Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Albert Breer: Bryce Young scored 98 on his S2 teat


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

15 minutes ago, Varking said:

I’m sure you can understand that if you were practicing taking the SATs or ACTs or any random test since 9th grade… studying and then taking it every year all the way to your junior year of college you might have an advantage over those seeing it for the very first time?

So what? I would be good at take SATs.  Ok.  This is a negative somehow?  This is totally irrelevant IMO.  Just say you like CJ more no need to try to discredit Young being good at these tests 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Why should this bother anyone?  He is very good at it since high school.  This doesn't discount anything.  

Yeah I dont get it.  I doubt the questions are the same each time.  Its like someone taking the SAT 4 times to get a 1580.  Still a helluva score any way you slice it.  And good on him for actually preparing for what he knew would be an important part of his overall evaluation. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, PleaseCutStewart said:

While that score is very impressive, hasn't he taken it a ton of times before (If I remember hearing that correctly)? If that is the case, I think that would help lead to getting a higher score since you know what to expect, as opposed to taking it for the first time.

Im not sure thats exactly how it works. There are definitely limitations to how fast someone can process things regardless of doing the test multiple times.  Im fairly sure its randomized and the examples ive heard were things like 5 shapes flash up and one is different in some way and how many tenths of a second it takes you to recognize the different one.   Its almost a measure of impulse.  I know it takes a specific computer setup and network to make sure there is 0 latency to measure the tenths of a seconds or even less accurately.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, joemac said:

Yeah I dont get it.  I doubt the questions are the same each time.  Its like someone taking the SAT 4 times to get a 1580.  Still a helluva score any way you slice it.  And good on him for actually preparing for what he knew would be an important part of his overall evaluation. 

The test doesn't have questions as far as I understand it. I'd call them 'exercises.'

Link to comment
Share on other sites

27 minutes ago, Shocker said:

Why should this bother anyone?  He is very good at it since high school.  This doesn't discount anything.  

The people who want to discount him will use it to discount him.  Discount any positive and constantly talk about his size.  Anything positive is a smokescreen and if hes the pick its because Tepper made the pick.   Same ol song and dance, I don't think im forgetting anything.

 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, NAS said:

Exactly people comparing this to SAT is just dumb. It’s not an Intelligence test, it purely measures processing speed of your brain which you can’t learn or get better at, maybe marginally.

My long term loss of short term memory would equal an easy flunking of this test.  No matter how many times I took it.  

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, MHS831 said:

Why not say, "Of course his 40 time is good--he has been running it since high school!"

 

This is a good example but a bad example at the same time. If you run the 40 yard dash daily, you will get faster at it to a point. Better technique will get you faster. Better body conditioning will get you faster. There are things you can do to improve at it. I'm not sure how one would improve at the S2 specifically. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • You are right--it was DC.  I remember talking to him at Belk in Albemarle one day--the Panthers were on a bye and they were (at the time) a disapointing 4-4.  I mentioned that the record was disappointing and he seemed to get a bit annoyed.  He dId not say anything.  I trying to suggest that we will get better, but I think he was pretty upset about it.  No hard feelings, but the man was simply trying to shop with his wife and this annoying jerk starts making comments about his job---I get it.  I apologized, telling him that I was trying to be supportive and not critical--he did not think it was a big deal.  I'd see him at events from time to time-he'd wave or say hi, but it was awkward for me.  Figured I would say something stupid.  Jordan was pretty popular--nothing like she seems to be now--she is holding her own in a man's world...proud of her.
    • Like we have had the last 3 years.
    • In May of 2026, it looks like a challenging schedule...and it probably is.  I rarely listen to the "strength of schedule" conversations that light up social media this time of year. Each year teams improve and decline. I think there's chunks of the year we need to take care of business and the week 5 bye is not desired.  I do think if we don't hit the bye week at 3-1, it's going to be a major uphill battle given the schedule in front of us. This season falls on three people, regardless of schedule strength: Canales, Bryce, Evero.  Canales: Finally can truly coach all aspects of the team and not focus with gameday prep for OC duties anymore. He drives the bus and needs to get these guys in position to win each week. There's no way vets come in and put it on the line every week to watch our QB sh!t the bed (See: SF game last year). Bryce: Despite everyone's obsession with thinking Bryce is a guaranteed extension, I think this year will truly be his "prove it" year. If he comes out the way he has the past three years, I really don't see how vets and coaches can continue to put him under center long-term. He might play out that fifth year as the starter, but I think next offseason his long-term replacement is found. I also think there's no excuses with the weapons and commitment we've made on offense to insulate him with every possible weapon.  Evero: Best personnel he's had since he's been here...no excuses. Figure out how to blitz effectively. Figure out how to use CBs whose strengths are press/man. Figure out how to utilize a talented front-7 to get the hell of the field. Outside of FS and maybe....maybe ILB, there are few weaknesses on this unit. 
×
×
  • Create New...