Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Anthony Richardson “knocked” S2 cognitive test “out of the park”.

DFive

By DFive,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
6 hours ago, rebelrouser said:

So AR's camp releases a vague unsubstantiated rumor.  Surprised this didn't happen earlier. and what exactly does out of the park mean?

I mean they're not fooling anyone - the NFL teams have access to all of these scores. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, rebelrouser said:

By tape do you mean highlights? Because i watched complete games and he was complete crap. Maybe he is the ultimate qb mind in the ultimate qb body that only completes 53.8% of his passes.  Was he day dreaming out there or something?

If you're box score scouting you won't like Richardson.

If you watch the tape you're blown away by him. He obviously needs work (he's 20 years old), but as said earlier today, he makes incredibly difficult stuff look easy.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites
OldhamA Grand Master

OldhamA

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, Varking said:

Bryce was not the best QB in college for 2 years now. Hooker was outplaying him until injury, Caleb Williams outplayed him. 
 

And you think there aren’t risks taking a dude who had dud performances against Texas and LSU? Or that while he was out the backup QB who couldn’t even play QB scored 3 TDs? And that a Bryce lead team didn’t make the playoffs in his final year? 
 

Every QB in this class has reasons to be concerned over their performance. 

I mean if you're box score scouting, Stroud had a better year than Young this year too (you could argue for Clayton Tune too, but I wouldn't do that).

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
35 minutes ago, OldhamA said:

If you're box score scouting you won't like Richardson.

If you watch the tape you're blown away by him. He obviously needs work (he's 20 years old), but as said earlier today, he makes incredibly difficult stuff look easy.

This gonna shock people

 

Nfl red flags... he's got the least by looking at tape. 

 

Stroud actually has a narrow build and has pocket issues when he isn't cleanly protected.  

 

Young has a slight build and is small in height which is a huge red flag in the NFL. I mean he's not even as thickly built as Murry. 

 

Richardson has mechanic issues that look fixable and lack of college experience compared to the above 2... 

 

That lack of experience is actually a good thing in his case because that makes you think the mechanics are fixable and word about his work ethic and football iq makes me think he'll work his ass off to fix them and succeed doing so. 

  • Pie 7
  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
rippadonn Grand Master

rippadonn

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, carpanfan96 said:

This gonna shock people

 

Nfl red flags... he's got the least by looking at tape. 

 

Stroud actually has a narrow build and has pocket issues when he isn't cleanly protected.  

 

Young has a slight build and is small in height which is a huge red flag in the NFL. I mean he's not even as thickly built as Murry. 

 

Richardson has mechanic issues that look fixable and lack of college experience compared to the above 2... 

 

That lack of experience is actually a good thing in his case because that makes you think the mechanics are fixable and word about his work ethic and football iq makes me think he'll work his ass off to fix them and succeed doing so. 

AR going to Pete Carroll would scare me enough to pick him #1 if I were Frank Reich a QB whisperer in my own right.

Nightmares.

  • Pie 3
  • Poo 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted

I’m done with this argument.. At this point dude’s will claim they saw something on tape that really isn’t there and they will give excuses for things that they don’t do for others and they are letting workouts in underware overvalue actual productions, actual achievements and actual numbers.. 

Like I said in another thread only thing that stoping Richardson for being number 1.. Is the 3 years he spent in college… He could have just showed up to the combine and had some of you drooling about potential and rode that better.. Then actually having film out there.. 

Leon Sancastle anyone

 

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
carpanfan96 Grand Master

carpanfan96

Posted
Posted
7 hours ago, WOW!! said:

I’m done with this argument.. At this point dude’s will claim they saw something on tape that really isn’t there and they will give excuses for things that they don’t do for others and they are letting workouts in underware overvalue actual productions, actual achievements and actual numbers.. 

Like I said in another thread only thing that stoping Richardson for being number 1.. Is the 3 years he spent in college… He could have just showed up to the combine and had some of you drooling about potential and rode that better.. Then actually having film out there.. 

Leon Sancastle anyone

 

I honestly don't care about his combined performance,  it's what I've heard about his whiteboard work and meetings more than anything.  Considering he's the only one of the top three qb's with prototypical nfl frame and size. 🤷‍♂️

Link to comment
Share on other sites
WOW!! Grand Master

WOW!!

Posted
Posted
17 hours ago, carpanfan96 said:

I mean tape not highlights. From pre snap to the throw, the processing and football iq is easily seen. It's the mechanics breakdown on throws that causes the majority of his issues 

Yeah got you..

okay addition.. 

Some ppl are valuing 3rd party views of a event they weren’t actually at and “prototype”  measurements over actual film, numbers and performances..

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Mistuh Jones
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By Mistuh Jones · Posted

      This is gonna be longest six weeks ever 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      This 1000%.  Hey who wants to sign with the guy that couldn't even get his client the guaranteed contract of a 3rd round pick?  Lmao
    • tukafan21
      Wild Idea.. Trade for Shemar Stewart

      By tukafan21 · Posted

      I don't think it's any weird or unique clause, it's the offset language, same thing so many contract disputes are over. It just means that including it, if a player is cut and then signed by another team, the original team would be able to subtract how much they're getting paid by the new team from what they still owe him on their guaranteed money. For example, it's why Russell Wilson signed for the minimum last year with the Steelers as that was included in his Denver contract.  So if he signed with the Steelers for $1 million, he'd get $1 million less from the Broncos, if it was $2 million, he'd get $2 million less, basically he couldn't make any more money than he was already going to make, so you sign for the minimum to not take unnecessary cap room from your new team while giving extra cap room to your old one. The problem with trying to include it in rookie deals is that a team trying to include it, it says they think they don't really believe the player will make it 4 years with the team before they cut them.  And this usually comes up with one or two rookies in most seasons, the difference is it's usually handled much more quietly and not as public and ugly as this one. The other difference is that it's happening with the Bengals, which I believe I saw are one of the few (or only?) team that doesn't have protections for rookies in rookie and mini camps to be able to participate even if they haven't signed their contract yet.  The other teams have injury protections that allow them to still play, but the Bengals do not, which is also why this one is so public and ugly, as most the time this happens, the rookie is still participating in the rookie and subsequent mini camps, giving them more time to get the contract done before training camp when they'd then hold out.
×
×
  • Create New...