Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Per Matt Miller.. Panthers all in on Richardson?


micnificent28
 Share

Recommended Posts

Honestly, with all the flaws from each of the top 4 QB prospects, I'm fine with any of them.  The more and more I try to analyze the situation the more apparent the need for a heady bridge QB.  We need a QB who will show our draft pick how to be a pro, and make our QB earn the starting job.  I know it sounds cliché, but that's what we need.  Frank and mostly Josh can be the teachers the vet needs to set the example.  

Cam, through his adversity at Florida and JC learned how to put a team on his back and willed them to the national championship.  One aspect of Cam's game that I feel is often overlooked is his leadership abilitly.  He took over the personality of the team on both sides of the ball.  He was a grinder.  

If Richardson or Levis have that grinder mentality I'm all about either of them.  As critical as many were of Levis last year, he didn't gripe.  The dude is confident, just hope he isn't Zack Wilson like cocky.

Give me someone like Minshew or Heinicke who can serve as a solid #2 for years but will not back down to earn the job as our bridge QB.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, glenwo2 said:

HS?   High-School?

You can't mention what College he played for?   lol

Alright diphead

ARich has spent 3 years at Florida= 3years removed from HS when he went pro

Cam spent 2 years at Florida, 1 at Juco, 1 at Auburn= 4 years removed from HS

 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

If he has a great pro day this kid might be the 1st QB off the board. His hype is starting to get bigger by the day. So many positive reports about him coming out of the combine.

 

I was on the Stroud/Young train but this kid wouldn't be a bad fallback option "if" he's still available

If Richardson will be the first guy taken, I'll change my name to "bottom dawg. For a year.

Edited by top dawg
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

37 minutes ago, ncfan said:

Alright diphead

ARich has spent 3 years at Florida= 3years removed from HS when he went pro

Cam spent 2 years at Florida, 1 at Juco, 1 at Auburn= 4 years removed from HS

 

In those 3 years he's only started 13 games. He was also a redshirt sophomore coming into the draft.  He is raw as raw can get for an nfl prospect.  Think about that before you invest serious capital and put your employment on the line. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

In those 3 years he's only started 13 games. He was also a redshirt sophomore coming into the draft.  He is raw as raw can get for an nfl prospect.  Think about that before you invest serious capital and put your employment on the line. 

Cam only started 14 D1 games.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Cam only started 14 D1 games.

I do not consider that comparable. The results were not even close. Not saying switching the teams may have resulted in the same outcome but you cannot use hypothetical projections.  He is much future behind in his development and just because he resembles Cam Newton does not mean he will even sniff Cam 2.0 if that's the thinking. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

I do not consider that comparable. The results were not even close. Not saying switching the teams may have resulted in the same outcome but you cannot use hypothetical projections.  He is much future behind in his development and just because he resembles Cam Newton does not mean he will even sniff Cam 2.0 if that's the thinking. 

Oh, I definitely think Cam was significantly better in his 4th college season than Richardson was in his 3rd.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

love the potential, love the hype, love the fun plays.

we had that with Cam. I want to win a super bowl. That is all I care about. Give me the most boring QB in the world if that means a ring. I don't AR wins us a ring. It would make for some good memories and fun games, like with Cam. But no ring.

Give me Stroud or Levis.

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

30 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

In those 3 years he's only started 13 games. He was also a redshirt sophomore coming into the draft.  He is raw as raw can get for an nfl prospect.  Think about that before you invest serious capital and put your employment on the line. 

I'd be fine with taking him at #9 - the same goes for Stroud and Young. I wouldn't trade up for any of these QBs and I simply don't like Levis as a prospect.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
    • If everything played out and that last thing happened, I probably just quit. 
×
×
  • Create New...