Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Price to move into top 3 based on past trades.


panther4life
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 hours ago, Reebis21 said:

Historically if u look back at true bottom 10 teams drafting a Qb between selections 2-10, it doesn’t usually end up working out. 
 

I think Matt Ryan, Rivers and McNabb are the exceptions until recently with Herbert.

Unless u take the Qb at #1 as a bottom 10 team or as a team who trades up into the top 10, it doesn’t really result in success.

Usually I’d be worried about us drafting a Qb being a “bottom 10 team” but given we only lost a game due to DJ’s helmet coming off and then not replacing a complete moron for a coach last offseason, I view this team as one who shouldn’t be bottom 10.

I think if our brass has a clear cut favorite at Qb, gotta risk it for the biscuit and make a move with the Bears.

Most QB selections don't work out.  Even top picks fail more often than not.  Its a crap shoot, but we probably have to take a shot.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Shocker said:

Big risk trading all those picks to go to #3 when that is probably for Levis.  Young and CJ are going top 2 folks

Don’t totally agree because the Smoke around Levi’s being seen as a Josh Allen isn’t fake… I can see team based on Levi’s potential being swayed to take him over both… Wilson went before Fields, Lance and Mac based off potential… Trubisky went before Mahomes and Watson based on potential… Potential is a powerful drug in the scouting world..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, WOW!! said:

Don’t totally agree because the Smoke around Levi’s being seen as a Josh Allen isn’t fake… I can see team based on Levi’s potential being swayed to take him over both… Wilson went before Fields, Lance and Mac based off potential… Trubisky went before Mahomes and Watson based on potential… Potential is a powerful drug in the scouting world..

Just saying it’s a risk and wishful thinking our guy is there at 3

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

If you believe in the prospect you are targeting make the move and shoot your shot. We can't keep being scared.

That’s my point now.. They have been preparing to make this move for the last 2 years.. Now just do what you have to to follow thur..

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

This is what I can’t get past. You trade up for stroud then maybe you draft nothing but O-line and receivers for the next 2-3 years for whatever you have left. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Donald LaFell said:

This is what I can’t get past. You trade up for stroud then maybe you draft nothing but O-line and receivers for the next 2-3 years for whatever you have left. 

I posted in jest but I actually think we're in a good spot to make an aggressive move if we think the right guy is available. We have good young talent at most of the premium positions outside of QB. Moore at WR, Moton and Icky at OT, Burns at EDGE rusher, Brown at DT, Horn at CB. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I posted in jest but I actually think we're in a good spot to make an aggressive remove if we think the right guy is available. We have good young talent at most of the premium positions outside of QB. Moore at WR, Moton and Icky at OT, Burns at EDGE rusher, Brown at DT, Horn at CB. 

Ppl also don’t understand that 2024 and 25 are big cap flexibility years for us.. We have a lot of Cap money after 23 and a QB on a rookie deal..

Excited Season 2 GIF by The Office

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Ultimately it's up to the other safety prospects to clearly outplay Scott. I think when that happens on tape against other teams it'll be addressed. I think none of them have done that definitively and consistently yet. 
    • Night and day difference in the front office investements.  Since Morgan has been in the FO (5 years)....4 out of 5 first round picks have been offensive players.  The one defensive pick was a corner. Expand it out to the first 2 rounds? 7 out of the 9 picks have been offensive.  That IMO is why our D sucks so bad.   You build defenses up front.   Carolina hasn't been investing there.  Ron's first 5 years? 3 of the 5 first round picks were defensive players.  Expand it all to include second rounders  7 of the 10 picks were defensive.  All front 7 players.     
    • I think he gets this year to show what he can do.  Last year, we had a lot of injuries. This year, we should have some players, even if we lose one or two.  It's the first preseason game.  Some of the starters weren't even in it.  There is no scheming or game planning.  Let's see how guys do when it counts. I think we have a GM that knows a thing or two about defense.  Let it play out.
×
×
  • Create New...