Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Final Say..the S2 scores that were leaked aren't accurate


Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, PanthersGOATFan336 said:

Good point there was a lot of misconception, just wanted to clear it up once and for all.

There will still be idiots here quoting “18%”, lol. This is the huddle but I applaud you attempting to provide the truth and the most recent accurate bit of information we have. 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, Varking said:

It’s that time of year where teams want a player to drop to them and make up lies about said player. Folks here on the Huddle took the bait. 

It would be pretty easy info for the top teams in the draft to find out so I don’t really buy other teams leaking he had a bad score. But all reports coming out now is Stroud is gonna slip in the draft there has to be a reason 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

He didn't say that the 18% wasn't accurate....if anything he just damned CJ even more, because that 18% score came when he was tired, hungry, didn't want to do it, late at night, a bunch of other excuses. How will CJ be able to process information during the 4th quarter of a night game? I don't know, but it still seems very bad for CJ. This coming from a CJ fan and would have been happy if he was the pick.

 

Also what is "significantly higher the second time" from 18%? I mean 52% is significantly higher.

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, amcoolio said:

He didn't say that the 18% wasn't accurate....if anything he just damned CJ even more, because that 18% score came when he was tired, hungry, didn't want to do it, late at night, a bunch of other excuses. How will CJ be able to process information during the 4th quarter of a night game? I don't know, but it still seems very bad for CJ. This coming from a CJ fan and would have been happy if he was the pick.

 

Also what is "significantly higher the second time" from 18%? I mean 52% is significantly higher.

He mentioned the player traveled to an All-star game, is it a reference to a Bowl game (shrine, senior..?). Then that explanation was not for Stroud...

 

 

edit: Hendon Hooker had 46% and went to Senior Bowl, could be his score that is being talked about? 

Edited by kass
see edit
  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't even know what to believe anymore. It's lying season. 

Those scores could have been leaked so he could fall to a team outside the top 10.

They could be legit but the S2 owner is doing damage control for a potential top 2 pick who took a massive hit after doing poorly on their cognitive test so other future players will pay to take it next season. 

All I know is we're taking Young at 1 and all your attempts at saying we're taking Stroud are futile. 

  • Pie 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

We are picking Young.  And when that pick comes in, please start a thread about the new team you are going to root for, because I doubt people want to deal with you every time our QB gets hit or has a turnover over the next decade.  Your obsession with name-calling and Young bashing is borderline.  Perhaps we will understand more when Netflix completes their documentary on you.

 

  • Pie 4
  • Beer 2
  • Flames 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Great. Meet me at BOA 6am Saturday morning and we’ll get you started. 
    • considering [Dave] Canales enters Year 3 working for an impulsive owner. There’s not much room to slide backwards from an 8-9 season and 13-21 overall record. It doesn’t help that his primary job has been the development of quarterback Bryce Young, and the progress there has been inconsistent. Canales was supposed to turn the former top pick into a franchise quarterback. If that doesn’t happen by next January, the Panthers could be looking for both a new coach and quarterback." —————- The format of that doesn’t display on my iPad I had to paste it as plain text to see it so I am leaving it here to refer to… I am gonna disagree with a lot of that.  First reference is Tepper. That interview posted here a few days back gave me the impression that he is really happy with his FO. And Canales. Seat isn’t even warm as of right now. IMO.  The assertion that Canales is supposed to turn Young into a franchise QB is something I have never bought. First, how could anyone look at 2023Bryce and see a can’t miss Franchise player?  He was for sure a could miss.  I am not sure it was fix Bryce or you are both gone. Maybe that will happen The longer it drags on, I think maybe the more likely a total house cleaning could be an outcome. I mean it is only year 3 of Canales coming up. But as a couple of people like to point out, he has shown other concerning flaws that might damage his stock.  As far as the hot seat, mid season with 2-3 wins I would imagine yeah it would be pretty warm. I think a small regression to say 7 or maybe even 6 wins would be tolerated but the seat is warm for 2027. Depends on the circumstances. 
    • Or finish 7th and lose the first game to set up with the Pistons. One they have less playoff experience than the Knicks or Celtics and two cuz fug em that's why 
×
×
  • Create New...