Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

REPORT: Bryce Young scored 98 out of 99 on his S2 cognitive test


TheSpecialJuan
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, Castavar said:

I have a feeling Stoud's score isn't being leaked so it won't hurt his draft stock. I have a feeling his agent went around pleading with teams to withhold that info until after the draft. The fact it isn't being leaked means he must have posted a very mediocre or bad S2 score.

Teams already know his score.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Castavar said:

I have a feeling Stoud's score isn't being leaked so it won't hurt his draft stock. I have a feeling his agent went around pleading with teams to withhold that info until after the draft. The fact it isn't being leaked means he must have posted a very mediocre or bad S2 score.


If teams know, then it will hurt his draft stock. At this point it’s just about keeping it from the public.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Should have gotten a perfect score since he's been taking it since high-school, am I right?

Billy Marshal hosted the co-owner of S2 and he said practicing doesn't improve your score to a great degree. Studies with top athletes at several schools who take the test from high school to their senior year in college only see roughly ~5 point difference even taking it for years.

Edited by Jaxel
  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Jon Snow said:

Should have gotten a perfect score since he's been taking it since high-school, am I right?

Thats definitely not how it works.  They had the guys who created it on The Roar podcast and they specifically asked them questions about stuff like that.  They said people could improve their score but their are definitely limits.  They said basically what you test is what you are.  I believe their example was if a high school freshman takes it and scores an 80 then they might be able to improve it 5 points or so in their life but there isnt ever going to be a big difference after that age.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

14 minutes ago, Jaxel said:

Billy Marshal hosted the co-owner of S2 and he said practicing doesn't improve your score to a great degree. Studies with top athletes at several schools who take the test from high school to their senior year in college only see roughly ~5 point difference even taking it for years.

That was a terrific interview 

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I guess the interesting thing to me is all media says this is heavily driven by Tepper, but everything coming from the front office and coaches says otherwise. I guess the truth doesn't matter, as long as he succeeds.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

So he says "if you're 5'6" and can't throw for more than 35 yards then it doesn't matter" How about 5'10" and 50 yards? JK. Seems like an overrated/unknown tool so far and only half the league has bought into it and gone under contract for the data. Curious to see how Levis does with his 93 score

  • Poo 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • I think he did a solid job.  Honestly I liked his post game interview the best.  He gave himself a C and said he left a lot out on the field.  That kind of attitude can carry him far.
    • This is lacking a fairly considerable amount of context. For one, Adams(age 22) started 12 of 16 games, had 38 rec, 446 yds and 3 TD's on 66 targets(18 less, with 2 less games started). The main thing missing here is that the top two WR's for Green Bay that year combined for about 2800 yds and 25 TD's. Now if you want to throw a more accurate dart at Adams, take a look at year two. This year the production was spread around considerably and Adams didn't stand out from that pack(pun not intended).  So, if XL struggles mightily this season, I would probably keep that comparison in your quiver to counter argue. I would suggest that I don't think that scenario is probably very accurate for most HOF caliber WR's taken in the first round over the past 15 or so years. Adams was the 89th pick overall, as well. A little different hill to climb than XL, although not massively.
    • to clarify I am not referring to Will Levis.  Not knowingly.   I just made that up and tried to use a reasonable guesstimate of what else was done.  That sounded in the ballpark.  At one time I did look it all up and there were several teams that had much more successful days downfield.   If that happened to be Levis' actual numbers than it's more of a lucky coincidence.  If memory serves, it wasn't just Will Levis that brought the claim into question, it was SEVERAL teams had better days.  and you are missing my entire point of the subjective nature of it all.  If PFF employee Doug watched Bryce's film and then used his same unique subjective vantage point to grade all 31 other starting QBs.  Then dumped into into a spread sheet, it would a subjective Doug take but at least it would be a level uniform subjectivity.   The grades are done by various people.  All watching and applying their own subjective view to a play.  Everyone isn't going to grade incompletions out the same.  Or completions.   So when you dump it all into a spread sheet and hit sort.....it's not actually a statement of fact as portrayed.  Which is why you sometimes get some head scratching stuff.  I'm not reframing anything.   I don't think.  I just wasn't going to look it all back up so I was talking vaguely off the general issue I have with PFF and treating any random claim they make as the truth. 
×
×
  • Create New...