Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Bears have been approached by multiple teams for #1 Pick and are leaning towards trading the pick away per Adam Schefter

Varking

By Varking,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
6 minutes ago, Basbear said:

In the sense that the demands could not be reached. 

No chance ATL was trading the vick pick. Plus just like the others, vick checked all the boxes, his arm strength was legendary. About the one issue, he was a lefty with accuracy questions. 

College wise, hard as it is to make this work. For sure Id taken vick over manning. A tyreek hill that has a 155, gimmie that.....

Is my memory not working… didn’t Atlanta trade up to get Vick?

 

so wouldn’t your argument be that the chargers would never trade the number 1 pick? But yet they did…..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, TheCasillas said:

Is my memory not working… didn’t Atlanta trade up to get Vick?

 

so wouldn’t your argument be that the chargers would never trade the number 1 pick? But yet they did…..

Yes!! I don’t understand why ppl are trying to put Vick on this list because he was seen the same way Cam was.. 

? on accuracy 

? on football intelligence 

? on work ethic

? on if his style of play could work in the NFL..

Nooo Vick was not looked at like Elway, Lawrence or Luck..

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
23 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Is my memory not working… didn’t Atlanta trade up to get Vick?

 

so wouldn’t your argument be that the chargers would never trade the number 1 pick? But yet they did…..

Maybe my isnt, cause I dont recall that. I do remember SD had terrible ownership and rep, that many avoided ala eli deal as well. Was there any "I aint playin for SD?". Plus didnt SD have rivers or brees? I somewhat remember elway refusing to play for colts and sparking giant issues- trades, AFL, etc. I think the pick was traded for too, but more of a forced deal. 

They did get offense LT and brees(2nd round and bunch other picks), so didnt already have QB. hmmm. 

I still put Vick right there after the elway, luck, and law. I feel like people forgot how he was the living cheat code for some time. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
TheCasillas Grand Master

TheCasillas

Posted
Posted
2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

Maybe my isnt, cause I dont recall that. I do remember SD had terrible ownership and rep, that many avoided ala eli deal as well. Was there any "I aint playin for SD?". Plus didnt SD have rivers or brees? I somewhat remember elway refusing to play for colts and sparking giant issues- trades, AFL, etc. I think the pick was traded for too, but more of a forced deal. 

They did get offense LT and brees(2nd round and bunch other picks), so didnt already have QB. hmmm. 

I still put Vick right there after the elway, luck, and law. I feel like people forgot how he was the living cheat code for some time. 

Vick and Chargers couldn’t land on a rookie deal https://theathletic.com/2535152/2021/04/27/the-2001-nfl-draft-trade-that-changed-the-falcons-chargers-and-qb-play-forever/

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted (edited)
10 minutes ago, TheCasillas said:

Vick and Chargers couldn’t land on a rookie deal https://theathletic.com/2535152/2021/04/27/the-2001-nfl-draft-trade-that-changed-the-falcons-chargers-and-qb-play-forever/

Thats part of it, SD had a AWFUL rep and it goes to the money. I take that a slight * in regards to the trading of the pick. The way Archie handle SD behind the cameras, was OG gangsta style. That was soon after and the same method were being used.......SD was cheap and hated paying rookies top money(they had lots of hold-outs), they were partly right cause in 2011 it was changed. 

Edited by Basbear
Link to comment
Share on other sites
ForJimmy Grand Master

ForJimmy

Posted
Posted
3 minutes ago, Shocker said:

 No he doesn’t he can see that Young is a better player.  Cuz he has eyes

He thinks Young is the next Patrick Mahomes. If other GMs actually thought this the Bears phones would be blowing up. It’s easy to hype your guy up and say sensational things like “the next Mahomes” when your career isn’t on the line. The Bears aren’t risking it and rightfully so. Get more picks and address one of their other 1000 needs.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • strato
      The running back situation....

      By strato · Posted

      okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Captain Morgan
      OTA's

      By Captain Morgan · Posted

      Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • WUnderhill
      Myles Garrett Traded to Rams

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...