Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Do we agree trading up to #3 with Cardinals is the best option for the team?


CamWhoaaCam
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Last year was a pretty widely panned QB class with many not even having a first round grade on a QB. Comparing that to this year in any way is just asinine.

But he was not comparing the QB classes--he was making a statement about the immediate player inflation that goes along with fans' ratings following the combine.  I see the point, and I agree that this year is very different.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

My opinion for our situation would be push to get to 1 this week and plan to take Stroud/Young. Having a rookie who is ready to play immediately in our plans like either of them helps immensely as free agency kicks off. Would allow us to sign a vet backup presence more so than an every week stater we’d want for an ARich, and that would allow us to push more money to other spots like TE, DL, Secondary that’ll help us win right away.

I personally think at the rate the rest of our division is going we’d host a playoff game year one with either of them which makes the trade easier to stomach.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Young or Syroud are the only 2 I care to move up for. I'm definitely trying to get to #1 to get my guy. If the price is just to steep, then I watch what happens at #1 and #2

It's possible a team like Indy or Seattle fall in love with AR and move to #1 to get him, Seattle has Geno who is the perfect bridge to allow AR to ait and learn. 

If that doesn't happen, it's possible that Houston falls on love with AR and grabs him up. What if Houston and their defensive minded HC Ryans wants Anderson or Carter to build his defense around? They might look QB at pick 12 or move up a few spots from 12. Could grab Ryans a defensive stud and a QB.

If we can't get to #1, and anything like this happens, you go to #3 and get Young or Stroud. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Trading to 1 and any variation of “safe” shouldn’t be in the same sentence. 

Well staying put at 9 is technically playing it safe as well which is what we have done all the way up till now and it hasn't got us anywhere. Stroud has all the tools of being a legit franchise QB, at Worst he is a solid QB in the league. Hard to look at him and say he is gonna be a bust, so thats why i say he is safe.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

It's risky as hell, but it's probably happening. At the same time, you just hired a staff that includes Reich, McCown, Caldwell, etc. 

If that room of coaches can't identify talent that they feel a conviction about, then we're more fuged than whatever the trade package ends up costing us. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, stan786 said:

My opinion for our situation would be push to get to 1 this week and plan to take Stroud/Young. Having a rookie who is ready to play immediately in our plans like either of them helps immensely as free agency kicks off. Would allow us to sign a vet backup presence more so than an every week stater we’d want for an ARich, and that would allow us to push more money to other spots like TE, DL, Secondary that’ll help us win right away.

I personally think at the rate the rest of our division is going we’d host a playoff game year one with either of them which makes the trade easier to stomach.

The state of our division certainly makes a bold move more appealing. The next team in this division to land a legit QB is setup to own the division for the foreseeable future.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

11 hours ago, top dawg said:

No need to trade up if you're not going to get your guy. Moving to one is the only way to guarantee you get who you want, and if it's who you want then one more first is worth it.

Yep. 

‘ no risk it, no biscuit’. B Arians 

cost is in the eye of the beholder in the nfl draft but one thing is certain these days, with the rules geared to offense, a good to great QB can hide a whole lot of holes

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • This is perspective and I think Canales’ dad was a shrink. His description of this lack of urgency which we see is ‘cold blooded’. Not excited just surgical.  Also, the 1 of 11 while a smart way to go, is also a pretty big smoke job probably intended to take pressure off of the QB., But which is it? I don’t think we were looking at cold blooded killer last year. Maybe he can kill something, but he is up against a lot. I am going to have to defend him somewhat on the leadership though because it was his first season and his play was not strong enough for him to start putting people on notice or any talk at all. And his voice... and he looks like a kid. It would probably hurt him more than help him in to be rah rah in that situation. Just grind. 
    • Yeah man I don't see the big deal. I played football we develop a brotherhood and I was coached to never quit on your teammates no matter how bad the situation is.   I think CMC is a good person. My issue was with him milking injuries because we were in a bad situation. I can never respect that as a competitor especially from my own teammate.   Some people may disagree that's fine.
    • I'm sure he's devastated that you don't like him and think he's soft. I do agree that I've responded to you way too much. 
×
×
  • Create New...