Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Natalie Miller (aka Verge): per her sources, Panthers moved up to #1 to take Bryce Young


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

3 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

Whoever drafts him might want to take the QB Sneak out of the playbook. It’s a shame because it’s a high percentage play.

I think there will be some limitations to your playbook with him. I hope I'm wrong if he is the pick. Get ready for the hobbit and midget jokes also.  Especially if he gets hurt.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, Jon Snow said:

I think there will be some limitations to your playbook with him. I hope I'm wrong if he is the pick. Get ready for the hobbit and midget jokes also.  Especially if he gets hurt.

Oh yeah the first batted ball the Huddle will riot. However if we pass on him the Huddle will riot when he has game winning drives.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, ForJimmy said:

Oh yeah the first batted ball the Huddle will riot. However if we pass on him the Huddle will riot when he has game winning drives.

The Huddle will riot no matter who is drafted or not draft. The thing to remember is no matter what the Huddle will riot. All they need is a reason.  Any old reason will do.

  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Shocker said:

One thing that bugs me on going with Young over Stroud is upside.  I really don’t think we have seen the best from Stroud and he can get stronger and refine his game a lot.  It’s a difficult call without question 

I think more focus is more on the now and not enough long term. That's how I'm looking at this. Who's going to have the longest career for me if everything else being equal? How much time do I need to invest to ensure that all is equal or better? Lots to consider when you invest this much capital in an unknown. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I think there will be some limitations to your playbook with him. I hope I'm wrong if he is the pick. Get ready for the hobbit and midget jokes also.  Especially if he gets hurt.

 

1 hour ago, Jon Snow said:

I think there will be some limitations to your playbook with him. I hope I'm wrong if he is the pick. Get ready for the hobbit and midget jokes also.  Especially if he gets hurt.

I agree. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, ForJimmy said:

Oh yeah the first batted ball the Huddle will riot. However if we pass on him the Huddle will riot when he has game winning drives.

Huddle will bitch and moan about literally anything that happens.  Riot is a bit strong of a term. It's more like roosters crowing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Jackofalltrades said:

Stroud is a physical marvel, much like Cam, but a better passer. Threat to run with the ball in his hands but prefers to throw, has elite arm strength and ideal height. 

All the reasons I will be disappointed if he is not the pick. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

EVERYONE on this board gets flack at one point or another. Don't treat her like some fragile woman. Jesus. She can speak up for herself.

I mostly just put people on ignore unless they start straight up harassing me like one other dude on this forum.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Yeah I like Stroud I think but there is nothing to back that up.

He doesn't have elite arm or ideak height and I've not seen anybody suggesting that's what his strengths are other Ryan whoever above said that. None  of that is Strouds appeal 

Edited by csx
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Brooklyn 3.0 said:

EVERYONE on this board gets flack at one point or another. Don't treat her like some fragile woman. Jesus. She can speak up for herself.

you're smart enough to know there's a difference between flack and criticism and straight up insults, which have always received a warning or time-out on the Huddle.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, rodeo said:

you're smart enough to know there's a difference between flack and criticism and straight up insults, which have always received a warning or time-out on the Huddle.

Well yeah ... my point is we shouldn't go easy on Verge just because she's female. We're allowed to say her sources might be BS and her past info has led to nothing.

Anything with ill will toward her, well yes ... time-outs or bans. That's your job. Or Linville's.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share

×
×
  • Create New...