Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Which QB Best Fits Reichs RPO Style Offense?


chknwing
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 hours ago, mrcompletely11 said:
2 hours ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Bingo.

Watch UNC's offense at the college level to see a classic RPO offense. The majority of RPO plays is the QB reading the defense at the mesh point with the RB before deciding to let the RB keep it or pull it and throw.

 

There’s also a lot of rollouts and playaction that interrupts reading the defense due to having your back to the LOS on snap and necessitates  a lot of maneuverability to navigate the blitz situation quickly enough to start making second and third level reads. Snaps from shotgun are exactly what you mentioned but there’s a lot under center unless you tear those plays out of the book. There’s generally a correlation between use of RPO and QB mobility. They have to arrive at that mesh point somehow and we’re talking about a game that measures release time of QBs down to milliseconds, so it goes without saying that they have to account for clean footwork and quickness. It’s not exclusive to mobile quarterbacks, but I think success rate is influenced by variables that favor that skill set. 
 

As an aside, both QBs we should be considering are only negligible in difference in this respect. Both have the required mobility to evade the blitz. 

Edited by SameDamnThing
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SameDamnThing said:

There’s also a lot of rollouts and playaction that interrupts reading the defense due to having your back to the LOS on snap and necessitates  a lot of maneuverability to navigate the blitz situation quickly enough to start making second and third level reads. Snaps from shotgun are exactly what you mentioned but there’s a lot under center unless you tear those plays out of the book. There’s generally a correlation between use of RPO and QB mobility. They have to arrive at that mesh point somehow and we’re talking about a game that measures release time of QBs down to milliseconds, so it goes without saying that they have to account for clean footwork and quickness. It’s not exclusive to mobile quarterbacks, but I think success rate is influenced by variables that favor that skill set. 
 

As an aside, both QBs we should be considering are only negligible in difference in this respect. Both have the required mobility to evade the blitz. 

What does the under center stuff have to do with this discussion? We already had a thread highlighting CJ had 120 something snaps under center and Bryce had 4. Bryce will probably not be under center unless it's an obvious short yardage handoff, I don't think he'll be very good at play action against NFL defenses

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Can't wait until the draft gets here. Looking at most things we have heard, Stroud seems to be the perfect fit but then we hear about the emphasis on intelligence, calm under pressure, leadership and we are then left thinking, "Well poo... could it be Young?"

Got to say, after the previous regime having more leaks than the Titanic that it's nice to not know what's going on. Finally, some professionals handling business.

Edited by Icege
  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Martin said:

A lot of people downplay Strouds processing and understanding of the game, not sure why?

Simple bias. Calling any of these QB prospects "elite" before a single NFL snap is an obvious giveaway. They all have to prove it at this level same as any QB before them.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, frankw said:

Simple bias. Calling any of these QB prospects "elite" before a single NFL snap is an obvious giveaway. They all have to prove it at this level same as any QB before them.

What? They’re prospects you even said so yourself. Of course there are elite prospects with elite traits. Any college player can be a bust but you draft based on college production which stroud and young both had elite careers. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, jb2288 said:

What? They’re prospects you even said so yourself. Of course there are elite prospects with elite traits. Any college player can be a bust but you draft based on college production which stroud and young both had elite careers. 

In a short time we've gone over their traits to an adnauseum point. Yes certain traits can translate right away especially physical ability. But from viewing the dialogue in relation to the mental aspect I'm definitely seeing Young receive not only the benefit of the doubt but elevation to elite status over Stroud. His tape would argue the gap is not at all as wide as some of the outspoken supporters would suggest. That isn't to say Stroud isn't without his cons. But I have yet to see any definitive proof CJ is significantly deficient in this area. Just my thoughts.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I really think they traded up for Young, with CJ as a plan B if the Texans wanted Young so bad they made a trade. Young is generational. Listen to the interviews. He played against some serious competition. I like both, but Young is Peyton Manning smart, just in a small body. They way they protect the QBs these days I don't think it's an issue (anybody can get hurt on any given play). Like I said, I think they like CJ if they had to draft #2 and got some picks out of it. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Also why are people assuming RPO involves the QB running? It's usually a hand off/one read pass option

It doesn’t have to involve QB running for the QB to take more hits. If the QB is holding the ball in the RBs gut they just tee off on the QB whether he pulls the ball back or not.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I'm n9tnsure anyone can adequately downplay a college players ability when the reality is we really don't know. Making assumptions is still making assumptions.  

Assuming the best QB in the draft couldn't run an RPO, is ridiculous.  Now whether or not an RPO or other offense would be best for Young, is really for the coaches to decide anyways. 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

It's good to see him on his feet, he got royally screwed

Yep, sucks getting picked by a coach in over his head then getting hurt then the coach getting fired. I hope he can salvage a career but I honestly just don't see many signs he's part of our plan moving forward.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I thought he had a few really nice flashes.  I can see him showing out this year 
    • I have heard that before--when standing in front of a full body mirror at Old Navy.  I said it, actually. Seriously, Let's go on what we know. There is reason for optimism that exceeds random opinions and negativity: 1. Last year, the offense was the priority and the interior offensive line was the focal point. Morgan addressed it in free agency and the draft. They improved.  2.  Last year, Canales pulled Young after 2 games and replaced him with an established veteran.  Instead of giving up on Young, he developed him, primarily focusing on his footwork and timing.  Continued development in his fundamentals should result in improved play.  (this is significant because some athletes rely on natural ability and do not adapt well.  They resort to old habits. This means that Bryce is "teachable" and is willing to face adversity and fight through it.  That is what you want in a QB.) 3. Morgan drafted a raw talent at WR; and we all knew he was raw.  Huddlers are already calling it a bust, but his productivity numbers were in line with the other WRs drafted around where he was drafted.  So, yes, he was a bit disappointing, but what part of "Raw" is not understood here?  Evil Bryce, then inconsistent Dalton, then good Bryce--all while facing the top defensive backs--and let's not forget about his lingering injuries--and we should understand XL's productivity.  Morgan was looking for a home run based on XL's 1-season productivity and his freakish athleticism, but I always thought we would not know what we have until year 2.  TMac alone will make XL better--a solid #2. 4.  If you blame Morgan for drafting XL, you must give him credit for making Coker a priority free agent.  In my view, he addressed WR in 2024 pretty effectively in the long view.  5.  Let's look at the rest of the draft.  Brooks?  The best RB in the draft in round 2?  Morgan was attempting to build a solid run game behind Bryce.  Wallace was a very solid third round pick at LB. Sanders is a strong TE for a fourth round pick. 6.  Not much is being said about the development of Chau Smith-Wade.  His improvement mirrors Bryce Young's, actually.  In his first 8 games, his PFF rating was 36.5.  In the final 9 games, his PFF rating was 66.7.   7.  With so many needs, Morgan hit the UDFA market with success. In addition to Coker, Demani Richardson got 400+ snaps and had a 60.1 PFF grade, including an interception. 8.  In free agency, Morgan spent big bucks on Guards, a move that made his QB better. He added David Moore, Nijman,  He signed Clowney, Wonnum, Robinson, Jewel, Chaisson, Fuller, Scott, D. Jackson, Dionte Johnson, etc.  A few years of Fitterer left him with more holes that players.  Some did not work out, but he did all this on a budget (after he splurged on Lewis and Hunt).  It is hard to get a free agent to come to a team that loses--so in some cases, Morgan had to overpay or accept questionable players. Morgan's first year as a GM demonstrated an understanding of the game like we have not seen since Polian, before his lost it. Canales, on the other hand, should be rated by the improvement of players.  Zavala, Ekwonu, Mays, Young, Smith-Wade, Coker, Wallace--all improved.  He had to overcome major losses such as D. Brown, Shaq, Dionte Johnson, Corbett--and we saw growth.  Despite all this team went through, after 8 games of disarray, This team finished 4-5 with close losses to both Super Bowl teams.  Frankly, I do not know how he did it. This year was better.  The WR room is solid with depth.  The OL room is solid with depth.  The TE room is as good as it has been in a while.  The RB room has the potential to be as good as it was when we had 28 and 34.  DBs?  Better.  DL?  Better.  Edge?  better.  The bottom of the roster?  Much better. We really don't know what we have yet, and that makes this offseason exciting.      
    • Here you go. 2 yards. Bryce Sneak.mp4
×
×
  • Create New...