Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Stroud vs Michigan Tape (QB School)


Samppson
 Share

Recommended Posts

Even in his “worst” game he was great, just that flip int was even partially his fault. Otherwise even if Young might be better at those scrambling schoolyard plays, he also can’t make those ridiculous throws you see Stroud make routinely. His throwing ability is just insane. 

  • Beer 5
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, JawnyBlaze said:

Even in his “worst” game he was great, just that flip int was even partially his fault. Otherwise even if Young might be better at those scrambling schoolyard plays, he also can’t make those ridiculous throws you see Stroud make routinely. His throwing ability is just insane. 

Agreed, I like Young a lot, but I think Stroud's throwing ability is on another level. I sort of like how he didnt run a ton in college but clearly can do it as needed, that shows to me another level he can reach in the league.

  • Pie 5
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Samppson said:

Agreed, I like Young a lot, but I think Stroud's throwing ability is on another level. I sort of like how he didnt run a ton in college but clearly can do it as needed, that shows to me another level he can reach in the league.

You're hoping.

JT even says he doesn't see Stroud demonstrating the playmaking ability you look for. He's shown he can do it, but it doesn't come naturally to him like it does Young.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, OldhamA said:

You're hoping.

JT even says he doesn't see Stroud demonstrating the playmaking ability you look for. He's shown he can do it, but it doesn't come naturally to him like it does Young.

There's some projection there for sure, but if he's that good of a thrower of the ball, I don't him to scramble around like Justin Fields and rush for 100 yards a game, the passing game looks effortless to him.

I think my biggest question mark with him is he seems laidback, which can be good, sort of worries me if he has that fire and drive. But the same stuff was said about Herbert coming out, so it might just be his personality. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 Stroud is accurate no doubt. And has a touch I wished Cam had tried to develop because it ain’t always about the fastball. 

However Stroud doesn’t seem to have top velocity but maybe that is just me not recognizing it on streaming video. You sometimes have to have that fastball. I’d love to have a passing artist to watch. Touch, accuracy, velocity/arm strength if you need it. 

Are there measurements for his ball speed? Those NFL corners, fast.  

  • Pie 2
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

 Stroud is accurate no doubt. And has a touch I wished Cam had tried to develop because it ain’t always about the fastball. 

However Stroud doesn’t seem to have top velocity but maybe that is just me not recognizing it on streaming video. You sometimes have to have that fastball. I’d love to have a passing artist to watch. Touch, accuracy, velocity/arm strength if you need it. 

Are there measurements for his ball speed? Those NFL corners, fast.  

It's you

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

 Stroud is accurate no doubt. And has a touch I wished Cam had tried to develop because it ain’t always about the fastball. 

However Stroud doesn’t seem to have top velocity but maybe that is just me not recognizing it on streaming video. You sometimes have to have that fastball. I’d love to have a passing artist to watch. Touch, accuracy, velocity/arm strength if you need it. 

Are there measurements for his ball speed? Those NFL corners, fast.  

Yes, anything in the mid to upper 50's/low 60s is above average to elite. Not that this is a very important stat teams look at, but to specifically answer your question. 

 

https://www.nfl.com/videos/c-j-stroud-anthony-richardson-dtr-show-off-velocity-with-throws-ranging-from-59-

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Samppson said:

There's some projection there for sure, but if he's that good of a thrower of the ball, I don't him to scramble around like Justin Fields and rush for 100 yards a game, the passing game looks effortless to him.

I think my biggest question mark with him is he seems laidback, which can be good, sort of worries me if he has that fire and drive. But the same stuff was said about Herbert coming out, so it might just be his personality. 

I’ve seen him compared to Herbert with the style of play as well. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

 Stroud is accurate no doubt. And has a touch I wished Cam had tried to develop because it ain’t always about the fastball. 

However Stroud doesn’t seem to have top velocity but maybe that is just me not recognizing it on streaming video. You sometimes have to have that fastball. I’d love to have a passing artist to watch. Touch, accuracy, velocity/arm strength if you need it. 

Are there measurements for his ball speed? Those NFL corners, fast.  

Yeah I think Stroud has a good enough arm. And that isn’t an insult. Sure it isn’t a Favre arm, but Strouds arm is such that you don’t have to worry about arm strength limiting things. 

 

Once you have enough arm strength, I look more for touch and ball location. He has that too. 
 

I only have two concerns, which can only be answered in the pros. 
 

1. He absolutely won’t have the same clean pocket consistently in the NFL. (One thing I loved with Corral was the way he would handle free rushers with his mobility)
 

2. He won’t have a surrounding talent advantage every game.

 

That’s basically the “he went to Ohio St.” argument, but not how it’s normally used. 
 

But being an Ohio St. quarterback doesn’t mean he will suck, it just means that it’s easier for guys who aren’t NFL caliber to look better than they are. 
 

 

…I think Strouds ball placement makes him the exception to other OSU quarterbacks though, and I think he has a lot of potential. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

45 minutes ago, stratocatter said:

 Stroud is accurate no doubt. And has a touch I wished Cam had tried to develop because it ain’t always about the fastball. 

However Stroud doesn’t seem to have top velocity but maybe that is just me not recognizing it on streaming video. You sometimes have to have that fastball. I’d love to have a passing artist to watch. Touch, accuracy, velocity/arm strength if you need it. 

Are there measurements for his ball speed? Those NFL corners, fast.  

 

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Wundrbread33 said:

Yeah I think Stroud has a good enough arm. And that isn’t an insult. Sure it isn’t a Favre arm, but Strouds arm is such that you don’t have to worry about arm strength limiting things. 

 

Once you have enough arm strength, I look more for touch and ball location. He has that too. 
 

I only have two concerns, which can only be answered in the pros. 
 

1. He absolutely won’t have the same clean pocket consistently in the NFL. (One thing I loved with Corral was the way he would handle free rushers with his mobility)
 

2. He won’t have a surrounding talent advantage every game.

 

That’s basically the “he went to Ohio St.” argument, but not how it’s normally used. 
 

But being an Ohio St. quarterback doesn’t mean he will suck, it just means that it’s easier for guys who aren’t NFL caliber to look better than they are. 
 

 

…I think Strouds ball placement makes him the exception to other OSU quarterbacks though, and I think he has a lot of potential. 

Yeah, Id agree there, I think I would be more worried about the surrounding talent, and throwing to good receivers who are open if he wasnt placing the ball so well. Even if those guys are covered, the ball would still be where it needs to be.

I think the GA game showed alot in terms of handling a pass rush, that D-Line is filled with future NFL caliber players. I really feel like theres alot of similarities between both Stroud and Herbert's last college game, they showed off that they can move good enough, not Justin Fields/Murray speed, but good enough.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I guess so. Don't think I was involved with previous discussions.  Tepper is one of the newest owners in the NFL. Dan is going into his 3rd season as a GM - ever. Dave is going into his 3rd season as a HC - ever. Before becoming a HC, he was an OC/playcaller for one season total. Idzik is about to go into his 1st year as a play caller - ever. WRs are rookies, sophomores and 3rd year guys - though the experienced 3rd year guys are XL and Coker (who has missed a ton of games). TEs are guys going into their 2nd and 3rd seasons, and Tommy Tremble - though Sanders has missed a ton of games. QB has played 3 years. Chuba is an experienced RB, but Brooks and Etienne have taken very little snaps at the position. O-line is more experienced vets with some talent - which is HUGE. Need them to stay healthy. I mean the offense is very young in every aspect except O-line. You see it differently?
    • I said this ALL last season and will say it again this year. Our record means diddly squat this year, I don't care if we have 0 wins or 17 wins, I only care about one thing and one thing only. Bryce proves without a shadow of a doubt that he IS or ISN'T our long term solution at QB. It's the only thing that matters for the same reason it sucks that this is the same thing as last year.  This needs to be determined, and if they can't determine it, then it's still telling the team the answer, just not the one they want to hear. As right now we're in the ultimate QB purgatory, a position that dooms franchises for years.  Just look at a team like the Cardinals, who extended a better QB and it still screwed them over and haven't had a contending team in a long time. People get too caught up on wins and losses when evaluating players, particularly QBs.  When people look at the final record and use that as a reason to want to extend a QB or not is just a fools errand.  If we had lost 2-3 more games last year because we didn't make a last second FG, I genuinely wonder if we would have just moved on from Bryce this offseason (like we should have been doing anyways IMHO).
×
×
  • Create New...