Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Kunkel says we're only "seriously interested" in three


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, jayboogieman said:

If they want someone that can start day 1, that only leaves 1, maybe 2 QBs(Young and maybe Stroud). Levis is not ready to start.

If Levis isn’t ready to start after playing in pro style systems and being 24 when the season starts then we shouldn’t draft him. All 3 should start day 1. AR is the only one of the top projected 4 if we drafted that should sit half a season or more.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, PantherFanInPhilly said:

No matter who reports it…I am not sure why the Panthers not being interested in a rookie qb that’s nowhere close to being NFL ready is that hard to believe. 

I remember a lot of fans talking about how great Gil Brandt was when he spoke positively of Cam Newton prior to the draft.

Later on, when Brandt pointed up some issues in a then veteran Newton's game, some of those same fans came back and called him an old codger.

It's a time-honored Huddle tradition that a reporter's reliability depends mostly on whether or not you agree with their opinion. So if you think the Panthers should draft Anthony Richardson, Kunkel's likely a hack right now 😕

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Doesn't matter what we do, there will be a sizeable faction of the Huddle who thinks we've paved the way to a dynasty and a roughly equally sizeable faction who thinks we've doomed ourselves to a decade of bottom feeding. 

I totally trust the coaching staff... Until they make a decision that I disagree with 😕

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I remember a lot of fans talking about how great Gil Brandt was when he spoke positively of Cam Newton prior to the draft.

Later on, when Brandt pointed up some issues in a then veteran Newton's game, some of those same fans came back and called him an old codger.

It's a time-honored Huddle tradition that a reporter's reliability depends mostly on whether or not you agree with their opinion. So if you think the Panthers should draft Anthony Richardson, Kunkel's likely a hack right now 😕

Gil Brandt and Will Kunkel, truly on the same plain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, TheRumGone said:

If Levis isn’t ready to start after playing in pro style systems and being 24 when the season starts then we shouldn’t draft him. All 3 should start day 1. AR is the only one of the top projected 4 if we drafted that should sit half a season or more.

From what I saw of Levis this past season, he needs more time in the oven.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

Oh yeah, that's absolutely what I meant by that analogy 🙄

Okay, what did you mean? People here are giving Kunkel poo for being a nobody that seems to make less than accurate predictions. How is Gil Bradnt, someone's who career in the NFL that spanned decades, analogous to him?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jayboogieman said:

From what I saw of Levis this past season, he needs more time in the oven.

I just don't think what's between his ears can be fixed. It's similar to Sam Darnold. He'll need an almost perfect team around him to make it in this league from what I've watched. I could be wrong, but it's just my opinion from what I've seen.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • And that makes you right. 
    • Mel Kiper said he would retire if Jimmy Clausen wasn't a successful NFL starter too. Just because the experts make a claim doesnt mean it's true either.  Bryce may be a serviceable QB for someone. Serviceable QBs don't bring you a perennial winner or lead you to the playoffs over and over. Serviceable QBs also dont get 50m plus per year deals which is what a Bryce extension would look like.  The stats show he hasn't been even a serviceable QB in the 3 years he's been here. The eye test shows he hasn't put together 2 franchise QB salary games back to back in 3 years.  Complain all you want about people being negative, but people pointing out that Bryce is held to a different standard than anyone else on the team isn't complaining. It's stating the obvious. 
    • We have big bodied WRs and 3 TEs who all have potential and each bring something different to the table. I never saw the need to go out there and try and find a new starting TE.  While it's nice to have a guy like McBride, Bowers, etc, I think a team's better use of the cap is by having TEs on rookie contracts or cheap vets, not having to pay elite TE money.
×
×
  • Create New...