Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Jim Nagy on Panthers #1 pick


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

14 minutes ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

From what Nagy was saying that Tepper had some kind of influence by talking to Saban in his office talking about Young. 

Tepper is leaving the decision to the football people, same as he did with Fields.

That's per his own words.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

20 minutes ago, USDepartmentOfSavagery said:

Stroud supporters love discounting reports when it’s pro Young, but when it’s pro Stroud it’s crickets lmao. 

There aren't any "reports" on any side. Everything that's been posted is somebody's speculation or opinion.

The only actual reports that have been put out have said that the decision isn't made yet. That's even been confirmed by Darin Gantt.

Anybody claiming to have knowledge of who to pick definitely will be is lying.

Edited by Mr. Scot
  • Pie 4
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

34 minutes ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

Can we just make one thread for the latest hot take reporter post? 

We need 2. One titled ”Young, no, Stroud!” and another titled “Stroud, no, Young!”. Should cover 90% of the posts for the next few weeks.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Mr. Scot said:

There aren't any "reports" on any side. Everything that's been posted is somebody's speculation or opinion.

The only actual reports that have been put out have said that the decision isn't made yet. That's even been confirmed by Darin Gantt.

Anybody claiming to have knowledge of who to pick definitely will be is lying.

That’s a lot of text. And I saw some italics so I took a shot of crown. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Yeah they were bad QBs - but QB's that stayed on their teams for several years.  BY is better than all of those. 
    • This is the right move even if you think Bryce isn't the future. Everything except signing him to a long term deal until proven otherwise. There's a decent chance we have a shot to draft a QB next year that we like. 
    • If we're still bad enough that Canales gets fired, especially if it's during the season, there is no way we could ever attract any HC worthy of the job if we told them they had to keep Bryce their first year. That would be 2 coaches he's gotten fired and 4 years of not performing up to par. I still say replace both of them next offseason.  I like Canales the man and I think he's done an absolutely outstanding job at fixing our locker room issues, as it was really bad before he showed up.  But I just don't see it from him with his in game decision making, I think he's held us back just as much as Bryce has, just in different ways. Canales was our Dan Campbell, the coach you hire to turn the franchises culture around for the HC after them to inherit and take to the next level.   The difference was he had some elite coordinators early on and really let him focus on his "leader of men" role as opposed to the X's and O's that Canales does himself and it's turned out well for him.
×
×
  • Create New...