Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Lombardi: Panthers trying to trade Corral. Can be had for a "ham sandwich"


SuperBowlBound
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

I mean most teams don’t have 3 QBs on the roster. Eason won’t get snatched off our practice squad if we need an emergency one. 

I thought sorta like PJ walker did this year, Corral would force his way on team. Plus depending on the vet(like buttercup jimmyG) injury history, 3 may be the way. Panthers have room, this team isnt that close to a philly/49er roster. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Basbear said:

I thought sorta like PJ walker did this year, Corral would force his way on team. Plus depending on the vet(like buttercup jimmyG) injury history, 3 may be the way. Panthers have room, this team isnt that close to a philly/49er roster. 

Brissett, rookie, and Eason on the practice squad.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Toomers said:

Still doesn’t make sense to me. They aren’t going to find a QB3 cheaper with Corrals “upside”. He was never the answer to a starter, but he’s a better option than any QB3 they can get. 

The collective QB brain, must not be fans......who knows I still think lombardi is plugged in, but dont know for sure. 

I agree with you, cheap, young and "upside"......"NO THANKS" current staff???? I get that he may be rougher than than they like, but not to the point of releasing him or giving away for a 2027 7th. With the 3-4 and different O system, he could find himself in the rare player for player deal. Some 3rd team DE....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I’ve seen Brissett thrown around a few times. At first I wasn’t fond of that idea, but I had forgotten that he’s played under Reich before. I am warming up to starting the season off with him and handing off to Richardson or Levis after some games. I don’t think we should sign him if our staff plans to go with Stroud or Young. Those guys should be out there game one. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SuperBowlBound said:

I'm certainly in the camp that Rhule had most of the say but I'm not absolving Fitterer of anything. Frankly, the drafts have stunk. That's on everybody in the offices on Mint St.

Until Panthers draft performance improves, fans should remain justifiably skeptical of Scott Fitterer's performance as GM.

  • Pie 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SuperBowlBound said:

the drafts have stunk.

Not calling you out specifically on this, but if our drafts have stunk, what does a good draft look like?

Needless to say, Overall I do not feel this way, at all. I'm genuinely curious what most folks expect from a draft class?

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sounds like a guy just talking some poo/trying to be funny. 
 

If we trade him this fast, whether you like him or not, that’s an asinine waste of resources.
 

I think I’m just gonna ignore any public talk involving “panthers” and “qb”. It just seems like that’s the only talking point for the team, and every Tom, Dick, and Harry throws poo against the wall right now. 

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • No, the casual fan gets sucked into THIS^^^ kind of thinking, and it's so woefully incorrect that it's almost sad. The first is what I've said numerous times, NOTHING about non guaranteed contracts save the billionaire owners a single penny, because they still have to spend their cap floor, and the only reason teams ever don't spend the full limit, is to then roll it over into the next season to be able to spend more that year. But in the end, owners pay the same amount of money no matter what. The reverse is also the same, that the players in totality make the same amount of money as well, because in your example of Clowney not getting that money this year, it will go to another player, as the cap needs to be spent. And you say how we just cut Clowney after we gave him the 2 year contract, but everyone including Clowney's agent and himself, knew when it was signed, that it was more likely to be a 1 year contract than a 2 with how it was structured.  The 2nd year was just to be able to spread out the cap hit and he was always most likely going to end up getting traded or cut. It's why agents and players don't care about the total money in a contract, it's always and only been about the guaranteed money, as the years and overall value are meaningless, always have been, always will be.
    • Agents will have their 1st round picks hold out until the pay structure of their contract is to their liking, not how much money they'll get or even how much is guaranteed, just the when/how they will get the money over the course of the contract. If they're willing to recommend those players hold our, do you really think they won't do it for 2nd rounders to guarantee them an extra 10% of their entire rookie contract?
    • If BY continues to develop.  XL learns how to catch with his speed. Tet lives up to his hype... THEN Brooks comes back.. dammmmmmmmmmmmmm
×
×
  • Create New...