Jump to content

  • Welcome!

    Register and log in easily with Twitter or Google accounts!

    Or simply create a new Huddle account. 

    Members receive fewer ads , access our dark theme, and the ability to join the discussion!

     

WHAT SAY YOU

Bluetooth

By Bluetooth,
in Carolina Panthers

 Share

Recommended Posts

Ricky Prickles Grand Master

Ricky Prickles

Posted
Posted
4 hours ago, CamWhoaaCam said:

Im tired of getting poo'd for suggesting every #1 WR that becomes available so im just going to fit in with everyone else.

 

Hard pass. He will limit the growth of our young potential star WR's in TMJ and Mingo.

 

 

Dont agree with your wanting a #1 WR currently but have never poo'd on you. I just usually respond with a dumb meme to get under your skin but all in good fun my way my brotha!

Link to comment
Share on other sites
MillionDollarCam Grand Master

MillionDollarCam

Posted
Posted

Only 4 receivers had more targets than Diggs last year. If he’s unhappy with that then I’d shudder to think how pissed off he’d be here in an offense that will spread the ball around a lot.

And selfishly I don’t want any more receivers because I’ve drafted TMJ in all my fantasy leagues, I’m going to stay believing that he’ll break out.

  • Beer 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites
tukafan21 Grand Master

tukafan21

Posted
Posted
1 hour ago, SmokinwithWilly said:

If Hopkins had been cut before we signed Theilen it would have been a very interesting conversation to be had. 

Not Thielen, Chark

Hopkins and Thielen barely play the same position, Hopkins is an outside WR while at this point in his career, Thielen is basically just a slot guy (or at least mainly will be for us).

I'd have loved for us to be lining up Hopkins and TMJ on the outside with Thielen in the slot and Mingo getting snaps at each spot backing them up as well as the other slot in 4 wide sets.

  • Pie 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites
PanthersGTI Mentor

PanthersGTI

Posted
Posted

I really doubt this team is looking to add any more receivers unless it's bottom.of the depth chart/camp bodies. Maybe a returner? 

Hopkins would be great cheap but I think they like who they brought in. Passes are going everywhere, and they have signed a speed guy, a clutch/gets open guy, a TE/WR hybrid and a RB who can haul in passes. I doubt we have a true #1 anyways. Next year probably, unless TMJ or Mingo show up to be that guy this season. 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Join the conversation

You can post now and register later. If you have an account, sign in now to post with your account.

Guest
Reply to this topic...

×   Pasted as rich text.   Paste as plain text instead

  Only 75 emoji are allowed.

×   Your link has been automatically embedded.   Display as a link instead

×   Your previous content has been restored.   Clear editor

×   You cannot paste images directly. Upload or insert images from URL.

×
 Share
Go to topic listing

  • PMH4OWPW7JD2TDGWZKTOYL2T3E.jpg

  • Topics

  • Posts

    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      This is about getting open and YAC....and the QB we have.  You basically are just highlighting average depth when targeted vs 2 players. .  And yeah, I often say AT is a small slow reliable TE in terms of what he does for us.   That's what he is.   I think a couple of you want to make this into a Renfrow argument.   I'm a Renfrow fan.  Renfrow does not check the box of what a BY O needs either at the slot.  Renfrow just a niche roleplayer at this level.  it's easy to look up how horrific AT is with the ball in his hands and in terms of getting open.....and it's also easy to look up what a low ceiling of an offense the steady AT diet produces w/ BY. 
    • PNW_PantherMan
      Panthers' content round up

      By PNW_PantherMan · Posted

      The one time he's actively tried to lose was the best we've ever done.
    • CRA
      Post- Training Camp 53-Man Roster Projection

      By CRA · Posted

      I simply acknowledge BY is the QB.  And just like we did when we drafted him.....the type O you would need to setup around him for success was always pretty simple.  But we have done virtually the opposite.  XL dropping some passes isn't why we were ranked the 32nd O and 30th passing the past 2 years.  *Ricky Prohel was brought up only in regards to role function he served on the team.  Niche/specialist.   He wasn't eating up the snaps in the O.    AT should have a similar snap %. People could MAUL Ricky Prohel and put hands all over him.   We got to the Super Bowl in part because we were mauling guys (our slot CB).   You can't do that now.  AT has a MUCH easier life and still can't get open.  Or run.    If you live in 3 WR sets, with a weak armed QB, and you choose to put someone who can't get open or run in the slot.......well, your are going to have a weak pass O.  That's by design IMO.  
×
×
  • Create New...