Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Tepper redeems the franchise..


Jmac
 Share

Recommended Posts

Yeah, got to pump the breaks on us suddenly being well run. 

Tepper finally admitted to a mistake that there was no escaping from it being one.    And he pointlessly wasted 2023 because he still couldn’t admit it.  Water was clearly wet after 2022.  

It’s good he took a 180 approach on the new staff but Tepper is still Tepper.   

throwing cash at coaching names post Rhule doesn’t mean our front office suddenly becomes top end.   As of right now, we traded away CMC, DJ Moore and gave up a bunch to pick a QB….despite living in the top 10 in the Tepper era. 

Nothing about Tepper says he is hands off or a sound leader of a NFL franchise yet.  Maybe he will grow into one.  That’s certainly the hope.  Maybe he will just continue to appear to be the primary problem.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

anyone that has thrown Shade at Tepper at any point is crazy. it was clear after year 1 Rhule was the shits. Tepper is aggressive and that is what you want in an owner. his best trait though is he is not afraid to admit something didnt work any move away from it. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ericr0319 said:

anyone that has thrown Shade at Tepper at any point is crazy. it was clear after year 1 Rhule was the shits. Tepper is aggressive and that is what you want in an owner. his best trait though is he is not afraid to admit something didnt work any move away from it. 

You forget history in favor of that rosey picture my friend.

Are you a doctor?!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, ericr0319 said:

anyone that has thrown Shade at Tepper at any point is crazy. it was clear after year 1 Rhule was the shits. Tepper is aggressive and that is what you want in an owner. his best trait though is he is not afraid to admit something didnt work any move away from it. 

Aggressive wouldn’t be my #1 trait.   That can easily lead to just lots of dumb things.   

Tepper couldn’t admit to the mistake after we became a laughing stock after 2022.  He wasted an entire season in 2023 because he couldn’t admit the obvious. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, CRA said:

Lots of owners are hands on.

I’d say the majority are going to be in the mix for a #1 overall pick, especially one where they have up a lot of capital to get it. 

I think he will have input and it will matter.  Which makes sense.  

But he won’t be the one to make the pick and he has pretty much deferred to his coaches when the pick was made. If he didn’t then we would have Fields or Herbert since he wanted to move up for Herbert and wanted Fields as well. 
But he let Rhule pick both times. No reason to believe he won’t do it again with the new coaches. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, TLGPanthersFan said:

But he won’t be the one to make the pick and he has pretty much deferred to his coaches when the pick was made. If he didn’t then we would have Fields or Herbert since he wanted to move up for Herbert and wanted Fields as well. 
But he let Rhule pick both times. No reason to believe he won’t do it again with the new coaches. 

You rarely know the truth.  Sometimes it leaks out and sometimes that takes years.   Most owners I think are heavily involved in a #1 overall….especially one where you give up a ton for it. Which is rare.    Owners are the constant.   Which is why they rarely leave massive decisions completely to temp hires/new ones. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Going out and getting the #1 pick isn't going unappreciated here, what will become unappreciated is games. Everybody knew we were picking Cam. Let the community and player enjoy a coronation a celebration instead of needless nail-biting for the pleasure of exactly one.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Wolfcop said:

I agree, but they need to hit on the QB selection. 

I'm a lot less concerned with who they pick than I am who makes the pick.

As long as that decision is made by the football people, I'll be okay with it.

(even if it isn't my first choice)

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think what Tepper could change about his leadership especially as it relates to a public/private asset is more publicly deliberate moves. That's one thing we could appreciate about Mr Richardson you KNEW every season the direction the ship was going in a very deliberate and steady hand. 

We knew JR was going to spend every OTHER year, thus the huddle coined "one step forward two steps back".

We knew what would happen if a player disgraced himself in public. We ALL knew what was next from JR.

What I would say to Tepper is be more deliberate with these moves so the fans can celebrate together WITH you instead of the corporate cloak and dagger, information, disinformation route that has lead to his prior disasters and misjudgements.

Come to the huddle big boy. We're here to help.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The man is human.  He came in, and like ANYONE that doesn't have experience,  he made some mistakes. He has also owned everyone of them.  So from my perspective he never really deserved the hate, other than holding onto Rhule too long.  His desire to build a winner has never waivered.  

This definitely is the direction we as fans, have been wanting to see.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • It all sounds great. The only unknowns are injuries and how they will need to be addressed. Horn has a history as does the newly added Jaelen Phillips and Cooker has yet to play an entire season as well. And then there are the Ikey's - totally unexpecteded injuries that put a major wrench in your plans. I do think its a great plan though.
    • If we pay Bryce like a franchise QB we're completely and utterly buttfuged.
    • In my view, the realistic expectation for this team to compete will start 2027.  At that time, I think we could be looking at the following (this is HIGHLY speculative):   QB:  You know, Bryce.  I am not a fan, but they don't ask me.  But there is reason for hope--and here it is.  Bryce will be entering his prime.  Since we are likely to pay him, there will be changes that I include throughout this exercise--I realistically speculate on what they are going to do with Bryce and then I realistically speculate on what means in terms of the cap and other positions. Bryce HAS IMPROVED.  The idea is that if you give him more weapons and protection, that will continue.  His career:   At this rate, if his growth continues, by 2027 we should expect nearly 30 TDs and about 12 Interceptions and a Rating of about 98.  His completion percentage should settle at 65-66% or so.  If that happens, you can win with it. The following stats demonstrate how the Panthers will be able to afford it (and re-sign Ickey) My guess is they will require about $60m per year. This is why rookies who can play are important.  It also helps us see the blueprint.  You may disagree, but this is the cruel realities of the salary cap. Robert Hunt:  Cut post June 1 and save $19m.  Who do you replace him with?  Ickey. Tershawn Wharton:  Cutting him saves nearly $15m.  We should all hope to see Aaron Hall (UDFA) make the roster and play well.  Regardless, this is a position we would likely have to address in the next draft. Trevin Moehrig:  Cutting Moehrig as the starting SS saves this team $16.5m.   Ransom will be on year 3 of a cheap rookie deal and should be more than ready to take the reins.  their styles are similar.  Furthermore, FS Wheatley (R, 4th round) will be starting. Taylor Moton:  So much depends on his knee, but I have an idea that he can play another 3 years.  extending him could save the team about $5m per year.  Cutting him outright would save the team about $21m. In the most drastic situation, we have to cut Moton and the other three players mentioned.   We would need (in all likelihood) a starting DT and RT.  It is possible that the DE would be addressed, but Wharton's production (so far) could be equaled by a rookie.  Look for a cut free agent and a 2027 draft pick here.  If you cut Moton, you save $21m, and that would be the only big hole to fill.  Having Ickey at RG gives you some depth at T, and Ickey could be the guy.  T could be pick in the 2027 draft (first round), fwiw.  It saves you $21m while costing you $5m, for example. We get younger, creating a core of Freeling, Hecht, and the RT first rounder in 2027) along with Ekownu (second contract in the $15m range, and Lewis, whose contract would be in the $16m range if not extended.)  The OL cuts (Hunt, Moton) would save $40m.  The OL would get younger and still solid with veterans at G.   By cutting Wharton (no brainer if his play stays the same) and Moehrig (good player--but we have Ransom on a rookie contract who would not be that much of a drop off--if any) in addition to Hunt and Moton, we would save over $70m in cap room. We would be able to give Bryce bag  and we would have enough to re-sign Ickey (if the knee is not too risky) to a Guard contract (probably at a discount, coming off that injury).  Furthermore, we could add a RT in the draft (or a RG if Ickey moves to RT) and that would be the only large hole to fill. Correct my logic if you see issues-- On defense, in addition to the aforementioned, Scott ($2m contract) is out, replaced by a 4th round rookie contract. CB Jackson's contract ($7.8m) expires and he is (possibly) replaced by a rookie contract.  At Edge, patrick Jones II's $10m contract expires and he is likely a reserve, and his role is absorbed by Phillips, Scourton, Princely, and possible an UDFA like Isaiah Smith or a 2027 draft pick.   These productive developmental players over the past 2 drafts will pay huge dividends.  On paper, I see the team getting much younger and possibly better while cutting nearly $100m and reallocating that money to get more production.          
×
×
  • Create New...