthers89 said:

I don’t believe teams look at a player on a one game basis. The guy is 24 years old, improves tackles and sacks every year, and potential to keep getting better and better. He’s already a pro bowl player and had 17 tackles for loss with……..who else to game plan for at the other DE position?

All while switching defensive schemes what seems like year after year. If you are the opposing team do you ever double any other DE on our team? 

Burns was shut down 1v1. Teams notice that. It matters.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Monday practice tweets

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      Jones got projected as the next Eli because they share a similar goofball, on the spectrum energy.  That's my theory.
    • CRA
      Monday practice tweets

      By CRA · Posted

      I didn't think underrated was the wildest statement. The passing and offensive command he showed in week 18 against Atlanta was as good as any QB that has ever played for this franchise.  I mean THAT part is wild.  Which plays into the overrated part.  End of regulation I don't think he even hit 200 yards passing.  I mean he had a very efficient day vs a weak defense.   As good as we have ever seen in Carolina?   
×
×
  • Create New...