Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

#1 CJ Trade

razorwolf

By razorwolf,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

heel31ok Experienced

heel31ok

Posted
Posted
5 hours ago, razorwolf said:

Just a question to anyone. 
 

I’ve read different places about what the colts would probably have to give up to move to #1 (23: 1st, 2nd, 5th; 24: 1st), but I figure the bears are going to want more draft capital than that! But if the bears would accept a offer of that magnitude I’d think I’d be willing to give up (2) 1st (23’ & 24’), 2nd (62), and 5th (148) to move up to #1! What is your opinion on this scenario?

 

Lol...absolutely not

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
53 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Yea, I’m just saying it probably would have taken #9, our second this year and all the Rams picks. Maybe more. 

We would have to use our future 1st round picks not the Rams. We could not trade those in this year's draft unless the rules have changed. But we would have the Rams picks for ourselves or possibly trade them in the draft of the year we received them for. If that makes sense?

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bythenbrs Grand Master

bythenbrs

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, Jay Roosevelt said:

A lot of timid fans on this board who are content with mediocrity, it seems. The same thing happened back in 2011 when half the board wanted us to draft Marcel Dareus over Cam Newton because of the risk involved.

They were wrong then. They're wrong now. Go get your franchise QB.

[The 49ers and Jets have entered the chat.]

Link to comment
Share on other sites
raleigh-panther Grand Master

raleigh-panther

Posted
Posted

So much depends on the movement of 

carr

rodgers 

jimmy g

once that clears, better picture 

the combine, too,  will be interesting if any of the top 4 are there 

I’ve wanted CJ or AR from the start.  It will be what it is   One has the goods and one can become the goods with maturity and coaching 

I’ll just say, if this experienced staff believes that who they pick is worth multiple picks, do it 

just do it 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
42 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

We would have to use our future 1st round picks not the Rams. We could not trade those in this year's draft unless the rules have changed. But we would have the Rams picks for ourselves or possibly trade them in the draft of the year we received them for. If that makes sense?

You’re going to have to fill me in on that rule. Never heard any restrictions given to certain picks. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
46 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

We would have to use our future 1st round picks not the Rams. We could not trade those in this year's draft unless the rules have changed. But we would have the Rams picks for ourselves or possibly trade them in the draft of the year we received them for. If that makes sense?

I don’t think this applies anymore. Once picks are acquired they can be used. Seattle can trade Denver’s pick at 5 if they please for example.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Shocker Grand Master

Shocker

Posted
Posted (edited)

If these teams ahead of us are smart they don’t take back a bunch of picks in this draft from the Panthers to move down.  This is a weak draft and if I am taking calls from the Panthers I want premium players or very high picks like 9, 40 or next years best picks in return 

Edited by Shocker
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
Jon Snow Grand Master

Jon Snow

Posted
Posted
5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

You’re going to have to fill me in on that rule. Never heard any restrictions given to certain picks. 

I'm not sure it's a league rule for certain but it has something to do with making the future pick be determined on the trading teams record and not the team it was originally traded from or some weird accounting trick.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Toomers Mentor

Toomers

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I'm not sure it's a league rule for certain but it has something to do with making the future pick be determined on the trading teams record and not the team it was originally traded from or some weird accounting trick.

I’ve never heard of any rule like that. The Texans traded pick 13 that they got from CLE for Watson in last years draft. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Icege
      Thomas Fletcher Didn’t Make It, But These Four Did

      By Icege · Posted

      The draft isn't a vending machine where you insert a pick, press A3, and out pops a franchise cornerstone. It’s more like a gacha game - you turn in a premium (or non-premium) ticket, hear the fun little jingle, and wait to see what you pulled... without knowing how strong it'll actually end up. League-wide, the average draft hits on about 30 - 40% of its picks when teams have a standard seven selections. So if you walk away with 3 - 4 real contributors... that's considered a solid class. Hitting on 4 out of 11 is right in that range. To be clear: this isn't some veiled endorsement of Tepper, Fitterer, or Rhule. It’s simply an honest accounting of which players from that class are still with the Panthers and heading into their fourth year - and thus outlasting the average NFL career. Just trying to lean more toward more critiquing with clarity, not just lighting it all on fire for the spectacle of the flames.
    • nogoodbum
      Potential changes to playoff seeding

      By nogoodbum · Posted

      Please do not forget that everything the NFL does is for the increase in revenue. If a big market team draws more money [ticket sales, betting revenue, TV ratings & etc.] when they play at home versus on the road in the playoffs, you can safely be sure the NFL knows & will act accordingly. Just like the draft lottery proposal, if the NFL can capture TV ratings for it, they will.
    • MHS831
      Tet Mcmillan Draft Week Doc

      By MHS831 · Posted

      For a WR, 6'4" 220 would be decent size--if you hit the 235 range, I imagine that it costs you speed. I think his speed was an issue. He ran a 4.48 at his pro day. At the combine, he weighed in at 219 (NFL.com).   Mike Evans weighed 225 as a rookie and is also 6'4".  He ran a 4.53 40.  My main and only concern about TMac is between his ears--and it could be nothing.  He seems a bit silly, and it seems that he is in celebration mode when I want him to be in "let's get to work" mode.  Again, some people are just like that, but when they put the helmet on, they get focused.  I want to see that "dawg" before I get overly excited.  The pick is growing on me, and if you broaden the scope to consider what was available in free agency and the draft, it makes sense.  I don't think we got lesser Edge rushers in the second and third rounds, frankly, than what we could have gotten in the first.
×
×
  • Create New...