Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Potential $1.2B Panthers stadium renovation discussion


Lame Duck
 Share

Recommended Posts

25 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Not really what you are trying to portray under current economic conditions mixed with inflation. While I agree the price is high for anything next to a complete renovation. You aren’t factoring in inflation, especially current day inflation and price of material and labor. So you are either intentionally or unintentionally misplacing. 

Typical barely legible word salad from you when you try to present yourself as semi-intelligent. It's like a Kamala Harris speech rambling on about the passage of time.

Cincinnati actually did some   legwork on this.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wlwt.com/amp/article/cincinnati-bengals-paycor-stadium-deal-price-renovations/43636202

They found that the average cost of NFL stadium renovations $600-$850M. Their owner is saying a billion. So Tepper is basically asking for roughly 50-100% over average and 20% more than what the Bengals are quoting Cincinnati.

Again, the number seems high. But there's pockets to line when you're fleecing municipalities.

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, LinvilleGorge said:

Typical barely legible word salad from you when you try to present yourself as semi-intelligent. It's like a Kamala Harris speech rambling on about the passage of time.

Cincinnati actually did some   legwork on this.

https://www.google.com/amp/s/www.wlwt.com/amp/article/cincinnati-bengals-paycor-stadium-deal-price-renovations/43636202

They found that the average cost of NFL stadium renovations $600-$850M. Their owner is saying a billion. So Tepper is basically asking for roughly 50-100% over average and 20% more than what the Bengals are quoting Cincinnati.

Again, the number seems high. But there's pockets to line when you're fleecing municipalities.

I get you don’t like being exposed. But not all stadiums are in the same condition. BOA sucks ass. Let’s all admit that. Do I disagree that the tax payers shouldn’t be on the hook for it. But read the follow up post before you get your panties all in a bunch. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Sorry, but economists should be right there with politicians for trustworthiness. I know that they're good for saying that sports teams have the same economic value as a department store...

But they also say that too much employment is a bad thing. They also say that the economy requires a certain number of people to be unemployed to be a 'good economy'. In fact the current threatened recession is 100% by design of economists who were "trying to take the heat out of the economy", only it's now getting away from them when thought they could control the levers that would force people out of work.

 

Modern economists are mostly dopes who work in an abstract laboratory that treats people's lives as numbers to be sacrificed to satisfy their "invisible hand" deity. Source: I spent years working with economists working on major projects, and they can make any proposal look "good" for the economy or "bad" for the economy by a simple change in Excel.

TL;DR: A position based on the right/wrong of public dollars supporting billionaires is one thing, but I recommend not using economists to support that position.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

I get you don’t like being exposed. But not all stadiums are in the same condition. BOA sucks ass. Let’s all admit that. Do I disagree that the tax payers shouldn’t be on the hook for it. But read the follow up post before you get your panties all in a bunch. 

Exposed. 😂

Go argue with the county commissioners in Cincinnati. Yes, we all know there is inflation. The numbers were solely to provide some basis for comparison. 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, BrisbanePanther said:

Sorry, but economists should be right there with politicians for trustworthiness. I know that they're good for saying that sports teams have the same economic value as a department store...

But they also say that too much employment is a bad thing. They also say that the economy requires a certain number of people to be unemployed to be a 'good economy'. In fact the current threatened recession is 100% by design of economists who were "trying to take the heat out of the economy", only it's now getting away from them when thought they could control the levers that would force people out of work.

 

Modern economists are mostly dopes who work in an abstract laboratory that treats people's lives as numbers to be sacrificed to satisfy their "invisible hand" deity. Source: I spent years working with economists working on major projects, and they can make any proposal look "good" for the economy or "bad" for the economy by a simple change in Excel.

TL;DR: A position based on the right/wrong of public dollars supporting billionaires is one thing, but I recommend not using economists to support that position.

I think a lot of economic theory is basically pseudoscience but it's not all that hard to do an economic study on things like this. Similar sized cities with and without NFL franchises. Before and afters with cities recently acquiring NFL franchises. Keep in mind, most economists are somewhere between extremely pro-business and completely pro-business so it goes against their basic instincts to argue against business investment.

I've never seen a study that argues that public investment in sports stadiums is anything other than a giant negative.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, TheSpecialJuan said:

Do it or Tepper walks and takes the team with him 

Unpopular opinion but I live like 5000 miles away so the tram moving has literally no impact on my fandom. 

 

... would rather see the money go to the local population... 

  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

 

BOA is a decent stadium. Not sure why you think it sucks. But this renovation is going to give the stadium a more modern look and feel.

It’s how old now? Even with upgrades it’s never felt like it had a true renovation. Safety poo JR got the city to pay for sure. But a bare bones tear down. Nah. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, BrisbanePanther said:

Sorry, but economists should be right there with politicians for trustworthiness. I know that they're good for saying that sports teams have the same economic value as a department store...

But they also say that too much employment is a bad thing. They also say that the economy requires a certain number of people to be unemployed to be a 'good economy'. In fact the current threatened recession is 100% by design of economists who were "trying to take the heat out of the economy", only it's now getting away from them when thought they could control the levers that would force people out of work.

 

Modern economists are mostly dopes who work in an abstract laboratory that treats people's lives as numbers to be sacrificed to satisfy their "invisible hand" deity. Source: I spent years working with economists working on major projects, and they can make any proposal look "good" for the economy or "bad" for the economy by a simple change in Excel.

TL;DR: A position based on the right/wrong of public dollars supporting billionaires is one thing, but I recommend not using economists to support that position.

Please do not talk about Adam Smith in that way.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Here is a comparison of what the Bears are asking from the city. $2.2b dollars. 
 

https://frontofficesports.com/chicago-unveils-2-2b-domed-soldier-field-plan-to-keep-bears/#:~:text=Chicago Unveils %242.2B Domed Soldier Field Plan to Keep Bears
 

“On top of a new glass dome to protect the inside of the venue from weather, the $2.2 billionrenovation proposal includes club lounges, food halls, an entertainment district, and a transit hub.

Seating at the updated stadium would expand to 70,000, with more private suites.

The transit hub would include access to CTA, Metro, and Amtrak rail lines, as well as a new “CHI-Line” downtown circulator system for rideshares.

Soldier Field would also include a veteran’s memorial.

“Chicago deserves an extraordinary vision to take this iconic public asset into the next hundred years and beyond,” said Bob Dunn, president of Landmark Development.”

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Since I'm no longer a Charlotte resident, I can't really weigh in on their local politics.  Cabarrus county is it's own stupid animal!

While I'm not in favor of giving money to Tepper or any billionaire for a private business, I understand the pressure to do it anyway.  There are only 32 NFL teams, and each team is a very valuable asset.  Does it create enough economic activity?  I don't know.  But I do know there is a certain "pull" to having an NFL team.

Your city is shown in wide shots on game day.  At night, your city becomes a star of the game.  For a while, it was the mark your city "made" it.  Was that a good one?  No, but it's all fluff, right?  The games can create a sense of community, give your city something to rally around when politics are so dumb.  Game Day is infectious.  I remember going to Panther games and feeling this sense of excitement throughout downtown.  I loved that.  If I could do that again, I'd love to.

Will it be the end of Charlotte if our local sports team leaves?  No.  Will $600m be better spent in other areas the budget allows?  I don't know enough about all of that to have an opinion.

  • Pie 4
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

 

BOA is a decent stadium. Not sure why you think it sucks. But this renovation is going to give the stadium a more modern look and feel.

A more modern stadium look and feel has never made me want to attend or not attend a game.  Some of the best places to go watch a game are pieces of poo in reality.   Something that spans over all sports. 

if someone didn’t go to a game last year….it wasn’t because of the stadium.  It’s was the Panthers team being a joke and the ticket being too expensive to justify watching them. 

maybe I can get some of the absurdity for a city that wants to host things bigger than their NFL teams games but I don’t see us in the mix.  

and Teppers renovation is on the very high side based on the numbers.

  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Games been a snooze fest of sloppy play
    • ESPN's David Newton: QUARTERBACKS (2): Bryce Young, Andy Dalton A preseason muscle injury to Dalton's right arm could force the Panthers to keep Jack Plummer if the issue gets worse, but that currently doesn't seem to be a concern. For the first time since going No. 1 in 2023, there is no question that Young is the starter after winning two of his final three games last season with 10 touchdowns (7 passing, 3 rushing) and no turnovers. RUNNING BACKS (3): Chuba Hubbard, Rico Dowdle, Trevor Etienne Selecting Etienne in the fourth round out of Georgia makes veteran Raheem Blackshear a likely cut. Etienne has shown in the preseason that he is a capable option as a runner, in addition to being a returner, which has been Blackshear's primary responsibility since 2022. WIDE RECEIVERS (7): Tetairoa McMillan, Xavier Legette, Adam Thielen, Jalen Coker, Jimmy Horn Jr., David Moore, Hunter Renfrow This is the most improved group on the team, so keeping seven initially makes sense. If the Panthers go with six it could make coach Dave Canales' favorite, Moore, expendable with Renfrow showing he's close to the level he played in 2021 when he made the Pro Bowl with the Las Vegas Raiders. Brycen Tremayne, who's had an excellent preseason, will be a tough cut. TIGHT ENDS (3): Tommy Tremble, Ja'Tavion Sanders, Mitchell Evans There is anticipation Tremble (back surgery) will be ready for the regular season after coming off the PUP list before the preseason finale, though he could still miss a game or two. Keeping him on the 53-man roster makes sense so she doesn't have to miss the first four games. OFFENSIVE LINEMEN (10): T Ikem Ekwonu, G Damien Lewis, G Robert Hunt, C Austin Corbett, C Cade Mays, T Taylor Moton, T Yosh Nijman, T-G Brady Christensen, G Chandler Zavala, G Jarrett Kingston Injuries to guards Lewis (strained shoulder) and Zavala (knee) plays a factor in keeping 10 instead of the nine predicted going into camp. The starting five returning from 2024 had a solid preseason, but the lackluster play of backups showed depth remains a concern. DEFENSIVE LINEMEN (6): DE Derrick Brown, NT Bobby Brown III, DE Tershawn Wharton, DE A'Shawn Robinson, NT Cam Jackson , DE Jaden Crumedy A shoulder injury that has kept fifth-round pick Jackson from making an impact means Crumedy could make it here. The biggest cut will be Shy Tuttle, who has 32 starts the past two years but little to show for it. Moving on from him will create $2.4 million in cap space that can be used elsewhere. LINEBACKERS (10): OLB D.J. Wonnum, OLB Patrick Jones II, OLB Princely Umanmielen, OLB Nic Scourton, OLB Thomas Incoom, ILB Christian Rozeboom, ILB Trevin Wallace, ILB Claudin Cherelus, ILB Jon Rhattigan, ILB Jacoby Windmon The release of ILB Josey Jewell (concussion protocol) at the start of camp required immediate attention, but Rozeboom has stepped up well. Depth remains a big question, particularly inside. Moving on from draft pick Bam Martin-Scott means he'll likely end up on the practice squad. It was time to move on from OLB DJ Johnson. Look for turnover beyond the starters here. CORNERBACKS (5): Jaycee Horn, Mike Jackson, Chau Smith-Wade, Shemar Bartholomew, Corey ThorntonJackson has played well enough at times to ease the concern opposite Pro Bowler Horn. Thorton's play during camp has been a big surprise, but the overall depth of this group means there likely will be turnover. SAFETIES (4): Tre'von Moehrig, Nick Scott, Demani Richardson, Lathan Ransom The big question is how long it will take fourth-round pick Ransom to replace Scott as the starter opposite Moehrig. Also, don't rule out another experienced player being signed. SPECIALISTS (3): K Ryan Fitzgerald, P Sam Martin, LS JJ Jansen Big-legged undrafted free agent Fitzgerald out of Florida State may have solidified his spot over Matthew Wright with a 52-yard field goal in the second preseason game against the Texans. The other two spots are solid, but Carolina likely will keep an eye out for dependable veterans who end up being released.
    • Holy poo Is it raining grease? Neither team can hold on to the ball.
×
×
  • Create New...