Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

More NFL News


Mr. Scot
 Share

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Howell is gonna be a week one starter in year two. Corral hopes to actually be on an NFL roster in week one of year two. I rest my case on that one.

 

 A season ending injury in first preseason might have a little affect on that.

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

 

 

College football fans are wondering how he maintained eligibility and did not graduate. To play football, you must attend class and carry a certain GPA.

 Georgia better hope that the NCAA doesn’t get too interested in this subject.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/sports/other/cfb-world-laughs-at-stetson-bennett-news/ar-AA1b9tzf

Edited by ladypanther
Link to comment
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, ladypanther said:

 

 

College football fans are wondering how he maintained eligibility and did not graduate. To play football, you must attend class and carry a certain GPA.

 Georgia better hope that the NCAA doesn’t get too interested in this subject.

https://www.msn.com/en-in/sports/other/cfb-world-laughs-at-stetson-bennett-news/ar-AA1b9tzf

It can be done. Minimum credits per semester and change your major a couple times plus load up on electives. Yeah. ..there's ways you can extend your stay and burn a lot of money. A lack of focus can do that.

  • Pie 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, TheCasillas said:

availability is his issue. Also, I remember correctly he has had some fumbling issues as welll.

I get that but CMC had availability issues here and we still got a nice return for him. I know he is a tier above Cook, but the talent is definitely there. I didn’t know about the fumbles though. None of these big contract RBs have really worked out…

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Miller being less raw and more pro ready makes sense of why they picked him. With us having a capable starter in Walker the lower floor higher ceiling player makes sense for us as well. I agree with that. 
    • I'm from Michigan and have had this discussion with my Lions friends, and they all agree with me, they were never going to take Freeling over Miller.  As, yes, you are correct, they could have left Sewell at RT and taken Freeling, but they are in a SB contention window right now. An OL with Freeling at LT and Sewell at RT is not as strong as Sewell at LT and Miller at RT would be for this upcoming season and likely at least next year as well. 5 years it could be looked back upon as a long term "mistake" to take Miller over Freeling, but for a franchise like the Lions, you can't worry about the long term when you have current SB aspirations.  It's all about maximizing their current SB window over the next 1-3 years. And it's not about style, it's about day 1 readiness, and a lot of "experts" aren't even sure if Freeling is ready to play Week 1 yet at the position he's used to, let alone switching to a side he hasn't played before, but a career starting RT is going to be more than ready to fill that role for them Week 1. I'm 100% convinced that if our draft positioning was swapped, we'd have still taken Freeling, they'd have still taken Miller, and both teams would have got the OT that they preferred due to what each team needs right now and what their current realistic aspirations are for the 2026 season. We're in a position where we can let our drafted OT sit and learn for a bit, they needed a week 1 starter, for me that's where this discussion becomes very easy to understand why each team took the player they did.
×
×
  • Create New...