Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Young's built sturdier than Stroud per BMI


MechaZain
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, rayzor said:

those who are worried about his durability are always going to be worried about it.

he could be playing for 7 years before he misses time and you'll hear them all say, "you see, i was right! i'm always right. you all should have listened to me!"

I wouldn't go that far 😄

I will say though that I'm probably going to be crossing myself every time he takes a hit...and I'm not Catholic 😕

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I just asked a magic 8-ball website if the panthers should choose Bryce Young and it said "Yes, definitely." I then asked if they should choose C. J. Stroud and it said, "Ask again later."

I dunno what this means, but it has about as much significance as all this other crap combined.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, MechaZain said:

Not building a workout routine here just comparing two guys. I think it's more accurate than the Huddle eye test.

But you're comparing 2 guys using a metric that doesn't accurately measure athletes due to their higher % of muscle mass. Doesn't matter if it's more accurate than the Huddle eye test or not, it's still not accurate. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, rayzor said:

those who are worried about his durability are always going to be worried about it.

he could be playing for 7 years before he misses time and you'll hear them all say, "you see, i was right! i'm always right. you all should have listened to me!"

The game threads are gonna get old so fast with the freak outs i'm sure.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rayzor said:

those who are worried about his durability are always going to be worried about it.

he could be playing for 7 years before he misses time and you'll hear them all say, "you see, i was right! i'm always right. you all should have listened to me!"

Actually,  7 years in he would prove me wrong about the durability concerns. Well past it, 7 years he would be on a second contract.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The "YOUNGSTERS" are desperately trying to convince us that less is more.

Dumb move. Not big enough for the NFL. He should get into bowling. What's next?? The best 5'10" volleyballer?! It won't work he's not playing against future salesmen or accountants the NFL is full of physical freaks, ya boy , sooner than later will get smashed.

If he were my son I'd be excited for him but that reality that he's fighting out of his weight class would be terrifying. Some fans don't care they just want to "see" him do it.

I DON'T want to see it happen, but it's likely, that's why I rather it happen in another uniform.

Heard the Texans like Will Anderson so all the Bryce hype and gamesmanship may be for not.

  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, Jackie Lee said:

Here he's still rocking a little bit of his combine dad bodHDcPRSLb.thumb.jpeg.e1162a7c8985ba703b20ec48755754d8.jpeg

Look how sweaty he is. We should measure how much sweat Young v Stroud had on their pro day. /s

 

Seriously tho can't wait till Carolina picks. Whoever they choose. I don't care who it is. Just let the madness stop.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

31 minutes ago, mrcompletely11 said:

7 games would do it for me

I would like for him to make it threw the whole season healthy. I dont think 7 games will say too much as im looking at from a standpoint of how much punishment can he take before getting a injury. I dont think he gonna take one hit and get hurt significantly that quick. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • He can’t even learn to run routes. No chance in hell he can do both that and pick up blocking schemes 
    • Well he had essentially a 70% completion rate for almost three thousand yards.  Biggest issues were awkward and inconsistent release.  I wouldn't call arm strength bad, but not great.    
    • I see him being better and most of that is a few downfield passes that were seemingly non existent.    But it is what is around him that has dictated the trajectory more than the quarterbacking. He is game manager level and unable to dictate to defenses.  And even if I am wrong and he is the reason we ‘upwarded’, we are bumping our heads on the ceiling and only making meager gains. If it is an incline it is awfully shallow degree wise. Like a finance graph that tracks your progress and hovers around the rate of inflation. Barely breaking even.  Is that where you want your money?  We make up these deadlines expectations and generally he does the minimum of what he needs to do to hang around.    It does not encourage me to believe that when we get into a game against a good run d that we cannot break down with our run game, to believe that we can pivot to the air and successfully counter their strategy.  But they run it back again. Of course I am gunshy of a repeat of the same thing we have watched for three years.    oh, and yes his durability is his most impressive positive for my money. I fear the other shoe dropping on that and the contractual consequences that will follow.   Last  of all, too late to edit my mistake here but would like to acknowledge it: the last three years has done very little to convince me that I was not wrong in not wanting him. One too many “not”s. 
×
×
  • Create New...