Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ellis Williams charlotte observer Mock draft Apr 10


raleigh-panther
 Share

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, CPF4LIFE said:

I wouldnt call the line elite at all and 2 starters wont even be ready to start the season and its up in the air if they will even be the same players when they come back. Better hope it works out that way.

I'm in the camp that thinks our OL is not the level some fans have gone ahead and declared it to be. Like okay admittedly Sam Darnold was a poo QB as was Baker but the oline didn’t do them favors. But for some reason some folks see inserting a QB smaller than any of last years quarterbacks Corral included who got pummeled in preseason as profit. You have to laugh a little at the situation.

Edited by frankw
  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think missing out on an edge is a huge mistake, but I see this draft.  Why is everyone drafting Guards when we have no real backup plan at T, unless we really like the player we signed off the Dolphins' Practice Squad last year.  A T is more likely to move inside to G than a G to a T--so I am thinking depth here.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'm in the camp that thinks our OL is not the level some fans have gone ahead and declared it to be. Like okay admittedly Sam Darnold was a poo QB as was Baker but the oline didn’t do them favors. But for some reason some folks see inserting a QB smaller than any of last years quarterbacks Corral included who got pummeled in preseason as profit. You have to laugh a little at the situation.

BC was not that good at LG, but I think he should improve.  As Ekwonu and BC improved, then we finally put Bozeman in, the OL got pretty solid.  We will need to be very stout up the middle--and I like what I saw of Cade in limited action.  not elite, but good.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

like it a lot, but I'm not wild about Darnell in the second.   Love the 3rd round pick.  don't know if he played with Ickey at State but he might have, and that relationship could make the transition easier.

Also I'm not really ready to spend a pick in this draft on an RB.  Too many other needs, but if it's the right guy at the right time of the draft, I'm fine with it.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

55 minutes ago, frankw said:

I'm in the camp that thinks our OL is not the level some fans have gone ahead and declared it to be. Like okay admittedly Sam Darnold was a poo QB as was Baker but the oline didn’t do them favors. But for some reason some folks see inserting a QB smaller than any of last years quarterbacks Corral included who got pummeled in preseason as profit. You have to laugh a little at the situation.

 

You know what would be funny. Drafting Young and putting him behind the same line that got Corral injured. Oh wait, we can't. None of those guys are still around. If you have to make things up, your point may be too weak to start with.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

50 minutes ago, MHS831 said:

I think missing out on an edge is a huge mistake, but I see this draft.  Why is everyone drafting Guards when we have no real backup plan at T, unless we really like the player we signed off the Dolphins' Practice Squad last year.  A T is more likely to move inside to G than a G to a T--so I am thinking depth here.

I, for 1, think that Christiansen is good back up tackle if either go down and a quality guard is a lot easier to find than a quality tackle on day 3. I could also see bringing back Erving for T depth, Free agency has not been his friend, so he'd be a cheap signing.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

You know what would be funny. Drafting Young and putting him behind the same line that got Corral injured. Oh wait, we can't. None of those guys are still around. If you have to make things up, your point may be too weak to start with.

In total fairness iamhubby1 if it were up to you and your sunshine and rainbows crew we would still be starting Darnold.

Sponge Bob Shut Up GIF by SpongeBob SquarePants

Edited by frankw
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, frankw said:

In total fairness iamhubby1 if it were up to you and your sunshine and rainbows crew we would still be starting Darnold.

United Unity GIF by INTO ACTION

 

Typical of you. Deflect, and attack. I guess when you can't validate your point, that's all that's left. 

 

That's funny too. "Sunshine and Rainbow crew". Nothing but insults from you. But hey, at least you are consistent. Care to name a few of our members? Or is that too much to ask?

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, Gerry Green said:

 

Typical of you. Deflect, and attack. I guess when you can't validate your point, that's all that's left. 

 

That's funny too. "Sunshine and Rainbow crew". Nothing but insults from you. But hey, at least you are consistent. Care to name a few of our members? Or is that too much to ask?

 

 

I need to name names? Anyone who has perused the huddle the last 6 months or so has seen the folks who kept saying give Darnold another chance lol.

As skeptical as I am of Young I'll take his potential ten times out of ten over that.

Appreciate the convo 🫡

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Big whatever on the NFL #1. Until someone actually does and changes the paradigm, you just do not take a player that size for that position at 1.1.
If this needs to be explained to you I seriously hope you are not named Frank Reich, Scott Fitterer or David Tepper. 
 
I would buy that the NFL is going flag football just without the flags, and if Tepper has assessed things that way, and that is why they may be serious…  I yield my opposition.  
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • As much as I despise Billy B, his philosophy on QBs is how I would approach things if I were a GM. You always keep looking for your next starter.  He has Bledsoe, who got injured and his backup ended up being the GOAT. Even while he had that going, he kept getting his next guy and developing them. When Brady got hurt, Cassel stepped in and went 11-5 and they missed the wild card by dumb luck. Who knows how far they would have gone if they had gotten in. Jimmy Gs career started in NE. There were others, but he always kept looking.  You can't be afraid to keep looking for your next starter, but it looks like we're afraid to look for more than a marginal one. If you're going to offer a $25m contract with incentives, that screams marginal QB. It also screams you're just a transition until we find our guy. After a 10 or 11 win season, he's not accepting that offer. And then you're in a Daniel Jones situation. Do you pay for a year of success and pray it wasn't a one year wonder?  To this point, Bryce has really produced nothing, yet for whatever reason, our FO has not even sniffed at the idea that we need a real QB room with real QBs. Dalton was never starter potential, Plummer was a joke. KP certainly isn't, neither is Grier.  Our approach to the QB room needs to be one of strength not fear. Bring in guys who can compete or who you think can compete. This is THE elite position, in an elite sport, paid premium salary, where production matters. Either you produce or you can lose your job. It's not mean, it's just the reality of the position.  And I'm really just tired of our candy ass approach to it. 
    • If you plug Bryce onto the Pro Bowl roster you might have a chance to compete for a SB. If he's surrounded by top tier talent with a top tier defense on the other side, a field flipping punter, and a kicker good from 60+ you might have a chance. But that means you basically have to recreate Saban's Bama in the NFL and that's impossible... and Bryce couldn't win a championship in that environment either. What the Panthers didn't realize when they got so obsessed with his "PG mentality" was that what they were looking st was a "barely checks the box PG". The basketball equivalent of Bryce would be an undersized PG with marginal athleticism who can make the basic plays but adds nothing to the team in terms of elevating the overall team. Not a great shooter, not a great defender, not a great driver. Just a guy who can basically get you into the offense and be a matador on defense. Basically a placeholder while you look to upgrade the PG position. 
×
×
  • Create New...