Jump to content
  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

Ranking the NFCS Rosters


poundaway
 Share

Recommended Posts

Good to hear the Panthers getting some love. It's nice to have Ryan Brees and now Brady out of the picture. If anyone thinks this might be an easy division though I would wait and see what the preseason brings. The Bucs could go either way but the Saints and Falcons will definitely test us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

He’s played 0 snaps in the nfl.  I’m going to hold off on proclaiming what he is until he actually does it.   And where did I call him incompetent?

You said we need a competent QB. Then you doubled down with Dalton. Young is a competent QB. He meets all of the criteria of the statement. He has everything needed to have success himself. 

  • Pie 3
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Smithers said:

I don’t agree.  Tampa’s O-line is trash.  They lost their top RB.  Their pass rush is below average.  And they have the worst QB in the division.

Mmmm but they still have the big pieces, and they have depth(at least of last year). I won’t start catching up on other teams rosters until 53 is set in August/September, too many variables to worry about out of the house stuff. What I know is our depth the past 3 years has been complete garbage and last year was no exception. Wilks was just about to coax a little more out of them and didn’t have as many injuries. As a complete roster going into the season from last season I’d go,

TB

NO =/> CAR

 ATL. 

Depth matters.

Edited by Harbingers
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Harbingers said:

You said we need a competent QB. Then you doubled down with Dalton. Young is a competent QB. He meets all of the criteria of the statement. He has everything needed to have success himself. 

He is not a qb competent yet.   He hasn’t taken one fuging snap yet.  He is totally unproven.  Goddamn some of you guys need to not get so fuging emotional defending him.   

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just now, mrcompletely11 said:

He is not a qb competent yet.   He hasn’t taken one fuging snap yet.  He is totally unproven.  Goddamn some of you guys need to not get so fuging emotional defending him.   

Like I said. You are confusing competent and unproven. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
  • Flames 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don’t understand why people think our roster is worse than Tampa and Atlanta’s outside if the QB? We split with these teams last year with terrible QB play and half of a coaching staff. I think we definitely got better as well. Brown, Burns, Horn, Chinn, and Shaq are as good of pieces as any defense in the division. Our OL is probably the best, Sanders is probably better than Tampa or NO’s RBs (with Kamara suspended), our WRs are pretty unproven outside of Thielen/Chark so we are probably last there but Hurst is mid-tier for TE (below ATL obviously). 

  • Pie 2
  • Beer 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I don’t understand why people think our roster is worse than Tampa and Atlanta’s outside if the QB? We split with these teams last year with terrible QB play and half of a coaching staff. I think we definitely got better as well. Brown, Burns, Horn, Chinn, and Shaq are as good of pieces as any defense in the division. Our OL is probably the best, Sanders is probably better than Tampa or NO’s RBs (with Kamara suspended), our WRs are pretty unproven outside of Thielen/Chark so we are probably last there but Hurst is mid-tier for TE (below ATL obviously). 

I think Atlantas roster is heavily underrated. If their QB is halfway decent (big ask), they won't compete with the 49ers or Eagles but they will be in that 2nd tier of NFC teams with the Giants, Seahawks etc.

Tampa and NO rosters are old and bad.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, ForJimmy said:

I don’t understand why people think our roster is worse than Tampa and Atlanta’s outside if the QB? We split with these teams last year with terrible QB play and half of a coaching staff. I think we definitely got better as well. Brown, Burns, Horn, Chinn, and Shaq are as good of pieces as any defense in the division. Our OL is probably the best, Sanders is probably better than Tampa or NO’s RBs (with Kamara suspended), our WRs are pretty unproven outside of Thielen/Chark so we are probably last there but Hurst is mid-tier for TE (below ATL obviously). 

 

I truly believe that most folks just can't let go of the past. Their fear of the past is stronger than their hope for the future.

 

Also, there are those that just have to be realists. But that's a whole different animal. lol

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Harbingers said:

Mmmm but they still have the big pieces, and they have depth(at least of last year). I won’t start catching up on other teams rosters until 53 is set in August/September, too many variables to worry about out of the house stuff. What I know is our depth the past 3 years has been complete garbage and last year was no exception. Wilks was just about to coax a little more out of them and didn’t have as many injuries. As a complete roster going into the season from last season I’d go,

TB

NO =/> CAR

 ATL. 

Depth matters.

I think NO has the most complete team/depth outside of QB, and they actually got a solid QB this year.

Not sure how you have Tampa ranked #1 - the team lost their entire pass rush outside of Vea, is awful at half of their O-line spots (with no oline depth), and practially lost all of their secondary depth

The only positions I think they are strong at is WR (if Godwin can actually stay healthy), LB, and secondary (1 injury here severely changes that though). 

I wouldn't be surprised if Tampa is a seller at the trade deadline and finishes last in the division.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Who is underrating Atlanta's roster?

 

They have been getting praise all offseason for their moves and draft. Their only weakness is QB. They literally have the skill positions on offense. They improved that defense tremendously.

The article linked at the beginning of the thread. 

  • Pie 1
  • Beer 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Sean Payton's Vicodin said:

I think Atlantas roster is heavily underrated. If their QB is halfway decent (big ask), they won't compete with the 49ers or Eagles but they will be in that 2nd tier of NFC teams with the Giants, Seahawks etc.

Tampa and NO rosters are old and bad.

Atlanta has some great skill players, but how are they in the trenches? The OL and run defense was pretty bad last year. They do have the 2nd best coaching staff IMO outside of us.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

 Share


  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • Just because all draft picks are a gamble doesn't mean you don't have a better chance at hitting on a better player the higher you're drafting. It would literally be like someone saying, I'll give you 1 or 2 free spins on a slot machine, and you say you'll take the 1 because you're not likely to win anything anyways with 1 or 2, so why bother? The Cowboys desperately wanted T-Mac, but because they were 4 picks behind us, they weren't able to get him.  If you told Cowboys fans that had they lost 2 more games last year in a lost season, that it would get them the player they wanted so badly, would they in retrospect go back and lose those games to get their guy? 95% of them would take that trade off in a heartbeat, and the others who wouldn't are the fans who would rather enjoy an extra win or two in a poo season to then set themselves up to be better for the next decade. I also think the fans who argue against this thinking, get too caught up in the "well that means you're going to be rooting against us late in the season even if we still have a shot at the playoffs." Which isn't true, it's saying if you're telling me right now we'd make the playoffs but lose in the first round, that I'd rather end up 8-9 or 9-8 and just miss the playoffs because in our opinion, the benefits that come along with that outweigh the benefit of the players getting 1 game of playoff experience.
    • In relation to tanking. I think you can count on one hand the number of people here who actually want us to lose football games. When accounting for it across the fanbase it amounts to maybe 2% of the entire Panthers fanbase. But you engage with some internet trolls and think haters are coming out of the woodwork and hey look at that it's all a conspiracy that leads to Bryce Young haters. Do you hear yourself sir? If it sounds ridiculous that's because it is. I mean at this point do you see Bryce haters in your dreams? As far as the culture of this franchise goes we seem to be doing better in that department via what we are building right now and with the people we have in place. But we also shouldn't just make assumptions just yet either. The rubber still needs to meet the road. And going back to previous seasons I think we can acknowledge although tanking obviously isn't a thing there were some times where we thought our culture was improving but really it wasn't. Yes I'm looking directly at some of those wins under Wilks. If the culture had truly changed we would not have lost to the Steelers who have been mediocre for years at home the way we did and they were starting Mitch Trubisky ffs. We did not change our culture for the better and we won games that ultimately meant nothing. It was just a brief mirage. We've done this for years now. The harsh truth of the matter is the Panthers have not had a winning season or been to the playoffs in going on 8 years but in those years they've been trying to convince themselves they aren't poo but in the process all they've done throughout most of that time period is squander better draft position and we were still the worst team in the league for our troubles. At the end of the day we should be able to just be adults and reconcile with that. And no that isn't being "pro tank" or any other boogeyman term it's simply recognizing reality.
    • He's an asset in a game manager role. But as soon as you have to ask him to go out there and try to make plays and not just take what the defense is giving him... well, Darnolding happens.
×
×
  • Create New...