Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Draft visit news


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

On 4/2/2023 at 9:05 PM, 45catfan said:

JSN and Sanders are #39 targets.  Mingo, Jones and Brents are 3rd-4th round targets.  Pool is our late round guy.  I have no idea about the OT.

Less than 0% chance JSN is there at 39. He's looking like wr1 on most mocks at the moment

Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 4/2/2023 at 10:45 PM, Soul Rebel said:

I might be in the minority, but I don't want a LB with a pick in the first four rounds. Shaq is here for at least another year. We've got Luvu and Chinn...plus I think Brandon Smith is a future baller at ILB. I'd like to let this staff work with Smith for a year before we plunk down top-100 draft picks on a backer. 

Question marks about whether Chinn can make a full TD conversion to LB as well. 

I don't think Chin ever becomes a fulltime LB, more of a hybrid/big nickel guy. I think a lot of people are picturing Luvu as OLB instead of a ILB in this system. If that happens, ILB would become a need.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, shaqattaq said:

I don't think Chin ever becomes a fulltime LB, more of a hybrid/big nickel guy. I think a lot of people are picturing Luvu as OLB instead of a ILB in this system. If that happens, ILB would become a need.

I'll take Jack Campbell or Daiyan Henley at 39. I'd be on board for that.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Do they really think JSN or JPJ are available at 39 or would they really trade up to grab one of them after all they gave up for #1?

 

CB is pretty loaded this year with a lot of talent at similar levels, wouldn't be surprised if a CB is available at 39 we thought wouldn't be 

 

also due diligence in case he becomes available via trade or FA in a few years 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

13 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Do they really think JSN or JPJ are available at 39 or would they really trade up to grab one of them after all they gave up for #1?

 

Not sure if we're just doing our homework on guys like JSN and Porter in case they fall to #39 (that seems HIGHLY unlikely) or if those visits indicate we could potentially be in the market to jump back into the latter portion of the 1st if the right guy is there?  Hell, I guess there's a chance the JSN visit might be at least partially about getting more insight into Stroud too.

You only get 30 of these visits so they matter.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • the problem is if we're waiting for Cam v2, we're going to be waiting decades longer.  our best hope is that bryce is better than we all think he is and that canales is able to work some serious magic with him and the scheme to help him live up anywhere close to the potential we thought he had. he's a smart kid. we just have to be able to have a situation that allows him to use his smarts.  the truth with cam was that een he had to have a system tailored for his skillset coming into the league. the difference between him and luck (which was the debate in '09 when we thought luck was an option) was that with luck, he could be placed in any offense and it would work...hence the higher floor he had  than cam. cam, though, needed an offense that was built around him to reach his potential. he could have done alright in a more pro-style offense, but to reach his ceiling (which was seen by a lot of people as being higher than luck). i don't think having to have an offense tailored around what you can and can't do well is a problem for people who can develop around them...after they've truly identified what those can and can't items are. we didn't have that last year. i think we have that this year. we want a guy who can carry a team on his back, but those kind of guys are very rare. we don't need to spend our time trying  find that guy, because even when you have them there's no guarantee that they will be enough.  championships are won, quite often, by teams who learn to compensate for less than the greatest QB play. you have a great defense and can protect the ball while wearing out the other defense and you've got a chance.  we don't need Bryce to be superman (despite where we drafted him and what we paid to get him). we just need him to be able to run (manage) a good offense. 
    • The Panthers aren't building a Bryce Young roster. Alabama didn't recruit personnel to fit a Bryce Young scheme. Canales' approach is to build an NFL roster (which they didn't have last season) and then cater his scheme and playcalling to what the players do best. The team is not pigeon holing itself into an offense that doesn't fit any other QB. Their goal this off-season was to provide NFL average or better talent to the offense - period. Very little to do with matching personnel for  Bryce Young's skillset or lack thereof.
    • lol the time lapse version of Panthers breakdowns
×
×
  • Create New...