Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Carr Watch


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

17 minutes ago, NanuqoftheNorth said:

I don't believe you have too much to worry about.

The Panthers have limited cap space with numerous needs to address. 

Drafting a QB and bringing in an affordable vet is most likely what they'll end up doing.

Possible, but salary cap space can be created if needed.

Can't create draft picks, of course. Those just have to be used wisely.

Edited by Mr. Scot
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

Possible, but salary cap space can be created if needed.

Can't create draft picks, of course. Those just have to be used wisely.

I mean you can create draft picks by trading players or future picks, it's just not in your control whether another team is interested in working with you

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

As was said on The Roar. Our ceiling with Carr is the Cousins Vikings. I have higher hopes and aspirations for this team then just making the playoffs and then getting beat by a team that can exploit Carrs weaknesses. 
Like what happens every time the Vikings make the playoffs. 

Edited by TLGPanthersFan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, WOW!! said:

Dan gets it!!!

Dan isn't saying anything anyone with half a football brain doesn't already know. We need to get the right QB of those that are available, if we choose to go QB in the draft. Whether or not we will be able to remains to be seen. So much depends on what Chicago will do and if they will try to maximize that pick and still get my guy. If I was Chicago, I'd be trying to sell 1 to Houston and 2 to Indy pitting them against Carolina. They end up at 4, still get a bunch of extra picks, and get either Anderson or Carter at 4. That would be a massive win for them, IMO. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Dan isn't saying anything anyone with half a football brain doesn't already know. We need to get the right QB of those that are available, if we choose to go QB in the draft. Whether or not we will be able to remains to be seen. So much depends on what Chicago will do and if they will try to maximize that pick and still get my guy. If I was Chicago, I'd be trying to sell 1 to Houston and 2 to Indy pitting them against Carolina. They end up at 4, still get a bunch of extra picks, and get either Anderson or Carter at 4. That would be a massive win for them, IMO. 

You missed the main point.. We need to draft and develop and stop with the bandaids!!!

We have to many QB developers on roster.. Finally a young and functional Oline.. And a young defense ready for the next step.. 

 

TAKE THE SHOT!!!

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

You missed the main point.. We need to draft and develop and stop with the bandaids!!!

We have to many QB developers on roster.. Finally a young and functional Oline.. And a young defense ready for the next step.. 

 

TAKE THE SHOT!!!

The bandaids were all under Rhule and you have to be able to get your guy. If Chicago plays it the way I suggested, Stroud and Young are gone. If Indy offers more for 1, both are gone. At that point, are we as confident in Levis or AR as a fit or being able to develop properly to pay 2 or3 1sts to move up to 3? I don't disagree with taking a shot as long as it's the right one. Rhule was all about the bandaids. Different coach, different rules now. 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, WOW!! said:

You missed the main point.. We need to draft and develop and stop with the bandaids!!!

We have to many QB developers on roster.. Finally a young and functional Oline.. And a young defense ready for the next step.. 

 

TAKE THE SHOT!!!

Band aids are a case by case basis.You dont just rule out a whole resource group.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It's rare enough for a running back to tear the same ACL twice. There's not much of a sample size on the recoveries. And of course Dobbins has missed a lot of time--he was injured twice. That number will drop as his career continues, and even if it doesn't, that doesn't necessarily mean it has anything to do with the prior injuries. Dobbins just started and played well for a playoff team all year until he was injured by a hip-drop tackle. Surely his ACL recoveries didn't contribute to his completely random foot injury caused by an illegal tackle? Again, I'm confused why everyone is being so definitive that there's 'very little chance' of any meaningful contribution ever when the greatest counterpoint ever played for us. Thomas Davis tore the same knee over and over again and was basically fine. As for the roster-building stuff, we'll see what happens with Chuba and Dowdle at the end of the year, but Etienne's not going to factor into this. Either Brooks comes back, in which case we've already seen more from him than we have from Etienne, or he doesn't. But Etienne's not forcing him off the team. If anything, Etienne's current role is his absolute floor.
    • Then I would assume disingenuous. Why on earth would you consider this an "exciting" time to be a Panthers fan? Let me ask this, how old are you and how long have you been an NFL fan?
    • An ESPN writer had a good breakdown of teams that were likely to come back to earth(KC and Redskins were two of them) based on outlier results in 2024 in close games. I think that has a lot to do with it. Found it: https://www.espn.com/nfl/story/_/id/46003861/nfl-teams-likely-decline-lose-more-games-2025-season-predictions-vikings-chiefs-commanders-lions-colts
×
×
  • Create New...