Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Panthers cut C Pat Elfein

Saca312

By Saca312,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

grimesgoat Experienced

grimesgoat

Posted
Posted
12 minutes ago, Basbear said:

We will not know until the draft happen, but I think youre still off. the top 51 is right next to draft one. 

most times those around 47-55 all have the same UDFA level pay. most times its doesnt effect the top 51 much. But add the #1 guaranteed draft pick will. Finessererer could trade around a few times too, i dont know if they keep the 39th or others. late 5th -7th are normally at the 51 cut off. 

Cap only counts the top 51.  Right now we are sitting on 51 guys.  If we add 6 guys salary, we'll lose 6 guys salary.  The math is pretty simple.

It's always had an effect around 5-7m.  Its a little higher this year with the first pick.

Regardless, no need to spend up to the limit.  Its nice to have some reserves for injuries and carry-over.  We'll need it next year for burns, luvu, chinn, etc.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
1 minute ago, grimesgoat said:

Cap only counts the top 51.  Right now we are sitting on 51 guys.  If we add 6 guys salary, we'll lose 6 guys salary.  The math is pretty simple.

It's always had an effect around 5-7m.  Its a little higher this year with the first pick.

Regardless, no need to spend up to the limit.  Its nice to have some reserves for injuries and carry-over.  We'll need it next year for burns, luvu, chinn, etc.

Those 5-7 dont replace anyone, feels like this will be hard to explain to either of us. Those 5-7 dont displace anyone cause that large group in the 43-55 range all make the similar money. Moving a guy form number 43 @ 800k to 49 *still at 800k, has barely no effect. 

I summon @Toomers to help!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
bandu Mentor

bandu

Posted
Posted
38 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

I'm not gonna celebrate just yet. We still have to nail this pick and find some guys for this kid to throw to.

yeah I don't understand why people are celebrating so much and for what reason it really makes no sense whatsoever

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, PanthersGTI said:

I thought he played pretty well at center, but he has no versatility, ass as a guard ( which is weird to me ). I'd imagine they are looking at Mayes and possibly a FA/draft pick to be backup center and guard. 

Why is it weird? He was too small / weak to play as a G. As a C that double teamed the DT though I thought he was good.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
mc52beast Grand Master

mc52beast

Posted
Posted
3 hours ago, t96 said:

Makes sense after we kept Boze but the hate he got here was ridiculous, he was a rock solid C for us. Bad at guard but good at C. Couldn't keep him as a backup at that cap hit but he wasn't bad for us at his natural position. Wish him the best for an AFC team that we don't play.

I think most of the hate was because we had Boz sitting on the bench who everyone except Rhule knew was a better option.

Link to comment
Share on other sites
Basbear Grand Master

Basbear

Posted
Posted
10 minutes ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Cut with a failed physical designation he might be done  

He had big hip problems, I hated the OG signing of him mainly cause of his injury history......I large man with hip problems can not lift right and thus becomes weak.....which that what he played like....

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • tukafan21
      Top Available FAs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      Yes, but those guys aren't depth guard signings, they're likely going to wait and see who has injuries or players under performing and then sign there. I also think that if Ickey really is going to be able to play at some point this year, that's where our guard depth comes from.  As if he gets to the point of being active, we'd then have 3 LT's on the roster with him, Freeling, and Walker, gotta think one of them not named Freeling gets kicked inside if needed.
    • WUnderhill
      Canes vs Vegas Gm 5 SCF 8PM

      By WUnderhill · Posted

      lol imagine being Hill and this is what your coach thinks about you replacing a guy giving up over 4 goals per game.
    • tukafan21
      Top Available FAs

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think Tyreek is a bad player to play with on the field, for sure not in the same way that Diggs is, as he's a cancer on the field with how he acts, and wouldn't take kindly to being 2nd fiddle behind T-Mac. It's that Tyreek is just a terrible person who realistically shouldn't even be in the NFL, his insane athletic ability is why his off field transgressions have been overlooked.  If he was a WR3, no team would have kept him around, it was only that he was a 1st ballot HOF level talent that kept him around. Just zero interest in having a person like that around our young WRs, that's really all it comes down to for me with him. Again, if we were true contenders this year, that changes things and I'd rather bring in the best possible players and hope it works out.  But they're trying to build something here and to do that, you need high quality people, not just great talent.
×
×
  • Create New...