Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson Pro Day


OldhamA
 Share

Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

Did Will Levis have such a markedly better cast around him? He managed to complete 65% and I don’t see anybody banging the Levis drum. Maybe AR doesn’t throw a very catchable ball.

Will Levis threw a lot of screens from what I watched. I don't know if someone wants to find their passing charts for last year, but I would be Will's depth of through was much shorter. Also, Will Levis has played for multiple years in the college. In his first two years he had a 59% and 60% completion percentage, and then improved.

Edited by Krovvy
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Cam didn't need much around him at the NFL level either. Cam is a different breed. 

Our record during the Newton years would suggest otherwise.

Every quarterback needs a strong supporting cast. Newton was no exception. Neither is Richardson.

  • Pie 3
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, Jmac said:

I don't know if you throw dice with the #1 pick and hope it rolls your way.

I don’t believe it would be rolling the dice in him: this is just one example, but he has all the traits to be elite. His situation in Florida wasn’t the best, with our coaching staff, this kid will be special. Again, I dont think we take him, but there is a solid argument to. Great twitter thread on how good he can/will be at the pro level. 

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, The Lobo said:

I don’t believe it would be rolling the dice in him: this is just one example, but he has all the traits to be elite. His situation in Florida wasn’t the best, with our coaching staff, this kid will be special. Again, I dont think we take him, but there is a solid argument to. Great twitter thread on how good he can/will be at the pro level. 

 

One throw in a year full of bad ones does not make him ready. Okay, he did there, but can he do it consistently, that's what matters.

Edited by Jaxel
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Krovvy said:

Will Levis threw a lot of screens from what I watched. I don't know if someone wants to find their passing charts for last year, but I would be Will's depth of through was much shorter. Also, Will Levis has played for multiple years in the college. In his first two years he had a 59% and 60% completion percentage, and then improved.

Something I came across on twitter (@Statsowar)

 

WLchart.jpeg

ARchart.jpeg

Edited by Steelo Senpai
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

My question is why are you comparing him to Cam?

 

Cam didn't need much around him at the NFL level either. Cam is a different breed. 

Idk what you want from me, you aren’t reading my posts. Yes, Cam is a different breed, that is the whole point. We are drafting #1 overall, not #9, we should be looking for a different breed type guy. Young has “it”, Stroud has been so good he’s hard to overlook. I don’t think Richardson has “it”, or at least he hasn’t shown it if he does, he’s got more questions, and WAY worse tape.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

One throw in a year full of bad ones does not make him ready. Okay, he did there, but can he do it consistently, that's what matters.

That thread wasn’t just one throw, he cites and shows other examples. Dan Orlovsky has done the same thing on his twitter. Every qb has bad throws, ARs get magnified. 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, jayboogieman said:

Isn't this coaching staff, with their centuries of experience, the right staff to develop Richardson?

It doesn't sound like they are interested in drafting someone they can't start right away. They are priming this team to win now.

If they draft him, the goal will be to start him day 1. Dalton is there in case he's not ready, but I think they won't be wanting to let him sit a year. They'd come up with an offense built around what he can and can't do right now and develop him as they go, adding things to the offense as he progresses.

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Will be interesting to see how the Caps adjust. They were thoroughly beaten in this game despite it going to OT and they knew it by getting chippy. If they lose game 2 they’re in a hole they might not be able to dig themselves out of. They played old and tired tonight and I think they might get swept. 
    • He makes a good point about Wallace.  In fairness to Wallace it is hard to play your position as freely as you need to when your defensive line is getting pushed around like ragdolls.  One of the greatest attributes a defensive line has is sucking up blocks, freeing up your linebackers.  Our defensive line couldn't suck up a lollipop more or less blocks.  I think Evans, Sanders and Tremble are going to be a really nice TE group.  I can see all three getting time on the field.  If Sanders can improve as a blocker teams won't be so inclined to believe it is a pass play whenever Sanders is on the field.  Ryan Fitzgerald, I think was an awesome pick-up. Hopefully he can fill our kicker void. Luke Kandra many turn out to be our next Norwell.  Everything I have heard about him says he's a beast.  He needs some refinement, but the good news is he's got Hunt and Lewis (arguably the best guard tandem in the league) to learn from. 
    • Great teams build through the draft and have several young players that start that are on rookie contracts. It's important to hit on players in rounds 4 thru 7.  These should be future starters and solid depth.  When you hit on most of your picks you free up a lot of cap space for those one- or two-year players to fill spots you are thin at. No GM is going to perfect on all their picks.  You're going to whiff every once in a while.  That was Hurney problem.  He'd nail the first pick but after that it was reach after reach and we couldn't get any depth on this team. I'm excited about Morgan as our GM and hopefully he'll be around a long time.  It will be even better if Canales can continue to grow as a head coach, both in the development of young players and play calling. I remember last season after Young came back in the lineup and started to perform well.  We saw different plays I had only seen other teams use.   If Canales's play design and play calling continue to grow. Morgan and Canales will be linked together for a long time.  It would be nice to see a Coach and GM together for a decade or two. Go Panthers
×
×
  • Create New...