Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Panthers to aggressive pursue trade up to get a QB


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

Once again; Fields dropped to where he did and the entire class last year dropped further than any media led us onto believe. Obviously this class is different but it’s been proven that media vs front offices do share different perspectives. What good does it do for Reich and Fitt to come out say we really trade everything for Stroud or anyone?

You are still taking a chance and hoping a QB will fall and if the FO believes that the QB they want will not fall to them. Then they trade up. 
I would rather they be able to stay at 9 and get a QB but I have a feeling that the QBs are gonna go fast. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

With Fitt's comments about now maybe being the time to go up and get their guy because they don't plan on picking in the top 10 anymore, the chances of a trade are extremely high. The only question is how high do they go and when do they make the trade.

He made a comment about deciding which way they want to go (draft or FA) in the weeks following the combine and leading up to FA, to give them a clearer picture of what they do in FA (bridge or starting QB). This suggests they could try and get the trade done in the next couple of weeks.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Eric4280 said:

Once again; Fields dropped to where he did and the entire class last year dropped further than any media led us onto believe. Obviously this class is different but it’s been proven that media vs front offices do share different perspectives. What good does it do for Reich and Fitt to come out say we really trade everything for Stroud or anyone?

That was a 6 1st round QB draft and not as many QB hungry teams and a stronger crop of FA QB’s.. This isn’t the same thing or same situation.. 

Jmo.. You can’t trust that Seattle nor AtL won’t take QB’s (both in front of us).. The Raiders are confirmed opp’s (also in front of us) and now that Washington, Tampa or NO isn’t ready to trade everything to get infront of us.. Reality check Half the league has recognized they need a QB and this has become musical chairs.. Who ends of without a chair will be determined by aggression to get your guy..

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Eric4280 said:

Once again; Fields dropped to where he did and the entire class last year dropped further than any media led us onto believe. Obviously this class is different but it’s been proven that media vs front offices do share different perspectives. What good does it do for Reich and Fitt to come out say we really trade everything for Stroud or anyone?

And to be in reality.. 

Most of the media told you last years QB class wasn’t good and most if not all had the QB’s last year graded as 2nd and 3rd round talent at best.. 
 

YOU chose not to read between the lines and recognize the true feelings on last years QB class…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

what GIF

Sure would have been nice to have traded Burns for those two firsts and second round picks now.

shocked gasp GIF by VH1

How does those worst division wins feel now? Should have tanked.

Season 2 What GIF by Friends

Just wait until next year. It's a better QB class.

Xena Warrior Princess What GIF by HULU

Just take BPA at 9 and save the future picks.

Gasp Wow GIF

Did I miss anything?

 

Anticipation Popcorn GIF

Some of those things are true though?  If Burns was traded we would have plenty of ammo to move up and it not hurt nearly as much.  If we hadnt won pointless games we wouldnt have to try to to begin with.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jtm said:

Yes they are a sure thing. Whether they are worth the contract is the debate. 

Sure of what??? Again..

1 of them makes you sure that you won’t be competing for Super Bowls and the other could retire and become a Game show host or Indiana Jones half way thru the season…

Neither of the top FA QB’s this year is a “sure thing” jmo..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If these QBs are as good as advertised.  It won’t matter.  Half the people would do anything to have one of the top 5 QBs in the NFL.  To have their “Josh Allen or Joe Burrow” here.

I believe these QBs are as good as advertised.  

We got coaches comparing Players certain Player to Joe Burrow

 

We got national guys like Daniel Jeremiah saying Stroud had one of the best throwing sessions he’s seen at the combine 


 

and for the “they get hype every year crowd”

Hardly anyone had Willis Top 30 prior to the Pro days.  Heck Daniel Jeremiah who is one of the more glued in guys.  The only QB he had too 25 was Pickett at 24.  He had his first big board come out Last Month.  And 4 QBs were in his top 13 overall prospects.

I know @Vergewho if you have been around here long enough , know that she’s good stuff and has her connection’s.  She has 3 QBs in this class graded higher than she had Fields coming out.  There are several other national guys who have echoed this.

 

additonal to add to these guys.

pretty cool thing linking the cognitive scores to success in the NFL 

 


Purdy had the highest score in that category among the guys in his class and even higher than Trey Lance.

Mahomes, Allen, Bree’s, and the top guys also had top scores in this.  
The QBs in this draft class are among the highest they’ve graded.


 

we need to trade up and get one of these guys. We’ve spent the last 4 years “building the roster” which is about 2 years longer than the avg NFL team before getting a QB.  We’ve spent high draft capital and hit on those picks at the biggest foundation pieces in this sport outside the QB.  It’s how we dam near won the division with Sam Darnold and PJ Walker at QB.  Even after the division got a head start on us until we fired that Moron of a HC.

We kicked ourselves for not trading up for a QB the other year from a school that traditionally fails at producing good QBs, a guy who didn’t win a Heisman, nor win a championship.   But we kicked ourselves a year later for missing on him despite when the draft was here.  No one wanted him.  And espy to trade up for him.

 

it’s time to trade up now.  If not we could really be setting ourselves up for some pain where you capped your ceiling.  Drafting the 20’s.  Not good enough to get over the top because a mid to bad QB.  And to far back to go get your QB.

3A4507BE-203F-4A77-9868-AD8ABAA8502B.jpeg

3D2017F7-DF1E-41FA-8737-9933592279CA.jpeg

Edited by ncfan
Link to comment
Share on other sites

29 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

If guys like daniel jones and sam darnold get 4 and 5 years to show their talent then I am perfectly on board with giving someone like Stroud 3 years to get his poo together.  3 firsts doesnt cripple you like you think

Missing out on 3 cornerstone pieces isn't crippling?  Wow! If the QB pans out, it still hurts, just much, much less.  If dude flops, then yes, fugged doesn't even begin to describe the situation.

The problem with the 'move up' crowd is they are so desperate for a QB, while many say they "understand" the consequences of said QB busting, honestly, they really don't.

Edited by 45catfan
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Exactly what I was going to say. Brady seems to be taking a page out of Olsen's playbook, which is probably a good thing. They'll probably get around to giving Brady an Emmy one day, and he should thank Olsen for giving him the blueprint for success.
    • In before: "XL sucks, there is no hope." "As long as we have Bryce, none of this matters." My response: "It's X, not XL...we're not discussing apparel sizes, or we'd have to consider XS."  
    • Alain Pierre provides some food for thought on Last Word On Sports regarding Xavier Legette, and his article, though specifically on X, kind of puts me in the mind of QBs being overdrafted and put into situations that they're not prepared for, some ultimately failing due to drafting missteps by front offices who don't necessarily view prospective players within the contextual importance that situations demand.  At this point, Legette looks like a failure in reference to expectations, of not only what a consistently productive NFL receiver looks like, but a first round pick (which he obviously should never have been). But the story on X isn't necessarily completely over. Damn. I seem to be experiencing deja vu...It wasn't X's fault that he was overdrafted, that was a choice by an FO that obviously downplayed actual realized skill vs outstanding measurables and upside. Sure, the FO was impressed by X's one-year feats during his senior season at South Carolina, but it was the NFL god, RAS (a.k.a. Raw Athletic Score), that had Dave Canales's and Dan Morgan's jaws dropping in amazement at the sight of X running around in underwear at the Combine...   "At 6-foot-3 and over 220 pounds, Legette brought rare athletic upside to the position. His breakout season at South Carolina showed flashes of dominance that NFL teams dream of. Projecting forward, many scouts compared his physical profile to D.K. Metcalf, and the Panthers clearly believed they could develop him into a true wide receiver 1 over time. The issue was never his talent. The issue was the timeline. Just a few picks later, the Chargers selected Ladd McConkey, a receiver who may have lacked Xavier Legette’s physical ceiling but entered the league far more technically refined. McConkey immediately showed advanced route discipline, leverage awareness, good pacing, and separation ability.  Bryce Young’s game has always depended on timing and anticipation. His best football at Alabama came with receivers capable of winning through precision rather than pure athleticism. Jameson Williams and John Metchie III were excellent route runners and were able to get drafted in 2022. McConkey naturally fit that style of play. Legette, meanwhile, needed significant development in the exact areas where Bryce Young needed help. The Panthers drafted traits when Bryce Young needed reliability."   Yes, the FO was guilty. The good thing is that the execs appear to be improving. Some of that may be attributed to the hiring of Eric Eager (who was hired right after the Xavier Legette draft). Eager seems to have helped the Panthers FO fine-tune their analytical progress, and, at least on paper, they acquired players with a lot of value during the last draft in regards to actually (what I'll refer to as) "underdrafting" talent relative to their position with value already built in.  Look at Chris Brazzell: He may be more of the quintessential project receiver who was arguably more or less just as raw as Legette was when he was drafted, and with a relatively high RAS as well. The notable difference is value, as Brazzell was a round three pick and Legette was a first rounder.    "Unlike the Xavier Legette situation, Carolina’s environment for Brazzell is completely different. "The Panthers are not asking a raw receiver prospect to stabilize this offense for Bryce Young. "Brazzell enters a much healthier developmental situation with far less pressure. With Tetairoa McMillan established as the primary target and Jalen Coker continuing to settle as the number 2 option...Xavier Legette, Metchie III, and Jimmy Horn Jr. are also still in this rotation, fighting for reps. "It gives Carolina something they failed to give Legette when they drafted him: A developmental runway. "Xavier Legette entered the league with expectations attached to a first-round pick and an offense desperate for answers. Brazzell enters a room where he can spend a year working on his route running, learning the playbook, and earning snaps gradually rather than being asked to become part of Bryce Young’s solution immediately. "And truthfully, Brazzell needs that time coming out of college. Despite his elite physical tools, many evaluators have several concerns about his overall polish as a receiver. "His route tree at Tennessee was viewed as fairly limited due to the type of offense that they run. The receivers are expected to run a lot of choice routes, which are dictated by the placement of the defenders. It doesn’t require technical route-running and an understanding of the playbook needed at the NFL level...   "Context changes significantly when expectations change. "The Panthers are not depending on Brazzell to save the offense. They can allow him to develop slowly, expand his route tree, improve his technical refinement, and learn behind a much more stable receiver room... "Traits become much easier to bet on when patience is built into the plan."   It's all about understanding your situation. I don't agree that it's an inherently difficult choice like the author is suggesting in the following excerpt. At the very least, I think that it should be easier as long as all parties involved stay levelheaded and true to their process.    "That is what makes these draft decisions so difficult. "Every front office believes it can find the next Metcalf, Owens, or Marshall. Sometimes they do. More often, they are betting on a development path that may take years to complete. "The challenge is understanding what your offense needs right now. "If a team has patience, stability, and a quarterback capable of carrying the offense while a receiver develops, betting on traits can make sense. But if a young quarterback needs immediate help, there is a strong argument for prioritizing the receiver who already knows how to separate, create throwing , and earn trust from day one. "That’s why the Xavier Legette-Ladd McConkey debate remains so fascinating. "It was never really a discussion about talent. It was a discussion about timing."   For me, Ladd McConkey was talented enough in his own right, that the gap--the upside--was never as big as people are suggesting between not only McConkey and Legette, but McConkey and other receivers drafted in the first round during that draft. The technique divide between Ladd and X was pretty stark though, as was the roughly 35 pounds, but the speed was identical, the maybe 1½ height difference isn't huge (6' and 6'1"), and it may surprise some that Ladd's RAS (9.34) was also enough to put him in the top 10 percent of receivers since 1987. There is an argument that he would've been a better pick for Bryce and the Panthers, regardless of timeline and talent. But, I still appreciate the thesis (if you will) of the article, as it still provides some hope--perhaps a glimmer at this point, that X's RAS may finally translate to the NFL given more time, but, perhaps more importantly, it explains how Dan Morgan and company are showing improvement, even if it appears somewhat understated. My hope is that continued improvement is palpable by this time next year. https://lastwordonsports.com/nfl/2026/05/30/xavier-legette-draft-lessons/#google_vignette        
×
×
  • Create New...