Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

DAY 2: Best of the Rest Big Board by Positions of Interest


MHS831
 Share

Recommended Posts

37 minutes ago, GOAT said:

I want Mayer so badly. Mentally prepping myself to not get him.

I hope we trade back, so much talent left.

I'm surprised by the number of players still on the board that were thought to be mid to lower first rounders.  I guess all it took was a couple of teams to draft players thought to be second or even third rounders in round one to put us here.

Mayer is one of those, as is Porter.  I'm less surprised about Levis still being on the board than those.  When Myles Murphy was still on the board at 28 I was wondering WTF? 

I thought Darnell Washington could be gone by the time we pick again, and who knows, he may still be but the fact Mayer is also on the board as we turn into round two provides some hope.

We certainly need an Edge, but I think we also need to look at the biggest "bang for the buck" available.  I am also not opposed to trading down a bit and picking up another pick today.

 

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

So much talent left. We could end up with a beast TE to go with our rookie QB. Just think if Mayer or Washington falls to us and they are as good as advertised. That would be a huge boost to our offense. WR isn’t as big of a deal to me. I think there is better talent at CB than edge right now and I feel that CB is a bigger need than edge.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, WUnderhill said:

I appreciate you including Sanders as an edge. He started his college career as a DE not a LB. I think he makes so much sense and brings so much versatility as a 3-4 OLB.

Agree here, I think if he were the pick he’d probably be deployed like Micah Parsons is. Playing a lot of EDGE but also playing ILB when it calls for it. Luvu kinda fills a similar role but I feel like they want him more as a running mate for Shaq on the inside. 
 

I feel like if Joey Porter slips they may go Corner first. But I’m hoping they can trade back and pick up another 3rd or a 4th they could package to get into the 3rd, so they can walk away with a receiver at some point. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, MHS831 said:
54 minutes ago, rayzor said:

most likely edge or CB.

i think the better value of the two right now is at CB, but they'll probably be wanting edge more.

I agree--Porter and Branch are first round talents--I even see a possible trade up for either.

Ojulari makes the most sense

I agree with ya'll. FWIW, I traded back in my mock (we get 46 and 76, NE gets 39 and 114) and ended up with Brents (CB) and Hall (Edge) . 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, LordOfDaWingz said:

I want a second tightend so bad. I want to put up points next season but I wouldn’t be upset considering the talent that’s left on defense. Man I feel like we’re always using early picks on defense. 

agreed and great avatar!

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, shaqattaq said:

Same, except my "guy" is Porter. SOOO much talent on the board.

imagine our two bookend corners, the sons of former NFL stars.

if I'm a Steelers fan and they pass on him today with the 32nd pick, I would absolutely rage.

  • Pie 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, PantherOnTheProwl1523 said:

Tight Ends

·       Darnell Washington, Georgia (2)

 

Wide Receivers

·       Jonathan Mingo, Mississippi (2)

 

Offensive Linemen

·       O’Cyrus Torrence (G) Florida (2)

 

Cornerbacks

·       Kelee Ringo, Georgia (2)

 

Edge 

·       BJ Ojulari, LSU (2)

 

this is a good list if you swap Washington for LaPorta.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • How am I all over the place?  I'm still saying that. I'm saying that Chark at his best and T-Mac right now, on the same team right now for the 2025 season, T-Mac would be ahead of him on the depth chart Week 1. Because in the same way everyone is saying, "T-Mac hasn't played a snap in the NFL yet", the very same is true to say, "nothing Chark did in his past matters moving forward" His peak was a 1,008 yard season where he was the only decent WR on a terrible team.  He didn't put up the 1k yard season because he was a great WR, it was because of how bad the rest of them on the team were. His stats aren't the same as his ability, and his ability was never all that good to begin with. Hell, most of this board agrees that T-Mac is our #1 right now, even if Thielen is Bryce's #1 option early in the saeson just because of the comfort level there, he's still just a slot safety valve and T-Mac is our #1. If you put peak Chark on the roster RIGHT NOW (even without T-Mac)... is anyone even putting him over Thielen, XL, or Coker going into this season? I'm honestly not sure many of us would consider him as such, because even at his best, he was just a JAG.  So if the same people who are okay with T-Mac being ahead of those guys right now, wouldn't put Chark above them, how can you in the same breath say Chark was better than T-Mac already is now?
    • Dude... you're just all over the place. You're the one who said T-Mac is better right now than Chark was at his best.
    • When I say "average NFL WR", for me, that's comparing him to all WRs in the league during that season/span of time.  He was of course better than those #4-6 WR's that can't even get on the field, but talent/ability wise, he probably wasn't any better than a #3 WR for most NFL teams, he just happened to be on one of the teams in 2019 with even worse WR's so he put up solid stats for the season. Here's more or less how I'm looking at it. Take T-Mac right now and Chark at his best, put them on every NFL team at this very moment, and where would they fall on the depth chart come Week 1 (basically, the teams that don't put the rookies at #1 to "make them earn it in camp" don't count, it's projecting week 1 depth charts). T-Mac would be at worst the #2 WR on the majority of teams this season, (hell, he's likely our #1 at this very moment right now already), peak Chark would not.  Yes, T-Mac still has to prove himself at this level, but his current ability, even as a rookie who hasn't played a snap yet, would have him above Chark on any team's week 1 depth chart. Because again, you can't just fall back on "well Chark had a 1,000 yard season" and use that as the reason for having him above T-Mac.  As he didn't have that 1k yards because he was a beast, it was because he was the only halfway decent receiving option on a bad team that was always losing and passing the ball (the Jags had the 7th worst scoring differential that season).
×
×
  • Create New...