Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Will Kunkel says we're only "seriously interested" in three


top dawg
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, Martin said:

It feels like Kunkel is often speculating or thinking out loud on what he would do and then pass it on as information he’s learned from sources. So it is hard to trust him imo. But I’m sure he gets it right at times.

It’s exactly what it is.  He legit went on a podcast just yesterday saying he thinks the Panthers like Young and Levis as the top 2 QBs due to fit then a gap and then Stroud as QB3.  Noting while Stroud throws nice passes. “He’s always just throwing to open WRs”

as of there isn’t video evidence out there from our very own QB Coach essentially contradicting Kunkles evaluation.  

But then again.  Kunkle did say like 3 weeks ago that Stroud was the only QB worth trading for this draft. Soooo

 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Krovvy said:

🤣

This guy is looking to hit on predictions to up his sorry ass Twitter following. Any hits he has will be remembered, while stuff like this will be forgotten. 

It seems most of sport twatter is aiming at growing their "rep/follow/whateverdafug" with super edgy bizarre cucklicky bait BS.... fug do I hate this timeline.....

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

It seems most of sport twatter is aiming at growing their "rep/follow/whateverdafug" with super edgy bizarre cucklicky bait BS.... fug do I hate this timeline.....

It's not just Twitter. That's what sports talk in general has become.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

A lot of guys do.

Some are better at making it clear which parts are their own opinion vs what they're hearing than others.

Being able to distinguish those things goes a long way toward understanding what's being reported.

I agree, it just bugs me that some reporters are not more upfront about it. It is an issue with the clickbait era unfortunately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, MHS831 said:

If there are three, then move up with Arizona asap.

Agreed, If we have 3 names go to #3 and rejoice.  However...if Chicago stays in the top 4 picks and Las Vegas does not move up then the Panthers only need to go to 5 for their 3rd guy.  Just saying

Edited by Shocker
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

It's not just Twitter. That's what sports talk in general has become.

Thank you for going there and finding panther content!

 

Skip changed the sports talk world for the worse reason, boy do I miss 90s espn......also miss espn news. Hate that "debate" and "divide" and "pick a side" that sports talk became, thanks skip you fuging monster....

 

Finally Im old enough to member when you didnt even post twatter stuff, you jumped in head first....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Basbear said:

Thank you for going there and finding panther content!

Skip changed the sports talk world for the worse reason, boy do I miss 90s espn......also miss espn news. Hate that "debate" and "divide" and "pick a side" that sports talk became, thanks skip you fuging monster....

Finally Im old enough to member when you didnt even post twatter stuff, you jumped in head first....

I could give you plenty of my own opinion but I don't have any inside sources 😆

Twitter's become one of the better ways to get information, even if it's sometimes inextricably mixed with opinion.

One of the policies I have with it these days is that not everything I post is necessarily something I agree with. It's just something that I tend to feel is worth discussing.

I've said many times that Jason LaCanfora for example is very hit or miss, but if you ignore something he posts and it turns out to be a hit, then you're the one that missed 😃

Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, Martin said:

I think Joe does a good job saying “…my sense is…”. It is very clear it is his opinion. Joe is doing a great job at the Athletic.

He did improve lots after he leftd the observer, sad part is he maybe the best non-panther owned reporter now. He still asks such shitty questions, my god joe.....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Mr. Scot said:

I could give you plenty of my own opinion but I don't have any inside sources 😆

Twitter's become one of the better ways to get information, even if it's sometimes inextricably mixed with opinion.

One of the policies I have with it these days is that not everything I post is necessarily something I agree with. It's just something that I tend to feel is worth discussing.

I've said many times that Jason LaCanfora for example is very hit or miss, but if you ignore something he posts and it turns out to be a hit, then you're the one that missed 😃

thats fair.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Basbear said:

He did improve lots after he leftd the observer, sad part is he maybe the best non-panther owned reporter now. He still asks such shitty questions, my god joe.....

He's not as cringe as David Newton when it comes to questions though. You'd have to go a pretty long way to get to that point.

We've had some pretty good ones pass through on their way elsewhere. Jourdan Rodrigue, Alaina Getzenberg and Jonathan Alexander for example.

Kinda hoping The Observer manages to hang on to its current team of Ellis Williams and Mike Kaye. They're both top notch.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ncfan said:

It’s exactly what it is.  He legit went on a podcast just yesterday saying he thinks the Panthers like Young and Levis as the top 2 QBs due to fit then a gap and then Stroud as QB3.  Noting while Stroud throws nice passes. “He’s always just throwing to open WRs”

as of there isn’t video evidence out there from our very own QB Coach essentially contradicting Kunkles evaluation.  

But then again.  Kunkle did say like 3 weeks ago that Stroud was the only QB worth trading for this draft. Soooo

 

I love the "always throwing to open WRs" as a negative.  So umm is he not suppose to throw it to the open WR?  

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...