Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

NFL News


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

13 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

1 year 18 mill

 

LMFAOOOOOOOOOO

 

Even if it's "up to" 18 mill there's no way that base is less than 10 which is about 1.5x what he should be getting based on his injury history and age.

Does it really matter if they had the cap and no one else to really spend it on? 

Never cared for obj but it's a one year deal, if it was a multi year deal then they would be in trouble 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, PootieNunu said:

Does it really matter if they had the cap and no one else to really spend it on? 

Never cared for obj but it's a one year deal, if it was a multi year deal then they would be in trouble 

Until they have a QB on the roster.... theres someone else to spend it on. 

poo roll it over into next season when there is a much MUCH better market of available WRs

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, SteveSmithTD89 said:

Until they have a QB on the roster.... theres someone else to spend it on. 

poo roll it over into next season when there is a much MUCH better market of available WRs

They have $6M in space before OBJ because they have the $32M tag on Lamar. I'd assume that means a Lamar deal is imminent to shift a bunch of that to bonus money this year

  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

They have $6M in space before OBJ because they have the $32M tag on Lamar. I'd assume that means a Lamar deal is imminent to shift a bunch of that to bonus money this year

Seems like Lamar and the Ravens are just stuck with each other.  Must be a weird dynamic..

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 4
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Yep it's looking like the case. Im shocked nobody went after him though. Like nobody even offered a contract lol.

 

One of the weirdest negotiations I have witnessed especially from a franchise QB.

Sucks it happened to him, but after the Watson and Wilson contracts I'm guessing there's a bit of owner collusion to get these guaranteed contracts back down to the mid $100m's

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Nothing wrong with starting to look for bodies early. It's a long injury filled season. I doubt we get through unscathed. 
    • We're in alignment regarding Thielen not being a game changer/breaker for the Panthers. Getting the ball into hands of playmakers like TMac and XL is going to open up things more than it is getting it to Thielen underneath (or letting him go after 50/50 balls 20yds downfield in his mid-30s). However, in a room where the other guys are two second year guys and two rookies, having a reliable vet that they can learn from is just as important as it is for the QB to have as a reliable third option. I can see that being worth $8.5M (just 3%) of the $279.2M cap... especially when looking at what's left out there: https://www.spotrac.com/nfl/free-agents/_/position/wr However, the idea that the team is forcing production to Thielen and leading to losses isn't supported by the data. Targets, not receiving yards, are how you can tell if a player is being "force fed." In the two games mentioned, let's look at the other players available... vs. TB 10 targets - Adam Thielen 9 targets - David Moore 8 targets - Tommy Tremble, Xavier Legette 3 targets - Jonathon Brooks 1 target - Dan Chisena, Feleipe Franks, Stephen Sullivan vs. PHI 11 targets - Adam Thielen 8 targets - Xavier Legette 5 targets - Chuba Hubbard, David Moore 2 targets - Tommy Tremble 1 target - Ja'Tavion Sanders, Deven Thompkins There isn't exactly a bounty of other names to throw the ball to. In those games, AT was one of the top 2 WRs. Diontae had been gone by that point.   So... yea. Agreed that Thielen isn't exactly carrying the team in his mid-30s, but it's undeniable that he was the most reliable target last season that still has quite a bit of value this season. Whether or not that value is reflected in a manner folks think on the contract is going to come down to personal taste. However, the idea that the team was forcing production to AT and that was the reason behind some losses couldn't be further from the truth.
    • I would also add that I think it's more than money.  AT has looked absolutely miserable out there at times, and there was a lot of speculation he would demand to be traded.  Personally, I thought he was a lock to be moved last year.  Maybe his hamstring is the only thing that prevents that from happening. The fact that he's not only willing to come back and play, but excited about it, really bodes well for Bryce.  AT is a veteran and he knows the game.  If he didn't have confidence in Bryce, I guarantee you he wouldn't be in a Panther uniform this year.  I'll take that as a positive.
×
×
  • Create New...