Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Hall of Famer Bill Parcells on Bryce Young's Size: 'He Better Walk on Water'


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, rippadonn said:

You're coming up with that by yourself or are you following the other guppies a couple pages back.

Do ANY of you have an original thought?

"If rippadonn said so" derp derp

Dummy Feeling Dumb GIF

 

 

Pointing Laughing GIF

ripp it isn't our job on the line. If these folks are wrong they're getting sent packing and we're still here. There isn't anything we can do about it but hope for the best.

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, CPantherKing said:

Let everyone dive into the over valued QBs for another year.

Question should be about what do you want from a QB? Playoffs? Playoff wins? Conference championship? SB championship? Dynasty QB?

Then look at round value of QBs for each category when given a franchise opportunity. If they are never given an opportunity to lead a franchise, you can't consider them. There will always be QBs capable of winning a SB and being a dynasty QB that never realize it because teams choose to never give them an opportunity.

Now, look at elements of QB longevity if you want a dynasty QB.

If there are flags on a QB that may lead to their longevity or SB potential from being compromised, you let another team take the long shot and waste draft capital.

QBs like Drew Brees, Kyler Murray, Bryce Young, and Russell Wilson should never be drafted in the 1st. If they fall to the 2nd or 3rd round and everything else pointed to them being a 1st round pick, then draft them and commit to them for several years while you get immediate impact players in the 1st round.

Parcells knows the probability and risk. He knows the value of wasting 1st round value. The data has shown that the dramatic increase of 1st round QBs selected in the past 15 seasons has not led to a significant return of NFL championship success for the teams investing in rookie QBs.

Fire by the way! Exactly. But but but, he's amazing. Somebody needs to break the spell because stylistically his game won't last long next level. Parcels see it. Even I can see it.

They have to learn old lessons all over again QBs have a prototype for a reason, you bet on THAT if all things are equal but they're not.

Bryce Young isn't a running QB in the NFL.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

No big stats. Just a huge number of attempts one year and still not a better completion percentage than Corral.

Why? Why? Because they said so?! The historical data doesn't support his success and he's not Kyler Murray, who because of his stats and advantages, I'd have to pick over Young, looking at data not listening to media and huddle fanboys. So it's not just about short. Kyler offers more. Modern day dual threat.

BY is a College hero.

Edited by rippadonn
Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 hours ago, Jackie Lee said:

Any concerns on him standing on his toes or hopping in the air to get throws off? That kinda stuff no one brings up on film reviews for some reason

I could care less how he gets the ball out to a receiver, just as long as he is consistently releasing the ball quickly and on target with his throws.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

32 minutes ago, Day1PanthersFan said:

If we get it wrong, we can just tank and try again next year 

Or have we already traded our 2024 #1 ? 

Plus we have the legendary Andy Dalton to fall back on 

Fitterer was here when we picked JC Horn over Micah Parsons right? Iirc Ripp wanted Micah in the first and Trask in the second that year.

Bryce Young would be that. Again.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, rippadonn said:

What else does he do? Walk on water?

Extending plays in and out of the pocket? Have you read or seen anything about him? His game’s compared mostly to Mahomes and Wilson are they old school pocket passers too?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • okay I found this and it sounds like my hopes for the first surgery being not such a great job seems like it could be actual reality.  I only hoped because that would give a better chance for recovery and ia a possible scenario so I just thought it could be possible. Had no real evidence of it. But I’ll be damned.    This is a detailed report of Brooks’ surgery and the condition of his knee after the failed repair.     https://x.com/jmthrivept/status/2055743129408704806?s= Sparked by some very good questions by @CoachspeakIndex, here’s some info on Jonathon Brooks: 1. Speculation that the first graft/ACLR by Dr. Cooper didn’t “take” or at least was too lax, leading to failure and re-tear. Brooks dealt with issues cutting, progressing in his rehab into the early stages of 2024 and then re-tore it late 2024, requiring a second ACLR in January 2025 (essentially revision). Notably, CAR prolonged Brooks’ rehab process through Sept-Oct due to issues progressing into the next stages of rehab. 2. Second surgery performed by Dr. Neal ElAttrache, who has extensive experience with revisions. He did a double bundle technique, harvesting graft from Brooks’ left patellar tendon and a strip of his right IT Band (his right patellar tendon had been utilized for the prior graft in 2023. The double bundle technique significantly increases rotational stability of the knee, leading to a stronger and more secure graft/reconstruction. Also to note, Brooks’ surgery wasn’t significantly delayed, meaning that the tunnels from his prior ACLR were in good shape and they didn’t need to perform bone grafts to fill in (would have delayed 2nd surgery by 5-6 months). Essentially, reading the tea leaves tells me that everything else except for the graft itself was still in good quality within his knee. Good sign for future.  3. Typically, you see a performance increase anywhere from 16-20 months post-revision. Brooks will be ~21 months out from his second surgery by the time Week 1 hits. His knee should be more stable and stronger this time around, with adequate time for healing and return to all movement patterns. I’m not viewing this situation as a typical “Player __ had TWO ACL tears, he’s cooked” situation. Rather, I’m viewing it as the first procedure failed, but the second procedure is significantly stronger and should allow him to return to form this time around. I don’t know why it posted as a link but there it is.  
    • Jackie, any more reps tomorrow, or is that it for this session?  thanks for the work
    • How can you say they aren’t trying to win now with all the moves made in free agency? Or is trading first round picks the only way to be win now? I’d be fine never trading another first round pick again, win now be damned.
×
×
  • Create New...